Feys S, Jacquemyn Y
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2016 Dec;8(4):223-231.
In case of preterm birth in twins, it is not well established if the second twin benefits from a delayed-interval delivery.
The main objective of this systematic review is to evaluate survival benefit of the second twin from delayed interval delivery compared to the first twin. Secondly, we will evaluate the survival benefit of the procedure when performed equal to or after 24 weeks gestational age of the first born.
Delayed interval delivery was defined as every attempt to perform a delayed interval delivery with at minimum placement of a high ligature of the umbilical cord and a delay of delivery of at least 24 hours. Based on the PRISMA method, a systematic review was performed. Controlled and observational studies reporting at least 3 cases of delayed interval delivery in dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy describing the outcome of the first and the second twin were included. Case reports and papers on triplet or higher order pregnancies were excluded. Primary data included gestational age and outcome of the first and second born. Metadata concern management strategies (tocolysis, antibiotics, cerclage), neonatal data (sex, birth weight and morbidity) and maternal complications. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the "IHE quality appraisal checklist for assessing the quality of case series". Meta-analysis was performed by computing relative risk (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was tested using the and Chi statistics. Since there is no control group for the secondary outcomes, these are presented by narrative synthesis.
Mortality data were extracted from 13 articles, reporting a total of 128 cases of delayed interval delivery. In the analysis, the second born had a significantly lower mortality risk compared to the first born (relative risk = 0.44, 95% confidence interval = 0.34 - 0.57, P<0.0001, I= 0%, P=0.70). For the analysis of mortality of the second born foetus versus the first born when the first delivery was at ≥24 weeks of gestational age, 12 articles were included. In the analysis 4 reports were excluded since there were no events (no mortality) in both groups (first and second born) making analysis impossible. For the 36 cases included, the second born had a significantly lower mortality risk compared to the first born if delivery of the first born occurred at ≥ 24 weeks gestational age (relative risk=0.37, 95% confidence interval= 0.17 - 0.82, P=0.014, I=0%, P=0.82).
In carefully selected twin pregnancies the survival of the second born twin may improve with delayed interval delivery, also if the first was born at or after 24 weeks. Management protocols in the studies included vary, making it difficult to propose a uniform strategy for delayed interval delivery. Families must be informed about the possibility that a nonviable infant would survive to a periviable gestational age with a risk of severe sequels after birth as well as the possibility of maternal complications.
在双胎早产的情况下,第二胎是否能从延迟间隔分娩中获益尚未明确。
本系统评价的主要目的是评估与第一胎相比,延迟间隔分娩对第二胎生存的益处。其次,我们将评估在第一胎孕龄达到或超过24周时进行该操作的生存益处。
延迟间隔分娩定义为每次尝试进行延迟间隔分娩,至少要结扎高位脐带且分娩延迟至少24小时。基于PRISMA方法进行系统评价。纳入报告双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠中至少3例延迟间隔分娩情况并描述第一胎和第二胎结局的对照研究和观察性研究。排除病例报告以及关于三胎或更高阶妊娠的论文。主要数据包括第一胎和第二胎的孕龄及结局。元数据涉及管理策略(宫缩抑制、抗生素、宫颈环扎)、新生儿数据(性别、出生体重和发病率)以及母体并发症。使用“IHE病例系列质量评估清单”评估纳入研究的方法学质量。采用随机效应模型计算相对风险(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)进行荟萃分析。使用 和卡方统计检验统计异质性。由于次要结局没有对照组,故通过叙述性综合呈现这些结局。
从13篇文章中提取了死亡率数据,共报告128例延迟间隔分娩。分析显示,与第一胎相比,第二胎的死亡风险显著更低(相对风险 = 0.44,95%置信区间 = 0.34 - 0.57,P<0.0001,I = 0%,P = 0.70)。对于分析第一胎分娩时孕龄≥24周情况下第二胎与第一胎的死亡率,纳入了12篇文章。分析中排除了4篇报告,因为两组(第一胎和第二胎)均无事件发生(无死亡),无法进行分析。对于纳入的36例病例,如果第一胎分娩时孕龄≥24周,与第一胎相比,第二胎的死亡风险显著更低(相对风险 = 0.37,95%置信区间 = 0.17 - 0.82,P = 0.014,I = 0%,P = 0.82)。
在经过精心挑选的双胎妊娠中,延迟间隔分娩可能会提高第二胎的生存率,即使第一胎在24周及以后出生。纳入研究中的管理方案各不相同,因此难以提出统一的延迟间隔分娩策略。必须告知家庭,存在无法存活的婴儿存活至可存活孕周并在出生后有严重后遗症风险的可能性,以及存在母体并发症的可能性。