• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性丙型肝炎病毒1型感染患者不同抗病毒药物治疗方案的成本-效用分析

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Different Antiviral Medicine Regimens in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection.

作者信息

Alavian Seyed Moayed, Nikfar Shekoufeh, Kebriaeezadeh Abbas, Lotfi Farhad, Sanati Ehsan, Rezaei Hemami Mohsen, Keshavarz Khosro

机构信息

Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

出版信息

Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 Oct 2;18(11):e37094. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.37094. eCollection 2016 Nov.

DOI:10.5812/ircmj.37094
PMID:28203449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5295467/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the introduction of new drug regimens with high effectiveness for the hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, especially in HCV genotype 1, no cost-effectiveness study on the selection of the superior drug strategy in Iran has been conducted yet.

OBJECTIVES

This study is aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the three drug regimens of pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PR), sofosbuvir (SOF) + PR and ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in patients with HCV genotype 1 in Iran in the year 2014.

METHODS

A Markov micro-simulation model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the three drug strategies for a cohort of 10000 patients. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were extracted from published studies. Cost data was estimated through the review of medical records and obtaining experts opinion.

RESULTS

The results showed that the SOF + PR drug compared with PR had a lower cost and was more effective, but compared with the LDV/SOF, in spite of its lower cost, it was less efficient. The QALY values obtained for PR, SOF + PR and LDV/SOF, respectively, were 10.98, 12.08 and 12.28 and their costs were $ 41,741, $ 7,676 and $ 46,993. Moreover, the results obtained from acceptability curves showed that SOF + PR were the most cost-effective treatment for thresholds below $ 45,270 PPP.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SOF + PR regimen or LDV/SOF can significantly reduce the incidence of complications associated with the disease. For example, short and long-term outcomes are better than the current drug regimens for HCV genotype 1 patients in all stages of the disease.

摘要

背景

尽管已为丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者引入了高效的新药物疗法,尤其是针对HCV基因1型患者,但伊朗尚未开展关于选择最佳药物策略的成本效益研究。

目的

本研究旨在评估2014年伊朗HCV基因1型患者中聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林(PR)、索磷布韦(SOF)+PR以及来迪派韦和索磷布韦(LDV/SOF)这三种药物疗法的成本效益。

方法

采用马尔可夫微观模拟模型评估这三种药物策略对10000名患者队列的成本效益。从已发表的研究中提取质量调整生命年(QALY)。通过查阅病历并征求专家意见来估算成本数据。

结果

结果显示,与PR相比,SOF+PR药物成本更低且更有效,但与LDV/SOF相比,尽管成本较低,效率却较低。PR、SOF+PR和LDV/SOF分别获得的QALY值为10.98、12.08和12.28,其成本分别为41741美元、7676美元和46993美元。此外,可接受性曲线的结果表明,对于低于45270国际元的阈值,SOF+PR是最具成本效益的治疗方法。

结论

使用SOF+PR方案或LDV/SOF可显著降低与该疾病相关的并发症发生率。例如,在疾病的所有阶段,短期和长期结果均优于目前针对HCV基因1型患者的药物疗法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/8220bdb91ee2/ircmj-18-11-37094-i006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/3e8523c71002/ircmj-18-11-37094-i001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/653c696a82c5/ircmj-18-11-37094-i002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/8feab1077930/ircmj-18-11-37094-i003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/8c1fc2b37fcc/ircmj-18-11-37094-i004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/317e0eb55afb/ircmj-18-11-37094-i005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/8220bdb91ee2/ircmj-18-11-37094-i006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/3e8523c71002/ircmj-18-11-37094-i001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/653c696a82c5/ircmj-18-11-37094-i002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/8feab1077930/ircmj-18-11-37094-i003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/8c1fc2b37fcc/ircmj-18-11-37094-i004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/317e0eb55afb/ircmj-18-11-37094-i005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305f/5295467/8220bdb91ee2/ircmj-18-11-37094-i006.jpg

