Folland Jonathan P, Allen Sam J, Black Matthew I, Handsaker Joseph C, Forrester Stephanie E
1School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UNITED KINGDOM; 2MAS Innovation, Colombo, SRI LANKA; and 3Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UNITED KINGDOM.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jul;49(7):1412-1423. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001245.
Despite an intuitive relationship between technique and both running economy (RE) and performance, and the diverse techniques used by runners to achieve forward locomotion, the objective importance of overall technique and the key components therein remain to be elucidated.
This study aimed to determine the relationship between individual and combined kinematic measures of technique with both RE and performance.
Ninety-seven endurance runners (47 females) of diverse competitive standards performed a discontinuous protocol of incremental treadmill running (4-min stages, 1-km·h increments). Measurements included three-dimensional full-body kinematics, respiratory gases to determine energy cost, and velocity of lactate turn point. Five categories of kinematic measures (vertical oscillation, braking, posture, stride parameters, and lower limb angles) and locomotory energy cost (LEc) were averaged across 10-12 km·h (the highest common velocity < velocity of lactate turn point). Performance was measured as season's best (SB) time converted to a sex-specific z-score.
Numerous kinematic variables were correlated with RE and performance (LEc, 19 variables; SB time, 11 variables). Regression analysis found three variables (pelvis vertical oscillation during ground contact normalized to height, minimum knee joint angle during ground contact, and minimum horizontal pelvis velocity) explained 39% of LEc variability. In addition, four variables (minimum horizontal pelvis velocity, shank touchdown angle, duty factor, and trunk forward lean) combined to explain 31% of the variability in performance (SB time).
This study provides novel and robust evidence that technique explains a substantial proportion of the variance in RE and performance. We recommend that runners and coaches are attentive to specific aspects of stride parameters and lower limb angles in part to optimize pelvis movement, and ultimately enhance performance.
尽管技术与跑步经济性(RE)和成绩之间存在直观的关系,且跑步者为实现向前运动采用了多种技术,但整体技术及其关键组成部分的客观重要性仍有待阐明。
本研究旨在确定技术的个体和综合运动学指标与RE和成绩之间的关系。
97名不同竞技水平的耐力跑者(47名女性)进行了不连续的递增跑步机跑步方案(4分钟阶段,每小时递增1公里)。测量包括三维全身运动学、用于确定能量消耗的呼吸气体以及乳酸拐点速度。在10 - 12公里/小时(最高共同速度<乳酸拐点速度)范围内,对五类运动学指标(垂直振荡、制动、姿势、步幅参数和下肢角度)和运动能量消耗(LEc)进行平均。成绩以赛季最佳(SB)时间转换为性别特异性z分数来衡量。
许多运动学变量与RE和成绩相关(LEc,19个变量;SB时间,11个变量)。回归分析发现三个变量(着地时骨盆垂直振荡相对于身高的归一化值、着地时最小膝关节角度和最小骨盆水平速度)解释了LEc变异性的39%。此外,四个变量(最小骨盆水平速度、小腿触地角度、负荷因子和躯干前倾)共同解释了成绩(SB时间)变异性的31%。
本研究提供了新颖且有力的证据,表明技术在很大程度上解释了RE和成绩的差异。我们建议跑步者和教练关注步幅参数和下肢角度的特定方面,以部分优化骨盆运动并最终提高成绩。