Philips Blythe H, Weisshaar Christine L, Winkelstein Beth A
University Laboratory Animal Resources, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Comp Med. 2017 Feb 1;67(1):34-42.
Although neck and low-back pain are common sources of neuropathic pain with high societal costs, the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain is not well-defined. Traditionally, most rodent pain studies rely on evoked reflex-based testing to measure pain. However, these testing methods do not reveal spontaneous pain, particularly early after injury. The rat grimace scale (RGS) for quantifying spontaneous pain has been validated after visceral, incisional, orthopedic, and inflammatory insults but not neuropathic pain. The current study used a rat model of radiculopathy to investigate the time course of RGS, the effect of the NSAID meloxicam on RGS, and the reliability and consistency of RGS across testers. RGS values at baseline and at 3, 6, 24, and 48 h after cervical nerve root compression (NRC) that induced robust evoked pain responses were compared with those obtained after sham surgery. The RGS was also evaluated at 6 h after NRC in another set of rats that had received meloxicam treatment prior to surgery. At 6 h, NRC induced higher RGS scores (1.27 ± 0.18) than did sham surgery (0.93 ± 0.20), and scores remained above baseline for as long as 48 h. Treatment with meloxicam before NRC reduced RGS at 6 h to sham levels, which were lower than those of injury without treatment. The RGS was associated with very good interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α, 0.87). These findings suggest that RGS is a useful approach to identifying and monitoring acute neuropathic pain in rats.
尽管颈部和下背部疼痛是神经性疼痛的常见来源,给社会带来高昂成本,但神经性疼痛的病理生理学仍未明确界定。传统上,大多数啮齿动物疼痛研究依靠基于诱发反射的测试来测量疼痛。然而,这些测试方法无法揭示自发疼痛,尤其是在损伤后的早期阶段。用于量化自发疼痛的大鼠面部表情评分量表(RGS)已在内脏、切口、骨科和炎症性损伤后得到验证,但在神经性疼痛方面尚未得到验证。本研究使用神经根病大鼠模型来研究RGS的时间进程、非甾体抗炎药美洛昔康对RGS的影响以及不同测试者之间RGS的可靠性和一致性。将诱导强烈诱发疼痛反应的颈神经根压迫(NRC)后基线以及3、6、24和48小时的RGS值与假手术后获得的值进行比较。在另一组术前接受美洛昔康治疗的大鼠中,在NRC后6小时也对RGS进行了评估。在6小时时,NRC诱导的RGS评分(1.27±0.18)高于假手术(0.93±0.20),并且评分在长达48小时内一直高于基线。NRC前用美洛昔康治疗可将6小时时的RGS降低至假手术水平,该水平低于未治疗损伤的水平。RGS具有非常好的观察者间可靠性(组内相关系数,0.91)和出色的内部一致性(Cronbachα,0.87)。这些发现表明,RGS是识别和监测大鼠急性神经性疼痛的一种有用方法。