Systems Neuroscience Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia.
Centre for Integrative Brain Function, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 7;7:43174. doi: 10.1038/srep43174.
Physical activity is disrupted in many psychiatric disorders. Advances in everyday technologies - such as accelerometers in smart phones - opens exciting possibilities for non-intrusive acquisition of activity data. Successful exploitation of this opportunity requires the validation of analytical methods that can capture the full movement spectrum. The study aim was to demonstrate an analytical approach to characterise accelerometer-derived activity patterns. Here, we use statistical methods to characterize accelerometer-derived activity patterns from a heterogeneous sample of 99 community-based adults with mental illnesses. Diagnoses were screened using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, and participants wore accelerometers for one week. We studied the relative ability of simple (exponential), complex (heavy-tailed), and composite models to explain patterns of activity and inactivity. Activity during wakefulness was a composite of brief random (exponential) movements and complex (heavy-tailed) processes, whereas movement during sleep lacked the heavy-tailed component. In contrast, inactivity followed a heavy-tailed process, lacking the random component. Activity patterns differed in nature between those with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and a primary psychotic disorder. These results show the potential of complex models to quantify the rich nature of human movement captured by accelerometry during wake and sleep, and the interaction with diagnosis and health.
许多精神疾病都会导致身体活动减少。日常技术的进步——例如智能手机中的加速度计——为非侵入式获取活动数据开辟了令人兴奋的可能性。要成功利用这一机会,就需要验证能够捕捉到完整运动频谱的分析方法。本研究旨在展示一种分析方法,用于描述加速度计得出的活动模式。在这里,我们使用统计方法来描述来自 99 名患有精神疾病的社区成年人的异质样本的加速度计得出的活动模式。使用 Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 进行诊断筛查,参与者佩戴加速度计一周。我们研究了简单(指数)、复杂(重尾)和组合模型解释活动和不活动模式的相对能力。清醒状态下的活动是短暂随机(指数)运动和复杂(重尾)过程的组合,而睡眠期间的运动缺乏重尾成分。相比之下,不活动遵循重尾过程,缺乏随机成分。诊断为双相情感障碍和原发性精神病障碍的个体的活动模式在性质上存在差异。这些结果表明,复杂模型具有量化加速度计在清醒和睡眠期间捕捉到的人类运动丰富特性的潜力,以及与诊断和健康的相互作用。