• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦香烟最低包装价格政策对美国香烟使用的影响。

The impact of a federal cigarette minimum pack price policy on cigarette use in the USA.

机构信息

College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):203-208. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053457. Epub 2017 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053457
PMID:28259846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5583019/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing cigarette prices reduce cigarette use. The US Food and Drug Administration has the authority to regulate the sale and promotion-and therefore the price-of tobacco products.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the potential effect of federal minimum price regulation on the sales of cigarettes in the USA.

METHOD

We used yearly state-level data from the Tax Burden on Tobacco and other sources to model per capita cigarette sales as a function of price. We used the fitted model to compare the status quo sales with counterfactual scenarios in which a federal minimum price was set. The minimum price scenarios ranged from $0 to $12.

RESULTS

The estimated price effect in our model was comparable with that found in the literature. Our counterfactual analyses suggested that the impact of a minimum price requirement could range from a minimal effect at the $4 level to a reduction of 5.7 billion packs sold per year and 10 million smokers at the $10 level.

CONCLUSION

A federal minimum price policy has the potential to greatly benefit tobacco control and public health by uniformly increasing the price of cigarettes and by eliminating many price-reducing strategies currently available to both sellers and consumers.

摘要

背景

提高香烟价格可减少香烟使用。美国食品和药物管理局有权监管烟草产品的销售和促销,从而控制其价格。

目的

研究联邦最低价格监管对美国香烟销售的潜在影响。

方法

我们使用来自税收负担烟草和其他来源的每年州级数据,根据价格建立人均香烟销售量的模型。我们使用拟合模型将现状销售与设定联邦最低价格的假设情景进行比较。最低价格情景范围从 0 美元到 12 美元。

结果

我们模型中的估计价格效应与文献中的发现相当。我们的假设情景分析表明,最低价格要求的影响范围从 4 美元水平的最小影响到 10 美元水平每年减少 57 亿包的销售量和 1000 万烟民。

