Khan Mariam, Ilcisin Misja, Saxton Katherine
Public Health Program, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA, 95053, USA.
Department of Biology, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA, 95053, USA.
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 4;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0532-z.
The theory of fundamental causes explains why health disparities persist over time, even as risk factors, mechanisms, and diseases change. Using an intersectional framework, we evaluated multifactorial discrimination as a fundamental cause of mental health disparities.
Using baseline data from the Project STRIDE: Stress, Identity, and Mental Health study, we examined the health effects of discrimination among individuals who self-identified as lesbian, gay, or bisexual. We used logistic and linear regression to assess whether multifactorial discrimination met the four criteria designating a fundamental cause, namely that the cause: 1) influences multiple health outcomes, 2) affects multiple risk factors, 3) involves access to resources that can be leveraged to reduce consequences of disease, and 4) reproduces itself in varied contexts through changing mechanisms.
Multifactorial discrimination predicted high depression scores, psychological well-being, and substance use disorder diagnosis. Discrimination was positively associated with risk factors for high depression scores: chronic strain and total number of stressful life events. Discrimination was associated with significantly lower levels of mastery and self-esteem, protective factors for depressive symptomatology. Even after controlling for risk factors, discrimination remained a significant predictor for high depression scores. Among subjects with low depression scores, multifactorial discrimination also predicted anxiety and aggregate mental health scores.
Multifactorial discrimination should be considered a fundamental cause of mental health inequities and may be an important cause of broad health disparities among populations with intersecting social identities.
根本原因理论解释了为何即便风险因素、机制和疾病发生变化,健康差距仍长期存在。我们运用交叉性框架,将多因素歧视评估为心理健康差距的一个根本原因。
利用“大步向前项目:压力、身份认同与心理健康研究”的基线数据,我们考察了自我认定为女同性恋、男同性恋或双性恋的个体中歧视对健康的影响。我们使用逻辑回归和线性回归来评估多因素歧视是否符合指定为根本原因的四个标准,即该原因:1)影响多种健康结果;2)影响多种风险因素;3)涉及获取可用于减轻疾病后果的资源;4)通过不断变化的机制在不同情境中自我复制。
多因素歧视预示着高抑郁评分、心理健康状况以及物质使用障碍诊断。歧视与高抑郁评分的风险因素呈正相关:慢性压力和应激性生活事件总数。歧视与掌控感和自尊水平显著较低相关,而掌控感和自尊是抑郁症状的保护因素。即使在控制了风险因素之后,歧视仍是高抑郁评分的一个显著预测因素。在抑郁评分较低的受试者中,多因素歧视也预示着焦虑和总体心理健康评分。
多因素歧视应被视为心理健康不平等的一个根本原因,并可能是具有交叉社会身份的人群中广泛健康差距的一个重要原因。