Kotelnikova Zoya
Laboratory for Studies in Economic Sociology (ZK), National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 Apr;41(4):810-819. doi: 10.1111/acer.13340. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
Alcohol is a common target of counterfeiting in Russia. Counterfeit alcohol is defined here as the manufacture, distribution, unauthorized placement (forgery) of protected commodity trademarks, and infringement of the exclusive rights of the registered trademark holders of alcoholic beverages. It is often argued that the expansion of the counterfeit product market is due to the steady demand of economically disadvantaged people for low-priced goods. The situation becomes more complicated once deceptive and nondeceptive forms of counterfeiting are taken into account. This study aimed to identify markers of risky behavior associated with the purchase of counterfeit alcohol in Russia.
The analysis relied on consumer self-reports of alcohol use and purchase collected nationwide by the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS-HSE) in 2012 to 2014. I used a generalized linear mixed-model logistic regression to identify predictors of risky behavior by consumers who purchased counterfeit alcohol, either knowingly or unknowingly, during the 30 days preceding the survey.
Purchases of counterfeit alcohol declined slightly from 2012 to 2014, mainly due to a decrease in consumers mistakenly purchasing counterfeit products. Predictors of counterfeit alcohol purchases differed between consumers who knowingly and unknowingly purchased counterfeit products. Nondeceptive purchase of counterfeit alcohol was related primarily to an indifference to alcohol brands. Consumers with social networks that include drinkers of nonbeverage alcohol and producers of homemade alcohol were highly likely to consume counterfeit alcohol deliberately. Problem drinking was significantly associated with a higher risk of both deceptive and nondeceptive purchases of counterfeit alcohol. Poverty largely contributed to nondeceptive counterfeiting.
The literature has overestimated the impact of low prices on counterfeit alcohol consumption. Problem drinking and membership in social networks of consumers of surrogate alcohol (i.e., nonbeverage) are more influential in explaining why people purchase counterfeit alcohol. Further research on these 2 factors is needed to more fully understand the purchase and consumption of counterfeit alcoholic beverages.
在俄罗斯,酒精是假冒伪劣的常见目标。假冒酒精在此被定义为酒精饮料受保护商品商标的制造、分销、未经授权放置(伪造)以及侵犯注册商标持有人的专有权。人们常认为假冒产品市场的扩张是由于经济弱势群体对低价商品的稳定需求。一旦考虑到欺骗性和非欺骗性的假冒形式,情况就变得更加复杂。本研究旨在确定俄罗斯与购买假冒酒精相关的危险行为标志物。
该分析依赖于俄罗斯纵向监测调查(RLMS - HSE)在2012年至2014年期间在全国范围内收集的消费者关于酒精使用和购买的自我报告。我使用广义线性混合模型逻辑回归来确定在调查前30天内有意或无意购买假冒酒精的消费者危险行为的预测因素。
2012年至2014年期间,假冒酒精的购买量略有下降,主要原因是消费者误购假冒产品的情况有所减少。有意和无意购买假冒产品的消费者购买假冒酒精的预测因素有所不同。非欺骗性购买假冒酒精主要与对酒精品牌的漠不关心有关。社交网络中包括非饮料酒精饮用者和自制酒精生产者的消费者极有可能故意消费假冒酒精。问题饮酒与欺骗性和非欺骗性购买假冒酒精的较高风险均显著相关。贫困在很大程度上导致了非欺骗性假冒行为。
文献高估了低价对假冒酒精消费的影响。问题饮酒以及代用酒精(即非饮料)消费者社交网络中的成员身份在解释人们购买假冒酒精的原因方面更具影响力。需要对这两个因素进行进一步研究,以更全面地了解假冒酒精饮料的购买和消费情况。