• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较分析蚊虫(双翅目:蚊科:埃及伊蚊李斯特)对杀虫剂双硫磷和来源于胡椒薄荷的植物源精油的反应

Comparative analysis of mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae: Aedes aegypti Liston) responses to the insecticide Temephos and plant derived essential oil derived from Piper betle L.

机构信息

óDivision of Biopesticides and Environmental Toxicology, Sri Paramakalyani Centre for Excellence in Environmental Sciences, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Alwarkurichi, 627 412 Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.

óDivision of Biopesticides and Environmental Toxicology, Sri Paramakalyani Centre for Excellence in Environmental Sciences, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Alwarkurichi, 627 412 Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017 May;139:439-446. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.026. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.026
PMID:28213320
Abstract

Resistance to treatments with Temephos or plant derived oil, Pb-CVO, between a field collected Wild Strain (WS) and a susceptible Laboratory Strain (LS) of Ae. aegypti were measured. The Temephos (0.1mg/L) showed the greatest percentage of mosquito mortality compared to Pb-CVO (1.5mg/L) in LS Ae. aegypti. However, WS Ae. aegypti was not significantly affected by Temephos (0.1mg/L) treatment compare to the Pb-CVO (1.5mg/L). However, both strains (LS and WS) when treated with Pb-CVO (1.5mg/L) displayed steady larval mortality rate across all instars. The LC of Temephos was 0.027mg in LS, but increased in WS to 0.081mg/L. The LC of Pb-CVO treatment was observed at concentrations of 0.72 and 0.64mg/L for LS and WS strains respectively. The enzyme level of α- and β-carboxylesterase was reduced significantly in both mosquito strains treated with Pb-CVO. Whereas, there was a prominent deviation in the enzyme ratio observed between LS and WS treated with Temephos. The GST and CYP450 levels were upregulated in the LS, but decreased in WS, after treatment with Temephos. However, treatment with Pb-CVO caused both enzyme levels to increase significantly in both the strains. Visual observations of the midgut revealed cytotoxicity from sub-lethal concentrations of Temephos (0.04mg/L) and Pb-CVO (1.0mg/L) in both strains of Ae. aegypti compared to the control. The damage caused by Temephos was slightly less in WS compared to LS mosquito strains.

摘要

测定了野外采集的野生株(WS)和敏感实验室株(LS)埃及伊蚊对涕灭威或植物源油 Pb-CVO 治疗的抗性。与 LS 埃及伊蚊中的 Pb-CVO(1.5mg/L)相比,涕灭威(0.1mg/L)对蚊子的死亡率最高。然而,与 Pb-CVO(1.5mg/L)处理相比,WS 埃及伊蚊对涕灭威(0.1mg/L)处理的影响并不显著。然而,当用 Pb-CVO(1.5mg/L)处理时,两种菌株(LS 和 WS)均表现出整个龄期稳定的幼虫死亡率。LS 中的涕灭威 LC 为 0.027mg,但在 WS 中增加到 0.081mg/L。LC 观察到 LS 和 WS 菌株的 Pb-CVO 处理浓度分别为 0.72 和 0.64mg/L。用 Pb-CVO 处理后,两种蚊子的α-和β-羧酸酯酶的酶水平显著降低。然而,在用涕灭威处理的 LS 和 WS 之间观察到酶比的明显偏差。在用涕灭威处理后,LS 的 GST 和 CYP450 水平上调,但 WS 下降。然而,Pb-CVO 处理导致两种菌株的酶水平均显著增加。在用亚致死浓度的涕灭威(0.04mg/L)和 Pb-CVO(1.0mg/L)处理后,观察到 LS 和 WS 埃及伊蚊的中肠出现细胞毒性,与对照相比。与 LS 蚊子株相比,WS 蚊子株中涕灭威引起的损伤略小。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae: Aedes aegypti Liston) responses to the insecticide Temephos and plant derived essential oil derived from Piper betle L.比较分析蚊虫(双翅目:蚊科:埃及伊蚊李斯特)对杀虫剂双硫磷和来源于胡椒薄荷的植物源精油的反应
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017 May;139:439-446. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.026. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
2
Toxicological effects of chemical constituents from Piper against the environmental burden Aedes aegypti Liston and their impact on non-target toxicity evaluation against biomonitoring aquatic insects.胡椒属化学成分对环境负担埃及伊蚊的毒理学作用及其对水生昆虫生物监测的非靶标毒性评价的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Apr;25(11):10434-10446. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9714-x. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
3
Susceptibility status of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) to temephos in Venezuela.委内瑞拉埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)对特美磷的易感性状况
Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Aug;70(8):1262-6. doi: 10.1002/ps.3688. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
4
Temephos resistance and esterase activity in the mosquito Aedes aegypti in Havana, Cuba increased dramatically between 2006 and 2008.2006年至2008年间,古巴哈瓦那的埃及伊蚊对双硫磷的抗性及酯酶活性急剧增加。
Med Vet Entomol. 2011 Sep;25(3):233-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00959.x. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
5
Weekly variation on susceptibility status of Aedes mosquitoes against temephos in Selangor, Malaysia.马来西亚雪兰莪州伊蚊对特美磷易感性状况的每周变化
Trop Biomed. 2005 Dec;22(2):195-206.
6
Susceptibility of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Temephos in Thailand and Surrounding Countries.白纹伊蚊和埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)对泰国及周边国家涕灭威的敏感性。
J Med Entomol. 2020 Jul 4;57(4):1207-1220. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa035.
7
Antimosquito property of Petroselinum crispum (Umbellifereae) against the pyrethroid resistant and susceptible strains of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).皱叶欧芹(伞形科)对拟除虫菊酯抗性和敏感品系埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的驱蚊特性
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Dec;23(23):23994-24008. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7651-8. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
8
Toxicity of spinosad to temephos-resistant Aedes aegypti populations in Brazil.多杀菌素对巴西抗双硫磷埃及伊蚊种群的毒性。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0173689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173689. eCollection 2017.
9
Change in susceptibility response of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to organophosphate insecticide and Copaifera oleoresin.埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)对有机磷杀虫剂和古巴香脂的敏感性反应变化。
Acta Trop. 2021 Sep;221:106014. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106014. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Susceptibility of field-collected Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and temephos.野外采集的埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)对苏云金芽孢杆菌以色列亚种和双硫磷的敏感性。
Trop Biomed. 2010 Dec;27(3):493-503.

