Suppr超能文献

新诊断为局限性前列腺癌男性配偶的信息寻求与对信息来源的满意度

Information Seeking and Satisfaction with Information Sources Among Spouses of Men with Newly Diagnosed Local-Stage Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Bansal Aasthaa, Koepl Lisel M, Fedorenko Catherine R, Li Chunyu, Smith Judith Lee, Hall Ingrid J, Penson David F, Ramsey Scott D

机构信息

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.

School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98185, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2018 Apr;33(2):325-331. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1179-6.

Abstract

Information sources about prostate cancer treatment and outcomes are typically designed for patients. Little is known about the availability and utility of information for partners. The objectives of our study were to evaluate information sources used by partners to understand prostate cancer management options, their perceived usefulness, and the relationship between sources used and satisfaction with treatment experience. A longitudinal survey of female partners of men newly diagnosed with local-stage prostate cancer was conducted in three different geographic regions. Partners and associated patients were surveyed at baseline (after patient diagnosis but prior to receiving therapy) and at 12 months following diagnosis. Information sources included provider, literature, friends or family members, Internet websites, books, traditional media, and support groups. Utility of an information source was defined as whether the partner would recommend it to caregivers of other patients with local-stage prostate cancer. Our study cohort included 179 partner-patient pairs. At diagnosis, partners consulted an average of 4.6 information sources. Non-Hispanic white partners were more likely than others to use friends and family as an information source (OR = 2.44, 95% CI (1.04, 5.56)). More educated partners were less likely to use support groups (OR = 0.31, 95% CI (0.14, 0.71)). At 12-month follow-up, partners were less likely to recommend books (OR = 0.23, 95% CI (0.11, 0.49)) compared to baseline. Partners consulted a large number of information sources in researching treatment options for local-stage prostate cancer and the types of sources accessed varied by race/ethnicity and educational attainment. Additional resources to promote selection of high-quality non-provider information sources are warranted to enable partners to better aid patients in their treatment decision-making process.

摘要

有关前列腺癌治疗及治疗结果的信息来源通常是为患者设计的。对于伴侣可获取的信息及其效用,我们却知之甚少。我们研究的目的是评估伴侣用于了解前列腺癌治疗方案的信息来源、他们认为的有用性,以及所使用的信息来源与治疗体验满意度之间的关系。我们在三个不同地理区域对新诊断为局限性前列腺癌男性患者的女性伴侣进行了一项纵向调查。伴侣及其相关患者在基线时(患者确诊后但在接受治疗前)和确诊后12个月接受了调查。信息来源包括医疗服务提供者、文献、朋友或家庭成员、互联网网站、书籍、传统媒体和支持小组。信息来源的效用定义为伴侣是否会将其推荐给其他局限性前列腺癌患者的护理人员。我们的研究队列包括179对伴侣-患者组合。在确诊时,伴侣平均咨询4.6个信息来源。非西班牙裔白人伴侣比其他伴侣更有可能将朋友和家人作为信息来源(比值比=2.44,95%置信区间(1.04, 5.56))。受教育程度较高的伴侣使用支持小组的可能性较小(比值比=0.31,95%置信区间(0.14, 0.71))。在12个月的随访中,与基线相比,伴侣推荐书籍的可能性较小(比值比=0.23,95%置信区间(0.11, 0.49))。伴侣在研究局限性前列腺癌的治疗方案时会咨询大量信息来源,并且所获取的信息来源类型因种族/民族和教育程度而异。有必要提供更多资源以促进高质量非医疗服务提供者信息来源的选择,使伴侣能够更好地帮助患者进行治疗决策。

相似文献

2
Provider and partner interactions in the treatment decision-making process for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):851-6; discussion 856-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09945.x. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
5
Access to information sources and treatment considerations among men with local stage prostate cancer.
Urology. 2009 Sep;74(3):509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.090. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
6
An investigation of the support needs of men and partners throughout the prostate cancer journey.
Psychooncology. 2015 Mar;24(3):341-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.3655. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
7
Survivorship after prostate cancer treatment: spouses' quality of life at 36 months.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Nov;40(6):567-73. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.567-573.
8
Understanding Advanced Prostate Cancer Decision Making Utilizing an Interactive Decision Aid.
Cancer Nurs. 2018 Jan/Feb;41(1):2-10. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000442.

引用本文的文献

2
Stroke Survivors and Their Family Caregivers' Experiences of Health Information Seeking: A Qualitative Study.
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2022 Oct;10(4):269-278. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2022.94489.1997.
3
Identification of Psychological and Social Problems in Caregivers of Individuals Diagnosed with Hematologic Malignancy.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Jan 29;8(2):204-210. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_53_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
4
Sources of Information for Learning and Decision-Making in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.
Am J Mens Health. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):1557988320945461. doi: 10.1177/1557988320945461.
7
Treatment-related Decisional Conflict, Quality of Life, and Comorbidity in Older Adults with Cancer.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Oct-Dec;5(4):421-429. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_32_18.

本文引用的文献

1
Satisfaction with information used to choose prostate cancer treatment.
J Urol. 2014 May;191(5):1265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
3
Provider and partner interactions in the treatment decision-making process for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):851-6; discussion 856-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09945.x. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
5
Access to information sources and treatment considerations among men with local stage prostate cancer.
Urology. 2009 Sep;74(3):509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.090. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
7
Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311.
8
Living with prostate cancer: patients' and spouses' psychosocial status and quality of life.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep 20;25(27):4171-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6503. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
9
Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update.
J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2106-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.003.
10
The information-seeking behaviours of partners of men with prostate cancer: a qualitative pilot study.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Aug;54(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00212-X.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验