Tzounakas Vassilis L, Kriebardis Anastasios G, Seghatchian Jerard, Papassideri Issidora S, Antonelou Marianna H
Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), School of Sciences, Athens, Greece.
Department of Medical Laboratories, Faculty of Health and Caring Professions, Technological and Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Blood Transfus. 2017 Mar;15(2):126-130. doi: 10.2450/2017.0313-16.
What is following the impressive progress that has been made? During the last couple of years several tremors have shaken the field of Transfusion Medicine. The epicentres of those tremors were located on novel insights into the RBC storage lesion, on emerging connections between storage lesion and post-transfusion performance and effects, and on acknowledging that storage time is only one (rather than the most prominent) of the parameters which contribute to the progression of storage lesion in any given unit of blood. The optimisation of bio-preservation conditions emerged at the same time with all-new scientific knowledge gained by advances in research tools, implementation of technological innovations, and application of elegant in vitro and in vivo models of transfusion. Simultaneously, one after another, all the reported randomised clinical trials concluded, with spectacular consensus, that there is no significant difference in the rate of adverse clinical events (including death) among patients who underwent transfusion with fresh (and presumably good) or standard of care (and presumably bad) blood. The comparative analysis and comprehension of the aforementioned data would set the context for the next generation of research in blood transfusion science, since the need for safer and more efficient transfusions remains.
在取得令人瞩目的进展之后,接下来会怎样呢?在过去几年里,输血医学领域发生了几次震动。这些震动的震中位于对红细胞储存损伤的新见解、储存损伤与输血后性能及效果之间新出现的联系,以及认识到储存时间只是导致任何给定单位血液中储存损伤进展的参数之一(而非最突出的参数)。生物保存条件的优化与研究工具的进步、技术创新的实施以及优雅的输血体外和体内模型的应用所获得的全新科学知识同时出现。与此同时,所有报告的随机临床试验相继得出了惊人一致的结论:接受新鲜(可能质量好)或标准护理(可能质量差)血液输血的患者中,不良临床事件(包括死亡)发生率没有显著差异。对上述数据的比较分析和理解将为输血科学的下一代研究奠定背景,因为对更安全、更高效输血的需求依然存在。