结论

联邦最低价格政策有可能通过统一提高香烟价格并消除销售者和消费者目前可用的许多降价策略,极大地有益于烟草控制和公共卫生。

相似文献

1
The impact of a federal cigarette minimum pack price policy on cigarette use in the USA.联邦香烟最低包装价格政策对美国香烟使用的影响。
Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):203-208. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053457. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
2
[Application of the cigarette purchase tasks in achieving China' s tobacco control goals].[香烟购买任务在实现中国烟草控制目标中的应用]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jun 18;56(3):479-486. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.03.015.
3
Impact of cigarette minimum price laws on the retail price of cigarettes in the USA.香烟最低限价法对美国香烟零售价格的影响。
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e78-85. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050554. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
4
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.低收入吸烟者对价格更敏感吗?:来自韩国香烟税上调的证据。
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
Comparing projected impacts of cigarette floor price and excise tax policies on socioeconomic disparities in smoking.比较香烟最低限价和消费税政策对吸烟方面社会经济差异的预期影响。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i60-i66. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053230.
6
Tobacco product prices before and after a statewide tobacco tax increase.全州烟草税提高前后的烟草产品价格。
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):166-73. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052018. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
7
Sales Trends in Price-Discounted Cigarettes, Large Cigars, Little Cigars, and Cigarillos-United States, 2011-2016.价格折扣卷烟、大雪茄、小雪茄和小雪茄销售趋势-美国,2011-2016 年。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Sep 25;20(11):1401-1406. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx249.
8
The impact of cigarette cost on pack sales per capita consumption in the United States.美国香烟成本对人均消费包销量的影响。
Public Health. 2024 Jun;231:116-123. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.023. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
9
Simulating the Impact of a Cigarette Minimum Floor Price Law on Adult Smoking Prevalence in California.模拟加利福尼亚州实施香烟最低底价法对成人吸烟率的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):1842-1850. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa046.
10
Changes to the littered cigarette pack environment in New York City between 2011 and 2015.2011 年至 2015 年间,纽约市乱扔的香烟盒环境的变化。
Tob Control. 2020 May;29(3):326-331. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054909. Epub 2019 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Reactions to Pictorial and Text Cigarette Pack Warning Labels among Chinese Smokers.中国烟民对图片和文字香烟包装警示标签的反应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 7;19(18):11253. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811253.
2
The Short-Term and Long-Term Associations Between Receiving Tobacco Discounts or Coupons and Smoking Cessation Among U.S. Adult Cigarette Smokers With Intention to Quit.接受烟草折扣或优惠券与美国有戒烟意愿的成年吸烟者戒烟的短期和长期关联。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Mar 22;25(4):699-708. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac216.
3
Tobacco Couponing: A Systematic Review of Exposures and Effects on Tobacco Initiation and Cessation.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing projected impacts of cigarette floor price and excise tax policies on socioeconomic disparities in smoking.比较香烟最低限价和消费税政策对吸烟方面社会经济差异的预期影响。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i60-i66. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053230.
2
Do state minimum markup/price laws work? Evidence from retail scanner data and TUS-CPS.州最低加价/价格法有效吗?来自零售扫描仪数据和美国消费者支出调查(TUS-CPS)的证据。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i52-i59. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053093.
3
Estimating the Impact of Raising Prices and Eliminating Discounts on Cigarette Smoking Prevalence in the United States.
烟草优惠券:对吸烟起始和戒烟的暴露和影响的系统评价。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):1523-1533. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac037.
4
Research on lung cancer and its funding, 2004-2018.2004 - 2018年肺癌研究及其资金情况
Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 Nov 3;14:1132. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1132. eCollection 2020.
5
A framework for identifying and mitigating the equity harms of COVID-19 policy interventions.确定和减轻 COVID-19 政策干预措施造成的公平损害的框架。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;128:35-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
6
Using point-of-sale data to examine tobacco pricing across neighbourhoods in Scotland.利用销售点数据研究苏格兰各社区的烟草定价情况。
Tob Control. 2021 Mar;30(2):168-176. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055484. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Simulating the Impact of a Cigarette Minimum Floor Price Law on Adult Smoking Prevalence in California.模拟加利福尼亚州实施香烟最低底价法对成人吸烟率的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):1842-1850. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa046.
8
Tobacco manufacturer lobbying to undercut minimum price laws: an analysis of internal industry documents.烟草制造商游说以削弱最低价格法:对行业内部文件的分析。
Tob Control. 2020 Dec;29(e1):e10-e17. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055354. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
Comparison of Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure between Premium and Discount Brand Cigarette Smokers in the NHANES 2011-2012 Special Sample.《NHANES 2011-2012 特采样本中优质品牌和折扣品牌卷烟吸烟者体内烟草暴露生物标志物的比较》
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 May;27(5):601-609. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0869. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
SBM recommends policy support to reduce smoking disparities for sexual and gender minorities.SBM 建议提供政策支持,以减少性少数群体和性别少数群体在吸烟方面的差异。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Sep 8;8(5):692-695. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx017.
评估提高价格和取消折扣对美国吸烟率的影响。
Public Health Rep. 2016 Jul-Aug;131(4):536-43. doi: 10.1177/0033354916662211.
4
Beyond excise taxes: a systematic review of literature on non-tax policy approaches to raising tobacco product prices.除消费税之外:关于提高烟草产品价格的非税收政策方法的文献系统综述
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):377-85. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052294. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Economic Impact of Tobacco Price Increases Through Taxation: A Community Guide Systematic Review.通过税收提高烟草价格的经济影响:《社区指南》系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):800-808. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
6
The impact of an increase in excise tax on the retail price of tobacco in New Zealand.消费税上调对新西兰烟草零售价格的影响。
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):458-63. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052259. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
The impact of the Malaysian minimum cigarette price law: findings from the ITC Malaysia Survey.马来西亚最低卷烟价格法的影响:马来西亚烟草控制调查的结果
Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24 Suppl 3(0 3):iii83-iii87. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052028. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
Reducing tobacco use and access through strengthened minimum price laws.通过强化最低价格法规减少烟草使用和获取。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Oct;104(10):1844-50. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302069. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
9
Predicting decreases in smoking with a cigarette purchase task: evidence from an excise tax rise in New Zealand.通过香烟购买任务预测吸烟量的下降:来自新西兰消费税上调的证据。
Tob Control. 2015 Nov;24(6):582-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051594. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
10
Can you refuse these discounts? An evaluation of the use and price discount impact of price-related promotions among US adult smokers by cigarette manufacturers.你能拒绝这些折扣吗?美国成年吸烟者中香烟制造商与价格相关促销活动的使用情况及价格折扣影响评估。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 4;4(6):e004685. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004685.