• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯己定预处理对修复体固位力的效果:一项 36 个月随访的随机临床试验。

Effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine in restoration retention: A 36-month follow-up randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil.

出版信息

J Dent. 2017 May;60:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.014
PMID:28237629
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the effect of the pre-treatment with 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) as coadjutant in restoration retention of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL), after 36 months of follow-up.

METHODS

A randomized controlled split-mouth and triple-blind (operators, patients and evaluator) trial was carried out. Patients (n=42) with at least two non-carious cervical lesions were included. The teeth with NCCL were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: application of 2% CHX (experimental group) or a placebo solution (control group) for 60s after acid etching and before the adhesive application. A trained and calibrated examiner evaluated the restorations at baseline (1 week) and at each recall (6, 12, 24 and 36 months) using the FDI criteria. A total of 225 restorations were evaluated after 36-month follow-up. Data were subjected to survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to evaluate the existence of differences between the survival curves (α=0.05).

RESULTS

The restorations survival rate after 36 months of follow-up was 76.1%. There was no difference in the retention and failure rates between the experimental and the control group (p=0.968). There was an increased failure trend when restorations were located subgingival compared to those at the gingival level or supragingival.

CONCLUSION

The pre-treatment with 2% chlorhexidine digluconate did not promote further restoration retention of noncarious cervical lesions.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The cavity pre-treatment with chlorhexidine for inhibition of hybrid layer degradation does not add any beneficial effect to the clinical performance of restorations.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了在 36 个月的随访后,预处理 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)作为辅助剂对非龋性颈壁缺损(NCCL)修复体保留效果的影响。

方法

进行了一项随机对照、分口和三重盲(操作人员、患者和评估者)试验。纳入至少有两个非龋性颈壁缺损的患者。将具有 NCCL 的牙齿随机分配到两个治疗组:酸蚀后和黏结剂应用前应用 2% CHX(实验组)或安慰剂溶液(对照组)60s。一名经过培训和校准的检查者使用 FDI 标准在基线(1 周)和每次随访(6、12、24 和 36 个月)时评估修复体。在 36 个月的随访后,共评估了 225 个修复体。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法进行生存分析,对数秩检验用于评估生存曲线之间的差异(α=0.05)。

结果

36 个月随访后,修复体的存活率为 76.1%。实验组和对照组的保留率和失败率无差异(p=0.968)。与龈上或龈下位置的修复体相比,位于龈下的修复体失败趋势增加。

结论

预处理 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定并没有促进非龋性颈壁缺损修复体的进一步保留。

临床意义

抑制混合层降解的窝洞预处理氯己定对修复体的临床性能没有任何有益效果。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine in restoration retention: A 36-month follow-up randomized clinical trial.氯己定预处理对修复体固位力的效果:一项 36 个月随访的随机临床试验。
J Dent. 2017 May;60:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
2
Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate on the clinical performance of adhesive restorations: a 3-year follow-up.葡萄糖酸洗必泰对粘结修复体临床性能的影响:一项3年随访研究
J Dent. 2013 Dec;41(12):1188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
3
Effect of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine on the retention of restorations: a randomized controlled trial.
Braz Dent J. 2015 May-Jun;26(3):234-41. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201300009.
4
Effect of chlorhexidine on the 18-month clinical performance of two adhesives.洗必泰对两种黏结剂 18 个月临床性能的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2013 Jun;15(3):287-92. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a29533.
5
Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.有和无咬合磨损小平面的非龋性颈部病变中树脂复合材料修复体的失败模式比较。
J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):824-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
6
Two-year clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine incorporation in two-step self-etch adhesive.洗必泰加入两步自酸蚀粘结剂中的两年临床评估
J Dent. 2015 Jan;43(1):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
7
Five-year clinical performance of the dentine deproteinization technique in non-carious cervical lesions.牙本质脱蛋白技术在非龋性颈部病变中的五年临床疗效
J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):816-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
8
Three-year prospective clinical performance of a one-step self-etch adhesive and a nanofiller hybrid resin composite in Class V lesions.一步法自酸蚀粘结剂与纳米填料复合树脂修复Ⅴ类洞的三年前瞻性临床性能研究
Am J Dent. 2014 Apr;27(2):73-8.
9
Clinical performance of preheating thermoviscous composite resin for non-carious cervical lesions restoration: A 24-month randomized clinical trial.用于非龋性颈病变修复的预热热塑复合树脂的临床性能:一项 24 个月的随机临床试验。
J Dent. 2024 May;144:104930. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104930. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
10
Effect of EDTA conditioning on cervical restorations bonded with a self-etch adhesive: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)预处理对使用自酸蚀粘结剂粘结的颈部修复体的影响:一项随机双盲临床试验。
J Dent. 2015 Sep;43(9):1175-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative evaluation of the effect of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with Everstick-reinforced composite resin: An study.基质金属蛋白酶抑制剂对经根管治疗后用Everstick增强复合树脂修复的牙齿抗折性影响的比较评价:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Nov;27(11):1104-1109. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_274_24. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Gelatinolytic activity in dentin upon adhesive treatment.牙本质在黏接处理后的明胶酶活性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 4;14(1):26618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78042-w.
3
Current approaches to produce durable biomaterials: Trends in polymeric materials for restorative dentistry applications.
制备耐用生物材料的当前方法:用于口腔修复应用的聚合材料趋势。
Dent Mater. 2024 Dec;40(12):2122-2134. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.10.004. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
4
Pomegranate extract on eroded dentin: antioxidant action, bond strength and morphology of the adhesive interface after aging.石榴提取物对侵蚀性牙本质的作用:老化后抗氧化作用、粘结强度及粘结界面形态
Restor Dent Endod. 2024 Jan 26;49(1):e9. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e9. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Comparative evaluation on the effect of different cavity disinfectant nano gels; Chlorohexidine, Propolis, Liquorice versus Diode Laser in terms of composite microleakage (comparative in vitro study).不同窝洞消毒纳米凝胶的效果比较评估;就复合树脂微渗漏而言,氯己定、蜂胶、甘草与二极管激光的比较(体外对照研究)。
BDJ Open. 2023 Nov 11;9(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41405-023-00176-2.
6
Comparative evaluation of effect of chlorhexidine application on dentin bond strength with two different adhesives after ER, CR: YSGG phototherapy: an in vitro study.两种不同黏结剂应用于 ER、CR 后牙本质黏结强度的比较评价:YSGG 光疗:一项体外研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Sep 29;38(1):224. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03878-z.
7
Evaluation of Chitosan-Oleuropein Nanoparticles on the Durability of Dentin Bonding.壳聚糖-橄榄苦苷纳米粒子对牙本质粘结耐久性的评价。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023 Jan 22;17:167-180. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S390039. eCollection 2023.
8
Dentine biomodification by sulphonamides pre-treatment: bond strength, proteolytic inhibition, and antimicrobial activity.磺胺类药物预处理对牙本质的生物修饰作用:粘结强度、蛋白水解抑制作用和抗菌活性。
J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2023 Dec;38(1):319-329. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2022.2150184.
9
Impact of Dentine Pretreatment with Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors on Bond Strength of Coronal Composite Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies.基质金属蛋白酶抑制剂预处理牙本质对冠部复合树脂修复体粘结强度的影响:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Dent. 2023 Oct;17(4):974-999. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757582. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
10
Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) Dentin adhesion - not there yet.当前关于牙黏附的观点:(1)牙本质黏附——尚未实现。
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020 Nov;56(1):190-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Sep 23.