Litwin-Kumar Ashok, Harris Kameron Decker, Axel Richard, Sompolinsky Haim, Abbott L F
Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Neuron. 2017 Mar 8;93(5):1153-1164.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Synaptic connectivity varies widely across neuronal types. Cerebellar granule cells receive five orders of magnitude fewer inputs than the Purkinje cells they innervate, and cerebellum-like circuits, including the insect mushroom body, also exhibit large divergences in connectivity. In contrast, the number of inputs per neuron in cerebral cortex is more uniform and large. We investigate how the dimension of a representation formed by a population of neurons depends on how many inputs each neuron receives and what this implies for learning associations. Our theory predicts that the dimensions of the cerebellar granule-cell and Drosophila Kenyon-cell representations are maximized at degrees of synaptic connectivity that match those observed anatomically, showing that sparse connectivity is sometimes superior to dense connectivity. When input synapses are subject to supervised plasticity, however, dense wiring becomes advantageous, suggesting that the type of plasticity exhibited by a set of synapses is a major determinant of connection density.
突触连接在不同类型的神经元中差异很大。小脑颗粒细胞接收的输入比它们所支配的浦肯野细胞少五个数量级,并且包括昆虫蘑菇体在内的类小脑回路在连接性上也表现出很大差异。相比之下,大脑皮层中每个神经元的输入数量更加均匀且众多。我们研究了由一群神经元形成的表征维度如何取决于每个神经元接收的输入数量,以及这对学习关联意味着什么。我们的理论预测,小脑颗粒细胞和果蝇肯扬细胞表征的维度在与解剖学观察到的突触连接程度相匹配时达到最大化, 这表明稀疏连接有时优于密集连接。然而,当输入突触受到监督可塑性的影响时,密集布线变得有利,这表明一组突触所表现出的可塑性类型是连接密度的主要决定因素。