引用本文的文献

1
Eco-friendly bioactives from Nyctanthes arbor-tristis (L.) for targeted control of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus with reduced impact on Toxorhynchites splendens.来自夜香树(Nyctanthes arbor-tristis (L.))的环保生物活性物质用于靶向控制埃及伊蚊和致倦库蚊,同时减少对华丽巨蚊的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 2;15(1):19322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99860-6.
2
Oviposition Deterrence and Larvicidal Activity of Propyl Ether Dillapiole and Piperidyl Dillapiole Against (Diptera: Culicidae).丙基醚莳萝脑和哌啶基莳萝脑对(双翅目:蚊科)的产卵驱避和杀幼虫活性
Toxics. 2025 Apr 8;13(4):283. doi: 10.3390/toxics13040283.
3
Chemical composition and toxicity of commercial Mentha spicata and Eucalyptus citriodora essential oils on Culex quinquefasciatus and non-target insects.
商业留兰香和柠檬桉精油的化学成分和毒性对致倦库蚊和非靶标昆虫的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(14):21610-21631. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32249-6. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
Larvicidal and anti-termite activities of microbial biosurfactant produced by Enterobacter cloacae SJ2 isolated from marine sponge Clathria sp.海洋海绵 Clathria sp. 中分离出的阴沟肠杆菌 SJ2 产生的微生物生物表面活性剂的杀幼虫和抗白蚁活性
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 13;13(1):15153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42475-6.
5
Plant Essential Oils as Biopesticides: Applications, Mechanisms, Innovations, and Constraints.植物精油作为生物农药:应用、作用机制、创新与局限
Plants (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;12(16):2916. doi: 10.3390/plants12162916.
6
Larvicidal and repellent potential of Ageratum houstonianum against Culex pipiens.黄花蒿对淡色库蚊的杀幼虫和驱避活性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 10;12(1):21410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25939-z.
7
Potential of Essential Oil-Based Anticholinesterase Insecticides against Vectors: A Review.基于精油的拟胆碱酯酶杀虫剂对病媒的潜力:综述。
Molecules. 2022 Oct 18;27(20):7026. doi: 10.3390/molecules27207026.
8
Gradual reduction of susceptibility and enhanced detoxifying enzyme activities of laboratory-reared under exposure of temephos for 28 generations.在接触杀螟硫磷28代的情况下,实验室饲养的[具体昆虫名称未给出]的敏感性逐渐降低,解毒酶活性增强。
Toxicol Rep. 2021 Nov 24;8:1883-1891. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.11.013. eCollection 2021.
9
Plant-Derived Essential Oils; Their Larvicidal Properties and Potential Application for Control of Mosquito-Borne Diseases.植物源精油;它们的杀幼虫特性及在控制蚊媒疾病方面的潜在应用
Galen Med J. 2019 Aug 16;8:e1532. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v8i0.1532. eCollection 2019.
10
Bioefficacy of (L.) -Hexane Extracts and Their Major Metabolites against the Lepidopteran Pests (fab.) and Dengue Mosquito (Linn.).(L.)-己烷提取物及其主要代谢物对鳞翅目害虫(Fab.)和登革热蚊子(Linn.)的生物功效。
Molecules. 2021 Jun 17;26(12):3695. doi: 10.3390/molecules26123695.