Suppr超能文献

成人远视者、正视者和近视者的周边像差。

Peripheral aberrations in adult hyperopes, emmetropes and myopes.

作者信息

Osuagwu Uchechukwu L, Suheimat Marwan, Atchison David A

机构信息

Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Mar;37(2):151-159. doi: 10.1111/opo.12354.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine differences in peripheral aberrations in hyperopic, emmetropic and myopic groups.

METHODS

Cycloplegic peripheral aberrations for 5 mm pupils were measured at 39 locations across 42° × 32° of right eye visual fields with a COAS-HD Hartmann-Shack aberrometer in nine hyperopes (mean age 29 ± 5 years, spherical equivalent refraction M + 1.47 ± 0.58 D), 20 emmetropes (28 ± 7 years, +0.06 ± 0.36 D) and 20 myopes (27 ± 6 years, -2.55 ± 1.82 D). Relative peripheral refraction error RPRE and 3rd-4th order Zernike coefficients were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Hyperopes and emmetropes had relative peripheral myopia across the visual field, with considerable nasal-temporal asymmetry for both groups and superior-inferior asymmetry for hyperopes. Myopes had minimal RPRE along the horizontal meridian, but myopic RPRE along the vertical meridian which was less than the other groups. There was little difference between groups in astigmatic components or higher-order Zernike coefficients, except for fourth-order spherical aberration which was more positive in hyperopes than in both emmetropes (mean difference ±95% CI = +0.05 ± 0.05 μm, p = 0.03) and myopes (+0.07 ± 0.04 μm, p = 0.003). Coma changed rapidly across the visual field with similar rates for all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperopes and emmetropes had greater relative peripheral myopia than myopes. There was asymmetry in RPRE along the vertical meridian for hyperopes which was not present in the emmetropes, suggesting there may be asymmetries in peripheral eye length along the vertical meridian for the former. Higher-order aberrations were affected by field eccentricity, but refractive error affected only the spherical aberration coefficient, which was more positive for hyperopes than for other groups.

摘要

目的

确定远视、正视和近视组周边像差的差异。

方法

使用COAS-HD哈特曼-夏克像差仪,在9名远视者(平均年龄29±5岁,等效球镜度M + 1.47±0.58 D)、20名正视者(28±7岁,+0.06±0.36 D)和20名近视者(27±6岁,-2.55±1.82 D)的右眼视野42°×32°范围内的39个位置测量5毫米瞳孔的睫状肌麻痹周边像差。比较各组之间的相对周边屈光误差(RPRE)和三到四阶泽尼克系数。

结果

远视者和正视者在整个视野中都存在相对周边近视,两组均存在明显的鼻颞侧不对称,远视者还存在上下不对称。近视者在水平子午线上的RPRE最小,但在垂直子午线上的近视性RPRE小于其他组。除四阶球差外,各组在散光分量或高阶泽尼克系数方面差异不大,四阶球差在远视者中比正视者(平均差异±95%CI = +0.05±0.05μm,p = 0.03)和近视者(+0.07±0.04μm,p = 0.003)更正向。所有组的彗差在整个视野中变化迅速,速率相似。

结论

远视者和正视者的相对周边近视比近视者更大。远视者在垂直子午线上的RPRE存在不对称,正视者不存在,这表明前者在垂直子午线上的周边眼轴长度可能存在不对称。高阶像差受视野偏心率影响,但屈光不正仅影响球差系数,远视者的球差系数比其他组更正向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验