Noguchi Remi, Sekizawa Yoichi, So Mirai, Yamaguchi Sosei, Shimizu Eiji
Department of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, 1-3-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8901, Japan.
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 4;17(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1248-8.
Notwithstanding a high expectation for internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) for reducing depressive symptoms, many of iCBT programs have limitations such as temporary effects and high drop-out rates, possibly due to their complexity. We examined the effects of a free, simplified, 5-minute iCBT program by comparing it with a simplified emotion-focused mindfulness (sEFM) exercise and with a waiting list control group.
A total of 974 participants, who were recruited using the website of a market research company, were randomly assigned to the iCBT group, the sEFM group, and the control group. Those in the intervention arms performed each exercise for 5 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D) at postintervention. Secondary outcome measures were the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7). Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.
During postintervention assessment, there were no significant differences between the intervention arms and the control group in the CES-D, although the difference between the iCBT arm and control group was close to significance (p = 0.05) in favor of iCBT. There was a significant difference in the PHQ-9 in favor of the sEFM group compared with the control group. There were no significant differences in outcome measures between the three groups at the 6-week follow-up.
Although both iCBT and sEFM have the potential to temporarily reduce depressive symptoms, substantial improvements are required to enhance and maintain their effects.
This trial is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR) (ID: UMIN000015097 ) on 1 October 2014.
尽管基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT)在减轻抑郁症状方面被寄予厚望,但许多iCBT项目存在局限性,如效果短暂和高辍学率,这可能是由于其复杂性所致。我们通过将一个免费、简化的5分钟iCBT项目与简化的以情绪为中心的正念(sEFM)练习以及等待列表对照组进行比较,来研究其效果。
通过市场研究公司的网站招募了总共974名参与者,将他们随机分配到iCBT组、sEFM组和对照组。干预组的参与者进行每项练习为期5周。主要结局指标是干预后的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)。次要结局指标是患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和广泛性焦虑障碍-7量表(GAD-7)。进行意向性分析。
在干预后评估期间,CES-D在干预组和对照组之间没有显著差异,尽管iCBT组和对照组之间的差异接近显著(p = 0.05),有利于iCBT。与对照组相比,PHQ-9在有利于sEFM组方面存在显著差异。在6周随访时,三组之间的结局指标没有显著差异。
尽管iCBT和sEFM都有可能暂时减轻抑郁症状,但需要大幅改进以增强和维持其效果。
本试验于2014年10月1日在UMIN临床试验注册中心(UMIN-CTR)注册(ID:UMIN000015097)。