Shen Gordon C, Nguyen Ha Thi Hong, Das Ashis, Sachingongu Nkenda, Chansa Collins, Qamruddin Jumana, Friedman Jed
Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 West 125 Street Room 806, New York, NY, 10027, United States of America.
Health, Nutrition, and Population Global Practice, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20433, United States of America.
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Feb 28;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0179-2.
Performance-based financing (PBF) has been implemented in a number of countries with the aim of transforming health systems and improving maternal and child health. This paper examines the effect of PBF on health workers' job satisfaction, motivation, and attrition in Zambia. It uses a randomized intervention/control design to evaluate before-after changes for three groups: intervention (PBF) group, control 1 (C1; enhanced financing) group, and control 2 (C2; pure control) group.
Mixed methods are employed. The quantitative portion comprises of a baseline and an endline survey. The survey and sampling scheme were designed to allow for a rigorous impact evaluation of PBF or C1 on several key performance indicators. The qualitative portion seeks to explain the pathways underlying the observed differences through interviews conducted at the beginning and at the three-year mark of the PBF program.
Econometric analysis shows that PBF led to increased job satisfaction and decreased attrition on a subset of measures, with little effect on motivation. The C1 group also experienced some positive effects on job satisfaction. The null results of the quantitative assessment of motivation cohere with those of the qualitative assessment, which revealed that workers remain motivated by their dedication to the profession and to provide health care to the community rather than by financial incentives. The qualitative evidence also provides two explanations for higher overall job satisfaction in the C1 than in the PBF group: better working conditions and more effective supervision from the District Medical Office. The PBF group had higher satisfaction with compensation than both control groups because they have higher compensation and financial autonomy, which was intended to be part of the PBF intervention. While PBF could not address all the reasons for attrition, it did lower turnover because those health centers were staffed with qualified personnel and the personnel had role clarity.
In Zambia, the implementation of PBF schemes brought about a significant increase in job satisfaction and a decrease in attrition, but had no significant effect on motivation. Enhanced health financing also increased stated job satisfaction.
基于绩效的融资(PBF)已在许多国家实施,旨在转变卫生系统并改善孕产妇和儿童健康。本文研究了PBF对赞比亚卫生工作者工作满意度、积极性和人员流失的影响。它采用随机干预/对照设计来评估三组前后的变化:干预(PBF)组、对照1(C1;强化融资)组和对照2(C2;纯对照)组。
采用混合方法。定量部分包括基线调查和终线调查。调查和抽样方案的设计旨在对PBF或C1对几个关键绩效指标进行严格的影响评估。定性部分旨在通过在PBF计划开始时和三年期进行的访谈来解释观察到的差异背后的途径。
计量经济学分析表明,PBF在一些指标上提高了工作满意度并减少了人员流失,对积极性影响不大。C1组在工作满意度方面也有一些积极影响。对积极性的定量评估的零结果与定性评估的结果一致,定性评估表明,工作人员仍然受到他们对职业的奉献精神以及为社区提供医疗服务的激励,而不是经济激励。定性证据还为C1组总体工作满意度高于PBF组提供了两种解释:更好的工作条件和地区医疗办公室更有效的监督。PBF组对薪酬的满意度高于两个对照组,因为他们有更高的薪酬和财务自主权,这是PBF干预的一部分。虽然PBF无法解决人员流失的所有原因,但它确实降低了人员流动率,因为这些卫生中心配备了合格人员,而且人员职责明确。
在赞比亚,PBF计划的实施带来了工作满意度的显著提高和人员流失的减少,但对积极性没有显著影响。强化卫生融资也提高了工作满意度。