Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):879-895. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12664. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
To assess whether a combination of Internet-based and postal survey methods (mixed-mode) compared to postal-only survey methods (postal-only) leads to improved response rates in a physician survey, and to compare the cost implications of the different recruitment strategies.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: All primary care gynecologists in Bremen and Lower Saxony, Germany, were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey from January to July 2014.
The sample was divided into two strata (A; B) depending on availability of an email address. Within each stratum, potential participants were randomly assigned to mixed-mode or postal-only group.
In Stratum A, the mixed-mode group had a lower response rate compared to the postal-only group (12.5 vs. 20.2 percent; RR = 0.61, 95 percent CI: 0.44-0.87). In stratum B, no significant differences were found (15.6 vs. 16.2 percent; RR = 0.95, 95 percent CI: 0.62-1.44). Total costs (in €) per valid questionnaire returned (Stratum A: 399.72 vs. 248.85; Stratum B: 496.37 vs. 455.15) and per percentage point of response (Stratum A: 1,379.02 vs. 861.02; Stratum B 1,116.82 vs. 1,024.09) were higher, whereas variable costs were lower in mixed-mode compared to the respective postal-only groups (Stratum A cost ratio: 0.47, Stratum B cost ratio: 0.71).
In this study, primary care gynecologists were more likely to participate by traditional postal-only than by mixed-mode survey methods that first offered an Internet option. However, the lower response rate for the mixed-mode method may be partly due to the older age structure of the responding gynecologists. Variable costs per returned questionnaire were substantially lower in mixed-mode groups and indicate the potential for cost savings if the sample population is sufficiently large.
评估与仅邮寄调查方法(邮寄调查)相比,基于互联网和邮寄的混合模式调查方法是否会提高医生调查的应答率,并比较不同招募策略的成本影响。
数据来源/研究地点:2014 年 1 月至 7 月,德国不来梅和下萨克森州的所有初级保健妇科医生受邀参加横断面调查。
根据电子邮件地址的可用性,将样本分为两个层(A;B)。在每个层内,潜在参与者被随机分配到混合模式或邮寄调查组。
在 A 层,混合模式组的应答率低于邮寄调查组(12.5%比 20.2%;RR=0.61,95%CI:0.44-0.87)。在 B 层,未发现显著差异(15.6%比 16.2%;RR=0.95,95%CI:0.62-1.44)。每个有效问卷返回的总费用(欧元)(A 层:399.72 比 248.85;B 层:496.37 比 455.15)和每个应答百分比的费用(A 层:1379.02 比 861.02;B 层 1116.82 比 1024.09)均较高,而混合模式组的可变成本低于相应的邮寄调查组(A 层成本比:0.47,B 层成本比:0.71)。
在这项研究中,初级保健妇科医生更倾向于通过传统的邮寄调查方法参与,而不是通过首先提供互联网选项的混合模式调查方法。然而,混合模式方法的应答率较低可能部分归因于应答妇科医生的年龄结构较老。混合模式组每份返回问卷的可变成本要低得多,这表明如果样本足够大,可能会节省成本。