University of Bordeaux, U1211MRGM, Bordeaux, France; INSERM, U1211MRGM, Bordeaux, France; Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo De Meis, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
University of Bordeaux, U1211MRGM, Bordeaux, France; INSERM, U1211MRGM, Bordeaux, France; CELLOMET, Bordeaux, France.
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2017 Aug;1858(8):674-685. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
The search for new drugs capable of blocking the metabolic vulnerabilities of human tumors has now entered the clinical evaluation stage, but several projects already failed in phase I or phase II. In particular, very promising in vitro studies could not be translated in vivo at preclinical stage and beyond. This was the case for most glycolysis inhibitors that demonstrated systemic toxicity. A more recent example is the inhibition of glutamine catabolism in lung adenocarcinoma that failed in vivo despite a strong addiction of several cancer cell lines to glutamine in vitro. Such contradictory findings raised several questions concerning the optimization of drug discovery strategies in the field of cancer metabolism. For instance, the cell culture models in 2D or 3D might already show strong limitations to mimic the tumor micro- and macro-environment. The microenvironment of tumors is composed of cancer cells of variegated metabolic profiles, supporting local metabolic exchanges and symbiosis, but also of immune cells and stroma that further interact with and reshape cancer cell metabolism. The macroenvironment includes the different tissues of the organism, capable of exchanging signals and fueling the tumor 'a distance'. Moreover, most metabolic targets were identified from their increased expression in tumor transcriptomic studies, or from targeted analyses looking at the metabolic impact of particular oncogenes or tumor suppressors on selected metabolic pathways. Still, very few targets were identified from in vivo analyses of tumor metabolism in patients because such studies are difficult and adequate imaging methods are only currently being developed for that purpose. For instance, perfusion of patients with [C]-glucose allows deciphering the metabolomics of tumors and opens a new area in the search for effective targets. Metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography and other techniques that do not involve [C] can also be used to evaluate tumor metabolism and to follow the efficiency of a treatment at a preclinical or clinical stage. Relevant descriptors of tumor metabolism are now required to better stratify patients for the development of personalized metabolic medicine. In this review, we discuss the current limitations in basic research and drug discovery in the field of cancer metabolism to foster the need for more clinically relevant target identification and validation. We discuss the design of adapted drug screening assays and compound efficacy evaluation methods for the discovery of innovative anti-cancer therapeutic approaches at the level of tumor energetics. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Mitochondria in Cancer, edited by Giuseppe Gasparre, Rodrigue Rossignol and Pierre Sonveaux.
寻找能够阻断人类肿瘤代谢脆弱性的新药已进入临床评估阶段,但有几个项目已在 I 期或 II 期失败。特别是在临床前阶段及以后,体外非常有前景的研究无法转化为体内。大多数糖酵解抑制剂就是如此,它们在体内表现出全身毒性。最近的一个例子是抑制肺腺癌中的谷氨酰胺分解代谢,尽管体外有几种癌细胞系强烈依赖谷氨酰胺,但在体内却失败了。这些相互矛盾的发现引发了一些关于癌症代谢领域药物发现策略优化的问题。例如,2D 或 3D 的细胞培养模型可能已经显示出很强的局限性,无法模拟肿瘤的微环境和宏环境。肿瘤的微环境由具有不同代谢特征的癌细胞组成,支持局部代谢交换和共生,但也包括免疫细胞和基质,它们进一步与癌细胞代谢相互作用并重塑其代谢。宏环境包括机体的不同组织,能够远距离交换信号并为肿瘤提供燃料。此外,大多数代谢靶点是从肿瘤转录组研究中它们的高表达或从靶向分析中确定的,靶向分析着眼于特定致癌基因或肿瘤抑制因子对选定代谢途径的代谢影响。尽管如此,由于此类研究具有难度,并且目前仅在为此目的开发适当的成像方法,因此很少从患者肿瘤代谢的体内分析中鉴定出靶点。例如,给患者灌注[C]-葡萄糖可解析肿瘤的代谢组学,并为寻找有效靶点开辟了一个新领域。正电子发射断层扫描和其他不涉及[C]的技术的代谢成像也可用于评估肿瘤代谢,并在临床前或临床阶段跟踪治疗的效率。现在需要肿瘤代谢的相关描述符,以便更好地对患者进行分层,以开发个性化代谢药物。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了癌症代谢领域基础研究和药物发现的当前局限性,以促进对更具临床相关性的靶点鉴定和验证的需求。我们讨论了适应药物筛选测定和化合物功效评估方法的设计,以在肿瘤能量学水平上发现创新的抗癌治疗方法。这篇文章是由 Giuseppe Gasparre、Rodrigue Rossignol 和 Pierre Sonveaux 编辑的题为“癌症中的线粒体”的特刊的一部分。