相似文献

1
A Cost-Utility Analysis of Different Antiviral Medicine Regimens in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection.慢性丙型肝炎病毒1型感染患者不同抗病毒药物治疗方案的成本-效用分析
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 Oct 2;18(11):e37094. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.37094. eCollection 2016 Nov.
2
Cost-effectiveness of all-oral ledipasvir/sofosbuvir regimens in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.全口服来迪派韦/索磷布韦方案治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒1型感染患者的成本效益
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Mar;41(6):544-63. doi: 10.1111/apt.13081. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Modelling of Sofosbuvir-Containing Regimens for Chronic Genotype 5 Hepatitis C Virus Infection in South Africa.南非含索磷布韦方案治疗慢性5型丙型肝炎病毒感染的成本效益建模
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):403-17. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0356-x.
4
Cost-utility analysis of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C in Japan.在日本,ledipasvir/sofosbuvir治疗基因1型慢性丙型肝炎的成本效用分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jan;33(1):11-21. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1222513. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Infection in non-VA and VA Populations.非退伍军人事务部(VA)和退伍军人事务部人群中1型丙型肝炎病毒感染治疗的成本效益
MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Jul-Dec;1(1). doi: 10.1177/2381468316671946. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
6
Cost-effectiveness of daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir-based regimen for treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection in Canada.在加拿大,达卡他韦加索磷布韦方案治疗丙型肝炎病毒3型感染的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2016;19(2):181-92. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1106546. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New HCV Treatments in Egyptian Cirrhotic and Non-Cirrhotic Patients: A Societal Perspective.埃及肝硬化和非肝硬化患者新型丙型肝炎病毒治疗的成本效益分析:社会视角
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 Sep;13:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
8
Real-world cost-effectiveness of pan-genotypic Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir combination versus genotype dependent directly acting anti-viral drugs for treatment of hepatitis C patients in the universal coverage scheme of Punjab state in India.印度旁遮普邦全民医保计划中泛基因型索磷布韦-维帕他韦联合方案与基于基因型的直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎患者的真实世界成本效益比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0221769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221769. eCollection 2019.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir with and without Ribavirin in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection: a meta-analysis.在慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染患者中使用雷迪帕韦/索磷布韦联合或不联合利巴韦林的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;55:56-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.12.023. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
10
Real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir hepatitis C treatment in a single centre in Germany.德国单一中心研究索磷布韦/维帕他韦和来迪派韦/索磷布韦治疗丙型肝炎的真实世界疗效和安全性。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214795. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Analytical Modelling of Medicines in the Middle East: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Studies.中东地区药品的决策分析模型:经济评估研究的系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Apr 12. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00940-x.
2
Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness study.伊朗泛基因型通用直接作用抗病毒治疗方案治疗慢性丙型肝炎的经济性评价:成本效果研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 8;12(6):e058757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058757.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for treatment of infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD) in the Iranian pharmaceutical market.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of all-oral ledipasvir/sofosbuvir regimens in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.全口服来迪派韦/索磷布韦方案治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒1型感染患者的成本效益
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Mar;41(6):544-63. doi: 10.1111/apt.13081. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
2
Sofosbuvir vs. Combination of Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin; How Much Shall Pay for Iranian Patients?索非布韦与聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林联合用药对比;伊朗患者需支付多少费用?
Hepat Mon. 2014 Nov 23;14(11):e25540. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.25540. eCollection 2014 Nov.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sofosbuvir plus peginterferon/ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.
伊朗药品市场中用于治疗婴儿型庞贝病(IOPD)的酶替代疗法(ERT)的成本效益分析。
Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2020 Aug;9(3):130-136. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2020.03028.
4
Cost-effectiveness of treating hepatitis C in Seychelles.
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 May 15;33:26. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.26.17742. eCollection 2019.
5
Population Health and Cost-Effectiveness Implications of a "Treat All" Recommendation for HCV: A Review of the Model-Based Evidence.丙型肝炎病毒“全面治疗”建议对人群健康和成本效益的影响:基于模型证据的综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 May 24;3(1):2381468318776634. doi: 10.1177/2381468318776634. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.
6
Inactive Hepatitis B Carrier and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.非活动性乙肝携带者与妊娠结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Iran J Public Health. 2017 Apr;46(4):468-474.
索磷布韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染的成本效果分析。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Sep;40(6):657-75. doi: 10.1111/apt.12871. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
4
Predicting the outcomes of combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C using artificial neural network.使用人工神经网络预测慢性丙型肝炎患者联合治疗的结果。
Hepat Mon. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):e17028. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.17028. eCollection 2014 Jun.
5
Therapy of hepatitis C--back to the future.丙型肝炎的治疗——回归未来。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 22;370(21):2043-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1403619. Epub 2014 May 4.
6
A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand.泰国HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者药物治疗的成本效用分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 14;14:170. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-170.
7
Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection.来迪派韦索磷布韦片与索磷布韦联用治疗初治的 HCV 基因 1 型感染。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 15;370(20):1889-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402454. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
8
Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks for chronic HCV without cirrhosis.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a 联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 15;370(20):1879-88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402355. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
9
Cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based triple therapy for untreated patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C.索磷布韦为基础的三联疗法治疗初治基因 1 型慢性丙型肝炎的成本效益。
Hepatology. 2014 May;59(5):1692-705. doi: 10.1002/hep.27010. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
10
Cost analysis of sofosbuvir/ribavirin versus sofosbuvir/simeprevir for genotype 1 hepatitis C virus in interferon-ineligible/intolerant individuals.索磷布韦/利巴韦林与索磷布韦/西美瑞韦治疗无干扰素适应证/不耐受的 1 型丙型肝炎病毒的成本分析。
Hepatology. 2014 Jul;60(1):37-45. doi: 10.1002/hep.27151. Epub 2014 May 14.