Tseng Chao-Ming, Lin I-Chang, Chang Chi-Yang, Wang Hsiu-Po, Chen Chih-Cheng, Mo Lein-Ray, Lin Jaw-Town, Tai Chi-Ming
Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Taiwan Association for the Study of Small Intestinal Diseases, Taoyuan city, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 1;12(3):e0172754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172754. eCollection 2017.
The role of computed tomography angiography (CTA) on the management of acute overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) remains unclear. We designed a study to evaluate the impact of CTA before enteroscopy for acute overt OGIB.
All patients undergoing CTA followed by enteroscopy for acute overt OGIB were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical characteristics and diagnosis were compared between patients with positive and negative CTA findings. We evaluated the impact of CTA on subsequent enteroscopy.
From February 2008 to March 2015, 71 patients including 25 patients with positive CTA findings and 46 patients with negative CTA findings, were enrolled. All 25 patients with positive CTA findings were confirmed to have mid GI lesions, a significantly higher proportion than among patients with negative CTA findings (100% vs. 52.2%, respectively; P <0.001). CTA had a higher diagnostic yield for bleeding from tumor origin than from non-tumor origin (80.0% vs. 23.7%, respectively; P <0.001). The diagnostic yield of CTA and enteroscopy was 35.2% and 73.2%, respectively. The lesions could be identified by the initial route of enteroscopy in more patients with positive CTA findings than in those with negative CTA findings (92.0% vs. 47.8%, respectively; P <0.001). Lesions could be identified in seven of the 25 patients (28.0%) with positive CTA findings by using only push enteroscopy instead of single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE), but all 46 patients with negative CTA findings needed SBE for deep small-bowel examination.
CTA is useful in the diagnosis of acute overt OGIB, especially in patients with bleeding from tumors. In addition, it also can show the precise location of bleeding, and guide subsequent enteroscopic management.
计算机断层血管造影(CTA)在急性显性不明原因胃肠道出血(OGIB)管理中的作用仍不明确。我们设计了一项研究来评估CTA在急性显性OGIB患者进行肠镜检查前的影响。
所有接受CTA检查并随后进行肠镜检查以诊断急性显性OGIB的患者纳入本回顾性研究。比较CTA结果阳性和阴性患者的临床特征及诊断情况。我们评估了CTA对后续肠镜检查的影响。
2008年2月至2015年3月,共纳入71例患者,其中CTA结果阳性25例,阴性46例。所有25例CTA结果阳性的患者均被证实存在中消化道病变,这一比例显著高于CTA结果阴性的患者(分别为100%和52.2%;P<0.001)。CTA对肿瘤源性出血的诊断率高于非肿瘤源性出血(分别为80.0%和23.7%;P<0.001)。CTA和肠镜检查的诊断率分别为35.2%和73.2%。与CTA结果阴性的患者相比,更多CTA结果阳性的患者通过初次肠镜检查途径就能发现病变(分别为92.0%和47.8%;P<0.001)。在25例CTA结果阳性的患者中,仅使用推进式肠镜而非单气囊肠镜(SBE)就能在7例患者(28.0%)中发现病变,但所有46例CTA结果阴性的患者都需要SBE进行深部小肠检查。
CTA对急性显性OGIB的诊断有用,尤其是对肿瘤出血患者。此外,它还能显示出血的精确位置,并指导后续的肠镜管理。