Suppr超能文献

使用大鼠面部表情量表评估神经根型颈椎病模型中的神经性疼痛。

Use of the Rat Grimace Scale to Evaluate Neuropathic Pain in a Model of Cervical Radiculopathy.

作者信息

Philips Blythe H, Weisshaar Christine L, Winkelstein Beth A

机构信息

University Laboratory Animal Resources, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Comp Med. 2017 Feb 1;67(1):34-42.

Abstract

Although neck and low-back pain are common sources of neuropathic pain with high societal costs, the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain is not well-defined. Traditionally, most rodent pain studies rely on evoked reflex-based testing to measure pain. However, these testing methods do not reveal spontaneous pain, particularly early after injury. The rat grimace scale (RGS) for quantifying spontaneous pain has been validated after visceral, incisional, orthopedic, and inflammatory insults but not neuropathic pain. The current study used a rat model of radiculopathy to investigate the time course of RGS, the effect of the NSAID meloxicam on RGS, and the reliability and consistency of RGS across testers. RGS values at baseline and at 3, 6, 24, and 48 h after cervical nerve root compression (NRC) that induced robust evoked pain responses were compared with those obtained after sham surgery. The RGS was also evaluated at 6 h after NRC in another set of rats that had received meloxicam treatment prior to surgery. At 6 h, NRC induced higher RGS scores (1.27 ± 0.18) than did sham surgery (0.93 ± 0.20), and scores remained above baseline for as long as 48 h. Treatment with meloxicam before NRC reduced RGS at 6 h to sham levels, which were lower than those of injury without treatment. The RGS was associated with very good interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α, 0.87). These findings suggest that RGS is a useful approach to identifying and monitoring acute neuropathic pain in rats.

摘要

尽管颈部和下背部疼痛是神经性疼痛的常见来源,给社会带来高昂成本,但神经性疼痛的病理生理学仍未明确界定。传统上,大多数啮齿动物疼痛研究依靠基于诱发反射的测试来测量疼痛。然而,这些测试方法无法揭示自发疼痛,尤其是在损伤后的早期阶段。用于量化自发疼痛的大鼠面部表情评分量表(RGS)已在内脏、切口、骨科和炎症性损伤后得到验证,但在神经性疼痛方面尚未得到验证。本研究使用神经根病大鼠模型来研究RGS的时间进程、非甾体抗炎药美洛昔康对RGS的影响以及不同测试者之间RGS的可靠性和一致性。将诱导强烈诱发疼痛反应的颈神经根压迫(NRC)后基线以及3、6、24和48小时的RGS值与假手术后获得的值进行比较。在另一组术前接受美洛昔康治疗的大鼠中,在NRC后6小时也对RGS进行了评估。在6小时时,NRC诱导的RGS评分(1.27±0.18)高于假手术(0.93±0.20),并且评分在长达48小时内一直高于基线。NRC前用美洛昔康治疗可将6小时时的RGS降低至假手术水平,该水平低于未治疗损伤的水平。RGS具有非常好的观察者间可靠性(组内相关系数,0.91)和出色的内部一致性(Cronbachα,0.87)。这些发现表明,RGS是识别和监测大鼠急性神经性疼痛的一种有用方法。

相似文献

4
Comparing the Rat Grimace Scale and a composite behaviour score in rats.比较大鼠面部表情评分和大鼠综合行为评分。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0209467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209467. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

7
Intervertebral disc degeneration and how it leads to low back pain.椎间盘退变及其如何导致腰痛。
JOR Spine. 2022 Nov 14;6(1):e1231. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1231. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

2
The Mouse Grimace Scale: A Clinically Useful Tool?小鼠面部表情评分量表:一种临床实用工具?
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 25;10(9):e0136000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136000. eCollection 2015.
5
Ontogeny and phylogeny of facial expression of pain.疼痛面部表情的个体发生与系统发生
Pain. 2015 May;156(5):798-799. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000133.
9
Evaluation of facial expression in acute pain in cats.猫急性疼痛时面部表情的评估
J Small Anim Pract. 2014 Dec;55(12):615-21. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12283. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
10
Cervical degenerative disease: systematic review of economic analyses.颈椎退行性疾病:经济分析的系统评价
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22 Suppl 1):S53-64. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000547.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验