• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过pH缓冲来减轻局部麻醉给药时的疼痛。

Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering.

作者信息

Christoph R A, Buchanan L, Begalla K, Schwartz S

机构信息

University of Virginia Medical Center, Emergency Medical Services, Charlottesville 22908.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2
PMID:2827545
Abstract

The effects of pH buffering on the pain of administration and efficacy of three local anesthetics (1% lidocaine, 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and 1% mepivacaine) were investigated in a randomized, prospective, double-blind study of 25 adult volunteers. Plain and buffered solutions of the three local anesthetics were prepared, and a 0.5 intradermal injection of each was administered. Pain of anesthetic infiltration was rated from zero to ten. The area of anesthetized skin surrounding each injection site was measured at time intervals following each injection. Buffering the local anesthetics significantly reduced the mean quantitative pain estimates compared to the nonbuffered controls: 1) 1% lidocaine compared with buffered 1% lidocaine, 4.9 +/- 0.4 versus 1.1 +/- 0.2 (P less than 10(-6)); 2) 1% lidocaine with epinephrine compared with buffered 1% lidocaine with epinephrine, 5.1 +/- 0.4 versus 1.8 +/- 0.4 (P less than 10(-6)); and 3) 1% mepivacaine compared with buffered 1% mepivacaine, 5.1 +/- 0.4 versus 0.9 +/- 0.2 (P less than 10(-6)). Onset, extent, and duration of skin anesthesia were not statistically altered by pH buffering. The pain of local anesthetic administration can be dramatically reduced by buffering the local anesthetic prior to its infiltration. Anesthetic efficacy is not compromised, and patient acceptance may be significantly increased.

摘要

在一项针对25名成年志愿者的随机、前瞻性、双盲研究中,研究了pH缓冲对三种局部麻醉剂(1%利多卡因、含1:100,000肾上腺素的1%利多卡因和1%甲哌卡因)给药疼痛及疗效的影响。制备了三种局部麻醉剂的普通溶液和缓冲溶液,并分别进行0.5ml皮内注射。将麻醉剂浸润的疼痛程度从零到十分进行评分。在每次注射后的不同时间间隔测量每个注射部位周围麻醉皮肤的面积。与未缓冲的对照组相比,缓冲局部麻醉剂显著降低了平均定量疼痛估计值:1)1%利多卡因与缓冲后的1%利多卡因相比,分别为4.9±0.4和1.1±0.2(P<10⁻⁶);2)含肾上腺素的1%利多卡因与缓冲后的含肾上腺素的1%利多卡因相比,分别为5.1±0.4和1.8±0.4(P<10⁻⁶);3)1%甲哌卡因与缓冲后的1%甲哌卡因相比,分别为5.1±0.4和0.9±0.2(P<10⁻⁶)。pH缓冲对皮肤麻醉的起效、范围和持续时间无统计学改变。在局部麻醉剂浸润前进行缓冲可显著减轻局部麻醉剂给药时的疼痛。麻醉效果不受影响,患者接受度可能会显著提高。

