• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)冠状动脉血运重建患者报告结局(PROMs)试点项目的背景下,对冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQv2)进行心理测量学验证。

Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot.

机构信息

The BMJ, London, UK.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 28;7(2):e015915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915
PMID:28246146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5337713/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We tested the psychometric properties of a modified version (CROQv2) when administered in a National Health Service (NHS)/Department of Health (DH) funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation.

DESIGN

Psychometric validation study.

SETTING

11 English hospitals in the UK taking part in the NHS/DH funded pilot of PROMs for coronary revascularisation.

PARTICIPANTS

Comprehensive analyses of acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness were conducted independently for each of the prerevascularisation (n=2685 and n=3711) and postrevascularisation (n=869 and n=837) versions of the CROQ-CABG and CROQ-PCI, respectively.

RESULTS

All versions met prespecified stringent criteria for (1) acceptability of items (missing data) and scales (missing data, floor and ceiling effects, skewness); (2) tests of scaling assumptions; (3) reliability: internal consistency (Cronbach's α, item-total correlations); (4) construct validity based on within-scale analyses (internal consistency, intercorrelations between scales, factor analysis and hypothesis testing); (5) construct validity based on comparisons with external measures (convergent and discriminant validity and hypothesis testing) and (6) responsiveness. Results were also confirmed when tests were repeated on subsamples of CABG (n=639) and PCI (n=615) patients who reported receiving help completing prerevascularisation questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of a psychometrically robust procedure-specific tool that could be used as part of a large-scale coronary revascularisation PROMs programme to capture the patients' perspective of coronary revascularisation will enable outcomes important to patients to be routinely collected alongside clinical outcomes. The CROQ is suitable for administration by postal survey or the prerevascularisation versions can be administered in the clinical setting as in the Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot.

摘要

目的

冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ)是一种用于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者报告结局测量(PROM)。我们在英国国民健康服务(NHS)/卫生部(DH)资助的冠状动脉血运重建 PROM 试点项目中测试了改良版(CROQv2)的心理测量学特性。

设计

心理测量验证研究。

地点

英国 11 家参与 NHS/DH 资助的冠状动脉血运重建 PROM 试点项目的医院。

参与者

对 CROQ-CABG 和 CROQ-PCI 的血管前(分别为 2685 名和 3711 名)和血管后(分别为 869 名和 837 名)版本,分别进行了接受度、信度、效度和反应度的综合分析。

结果

所有版本均满足以下严格标准:(1)项目(缺失数据)和量表(缺失数据、下限和上限效应、偏度)的可接受性;(2)量表制定假设检验;(3)信度:内部一致性(克朗巴赫α、项目总分相关性);(4)基于量表内分析的构念效度(内部一致性、量表间相关性、因子分析和假设检验);(5)基于与外部测量值比较的构念效度(收敛和判别效度和假设检验)和(6)反应性。当在接受过 CABG(n=639)和 PCI(n=615)患者亚组中重复测试时,也得到了相同的结果,这些患者报告在填写血管前问卷时得到了帮助。

结论

有了一种心理测量学上可靠的特定于手术的工具,该工具可作为大规模冠状动脉血运重建 PROM 项目的一部分,用于获取患者对冠状动脉血运重建的看法,这将使重要的患者结局能够与临床结局一起得到常规收集。CROQ 适合通过邮寄调查进行管理,或者可以在临床环境下管理血管前版本,就像在冠状动脉血运重建 PROM 试点项目中那样。

相似文献

1
Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot.在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)冠状动脉血运重建患者报告结局(PROMs)试点项目的背景下,对冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQv2)进行心理测量学验证。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 28;7(2):e015915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915.
2
Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire.《冠状动脉血运重建结果问卷》挪威语版本的翻译与验证
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jan;17(1):36-44. doi: 10.1177/1474515117715841. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty.冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ):一种基于患者的冠状动脉搭桥手术和血管成形术新结局测量方法的开发与验证
Heart. 2004 Dec;90(12):1460-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.021899.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) in Norwegian patients admitted to elective coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention.挪威择期冠状动脉造影和可能行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ)的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 5;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01927-9.
5
Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version.冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷:塞尔维亚语版本的验证研究
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1883-1895. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03064-0. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
6
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire.韩文版冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷的信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 15;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0615-y.
7
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
8
Translation, adaptation and validation of the Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire into Greek.《冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷》翻译成希腊语、改编及验证。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Apr;15(2):134-41. doi: 10.1177/1474515115592250. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
9
The Malay version of SF-36 health survey instrument: testing data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity in post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery patients at the National Heart Institute (Institut Jantung Negara-IJN), Kuala Lumpur.马来语版 SF-36 健康调查工具:在吉隆坡国家心脏研究所(National Heart Institute,IJN)进行冠状动脉旁路移植(coronary artery bypass grafting,CABG)手术后患者中的测试数据质量、定标假设、信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 9;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01658-9.
10
Translation and validation study of the Japanese versions of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ-J).冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ-J)日译本的翻译和验证研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Mar;10(1):22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCIs) on Health Outcomes from a Jordanian Patient's Perspective.从约旦患者角度看经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对健康结局的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;13(13):1491. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131491.
2
Outcome Monitoring After Cardiac Surgery (OMACS): a single-centre prospective cohort study of cardiac surgery patients.心脏手术后结局监测(OMACS):一项针对心脏手术患者的单中心前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 19;12(12):e063268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063268.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) in Norwegian patients admitted to elective coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention.挪威择期冠状动脉造影和可能行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ)的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 5;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01927-9.
4
Raising the profile of pilot and feasibility studies in relation to the development, evaluation and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures.提高与患者报告结局测量的开发、评估和实施相关的试点研究和可行性研究的关注度。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Jun 17;4:3. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0151-x. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Family and professionals underestimate quality of life across diverse cultures and health conditions: systematic review.家庭和专业人员低估了不同文化和健康状况下的生活质量:系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):584-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
2
Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples.运用经典测试理论、项目反应理论和拉施测量理论评估患者报告的结局指标:实例比较
Value Health. 2015 Jan;18(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.005.
3
Overview of classical test theory and item response theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures.开发患者报告结局指标时用于项目定量评估的经典测试理论和项目反应理论概述。
Clin Ther. 2014 May;36(5):648-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 May 5.
4
An introduction to item response theory for patient-reported outcome measurement.患者报告结局测量的项目反应理论介绍。
Patient. 2014;7(1):23-35. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0041-0.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ-5D data.NHS 中的患者报告结局测量:分析和报告 EQ-5D 数据的新方法。
Health Econ. 2010 Aug;19(8):886-905. doi: 10.1002/hec.1608.
6
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.行业指南:患者报告的结局指标:用于医疗产品开发以支持标签声明:指南草案
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-79.
7
Responsiveness of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire compared with the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire.与SF-36和西雅图心绞痛问卷相比,冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷的反应度
Qual Life Res. 2006 Aug;15(6):1069-78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-5993-7.
8
Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality.问卷发放方式会对数据质量产生严重影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Sep;27(3):281-91. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi031. Epub 2005 May 3.
9
Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty.冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ):一种基于患者的冠状动脉搭桥手术和血管成形术新结局测量方法的开发与验证
Heart. 2004 Dec;90(12):1460-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.021899.
10
Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease-I: assessment tools.冠心病患者的生活质量 - I:评估工具
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Sep 10;1:42. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-42.