• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩文版冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire.

作者信息

Kim Minju, Seo JiYeong, Hwang Jin-Yong, Park Ki Soo

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Dong-A University, 32 Daesingonwon-ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 49201, Korea.

College of Nursing, Catholic University of Pusan, 57 Oryundae-ro, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, 46252, Korea.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 15;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0615-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-017-0615-y
PMID:28202043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5311852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with ischemic heart disease have increased drastically, and their health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has been increasingly important. The Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a widely used tool to assess the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study was to rigorously examine the psychometric properties of the CROQ in patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

The CROQ was translated into Korean. A total of 209 patients before PCI and 169 patients after PCI were recruited from a university hospital in Korea and completed questionnaires. In terms of statistical analyses, internal consistency, concurrent validity with using the Short Form 12 (SF-12) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-Korean version (SAQ-K), and construct validity using exploratory factor analysis were assessed. Effective size statistics were calculated.

RESULTS

The internal consistency coefficients for all subscales of the CROQ were above 0.70, except the domain of adverse effects. The concurrent validity was mostly supported by the pattern of association among CROQ-K, SAQ-K, and SF-12. The results of EFA showed the core items of the CROQ had 7 factors. Large effect sizes were observed for the symptoms and the psychosocial functioning scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The Korean version of the CROQ is a valid and reliable scale for assessing HRQOL in patients with coronary artery disease.

摘要

背景

缺血性心脏病患者数量急剧增加,其健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)愈发重要。冠状动脉血运重建结果问卷(CROQ)是评估冠心病患者生活质量的常用工具。本研究旨在严格检验CROQ在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者中的心理测量特性。

方法

将CROQ翻译成韩语。从韩国一家大学医院招募了209例PCI术前患者和169例PCI术后患者,并完成问卷调查。在统计分析方面,评估了内部一致性、与简短健康调查问卷12项版本(SF - 12)和韩国版西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ - K)的同时效度,以及使用探索性因素分析的结构效度。计算了效应量统计值。

结果

CROQ所有子量表的内部一致性系数均高于0.70,但不良反应领域除外。CROQ - K、SAQ - K和SF - 12之间的关联模式大多支持同时效度。探索性因素分析结果显示CROQ的核心项目有7个因素。在症状和心理社会功能量表上观察到较大的效应量。

结论

韩语版CROQ是评估冠心病患者HRQOL的有效且可靠的量表。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire.韩文版冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷的信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 15;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0615-y.
2
Translation and validation study of the Japanese versions of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ-J).冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ-J)日译本的翻译和验证研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Mar;10(1):22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 May 10.
3
Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire.《冠状动脉血运重建结果问卷》挪威语版本的翻译与验证
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jan;17(1):36-44. doi: 10.1177/1474515117715841. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
4
Translation, adaptation and validation of the Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire into Greek.《冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷》翻译成希腊语、改编及验证。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Apr;15(2):134-41. doi: 10.1177/1474515115592250. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) in Norwegian patients admitted to elective coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention.挪威择期冠状动脉造影和可能行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ)的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 5;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01927-9.
6
Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot.在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)冠状动脉血运重建患者报告结局(PROMs)试点项目的背景下,对冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQv2)进行心理测量学验证。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 28;7(2):e015915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015915.
7
Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version.冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷:塞尔维亚语版本的验证研究
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1883-1895. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03064-0. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
8
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the MacNew heart disease Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire.《MacNew 心脏病健康相关生活质量问卷韩文版的信度和效度》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Aug 14;19(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01832-7.
9
Responsiveness of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire compared with the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire.与SF-36和西雅图心绞痛问卷相比,冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷的反应度
Qual Life Res. 2006 Aug;15(6):1069-78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-5993-7.
10
Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty.冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ):一种基于患者的冠状动脉搭桥手术和血管成形术新结局测量方法的开发与验证
Heart. 2004 Dec;90(12):1460-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.021899.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) in Norwegian patients admitted to elective coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention.挪威择期冠状动脉造影和可能行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷(CROQ)的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 5;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01927-9.
2
Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version.冠状动脉血运重建结局问卷:塞尔维亚语版本的验证研究
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1883-1895. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03064-0. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
3
Relationships among medication adherence, lifestyle modification, and health-related quality of life in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional study.急性心肌梗死患者药物依从性、生活方式改变与健康相关生活质量的关系:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 22;16(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0921-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with diabetes.冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在老年糖尿病患者中的疗效比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Nov;32(11):1891-1898. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1219708. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
2
Comparison of the Postprocedural Quality of Life between Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review.冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后生活质量的比较:一项系统评价
Cardiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:7842514. doi: 10.1155/2016/7842514. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Burden and Prevention of Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with Concomitant Chronic Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease: A Literature Review.合并慢性心力衰竭和冠状动脉疾病患者心脏不良事件的负担与预防:文献综述
Cardiovasc Ther. 2016 Jun;34(3):152-60. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12180.
4
Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Chinese population.经皮冠状动脉造影和介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路:中国人群随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):17151-66. eCollection 2015.
5
Association of smoking status with health-related outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后吸烟状况与健康相关结局的关联。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002226.
6
Incidence and outcome of surgical procedures after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with those after percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2.冠状动脉旁路移植术后与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后外科手术的发生率及转归:来自京都PCI/CABG注册队列2的冠状动脉血运重建疗效研究报告
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(4):482-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001056. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
7
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对多支血管病变患者长期死亡率和发病率的影响:动脉搭桥和支架时代随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):223-30. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12844.
8
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010.
9
Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中动脉入路选择对结果的影响:随机临床试验的结果能否在临床实践中实现?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):698-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.比较冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干和/或三血管病变:SYNTAX 试验 3 年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(17):2125-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213. Epub 2011 Jun 22.