相似文献

1
Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering.通过pH缓冲来减轻局部麻醉给药时的疼痛。
Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2.
2
Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine.减轻局部麻醉的疼痛:含肾上腺素的预混1%利多卡因缓冲液与新鲜混合肾上腺素的1%利多卡因的前瞻性双盲比较。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jan;54(1):128-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.06.043.
3
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the injection pain and anesthetic onset of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 5% and 10% sodium bicarbonate in maxillary infiltrations.一项前瞻性、随机、双盲比较研究,旨在比较上颌窦内注射 2%利多卡因与 1:100000 肾上腺素(用 5%和 10%碳酸氢钠缓冲)时的注射疼痛和麻醉起效时间。
J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):597-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
4
Does the combination of 3% mepivacaine plain plus 2% lidocaine with epinephrine improve anesthesia and reduce the pain of anesthetic injection for the inferior alveolar nerve block? A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.3% 单纯甲哌卡因联合 2% 利多卡因加肾上腺素能否改善下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉效果并减轻注射痛?一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
5
Neutralized lidocaine with epinephrine for local anesthesia--II.含肾上腺素的中和利多卡因用于局部麻醉——II。
J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1990 Sep;16(9):842-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1990.tb01570.x.
6
Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia.双眼、双侧疼痛比较,同时注射 2%利多卡因与缓冲 2%利多卡因用于眶周麻醉。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.029. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
7
Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering.通过pH缓冲减轻局部麻醉给药时的疼痛。
J Indiana Dent Assoc. 1991 Mar-Apr;70(2):24-5.
8
Prospective comparison between buffered 1% lidocaine-epinephrine and skin cooling in reducing the pain of local anesthetic infiltration.缓冲 1%利多卡因-肾上腺素与皮肤冷却在减轻局部麻醉浸润疼痛方面的前瞻性比较。
Dermatol Surg. 2012 Oct;38(10):1654-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02522.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
9
Effect of sodium bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block for teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized double-blind study.碳酸氢钠缓冲利多卡因对有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎患牙下牙槽神经阻滞成功率的影响:一项前瞻性、随机双盲研究。
J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):33-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
10
Neutralized lidocaine: use in pain reduction in local anesthesia.中和利多卡因:用于局部麻醉中的疼痛减轻。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1992 Feb;3(1):107-9. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(92)72200-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Anticipation, perception, and recollection of acute pain from local anesthesia injection prior to Mohs surgery.莫氏手术前局部麻醉注射所致急性疼痛的预期、感知与回忆
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Feb 25;317(1):490. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-03897-6.
2
Comparing the Efficacy of 8.4% and 7.5% Buffered Lidocaine during Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar- A Split Mouth Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.比较8.4%和7.5% 缓冲利多卡因在拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中的疗效——一项双侧对照双盲随机对照研究
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Sep 1;25(3):262-267. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.98891.2115. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Buffered versus Non-buffered Local Anaesthesia in Minor Oral Surgery - A Comparative Study.
小型口腔外科手术中缓冲与非缓冲局部麻醉的比较研究
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):15-20. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_168_21. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Lidocam Topical Gel (4% Lidocaine-0.3% Meloxicam) for Pain and Inflammation Management during Castration and Tail Docking in Piglets.利多卡因局部凝胶(4%利多卡因-0.3%美洛昔康)用于仔猪去势和断尾时疼痛与炎症管理的疗效及安全性
Animals (Basel). 2024 Mar 17;14(6):930. doi: 10.3390/ani14060930.
5
Evaluation of the efficacy of buffered local anesthetic in extraction of infected teeth-randomized double-blind study.评价缓冲局麻药在感染牙拔除术中的疗效:随机双盲研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;28(2):803-807. doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01206-5. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
6
How long to wait after local infiltration anaesthesia: systematic review.局部浸润麻醉后等待多长时间:系统评价。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad089.
7
Anesthetic efficacy of buffered 4% articaine for mandibular first molar infiltration: a crossover clinical trial.缓冲4%阿替卡因在下颌第一磨牙浸润麻醉中的效果:一项交叉临床试验。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jun;23(3):135-141. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.3.135. Epub 2023 May 26.
8
The potential value of exosomes as adjuvants for novel biologic local anesthetics.外泌体作为新型生物局部麻醉剂佐剂的潜在价值。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1112743. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1112743. eCollection 2023.
9
A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Anesthetic Efficacy of Buffered Versus Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine During Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block.一项比较研究,旨在评估在下牙槽神经阻滞中使用缓冲与未缓冲的2%利多卡因的麻醉效果。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 24;14(11):e31855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31855. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study.用于上颌乳磨牙拔除的含缓冲剂阿替卡因浸润麻醉:一项随机对照研究
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Oct;22(5):387-394. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387. Epub 2022 Sep 27.