Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Epidemics. 2017 Mar;18:16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2017.02.006.
Mathematical models of parasite transmission provide powerful tools for assessing the impacts of interventions. Owing to complexity and uncertainty, no single model may capture all features of transmission and elimination dynamics. Multi-model ensemble modelling offers a framework to help overcome biases of single models. We report on the development of a first multi-model ensemble of three lymphatic filariasis (LF) models (EPIFIL, LYMFASIM, and TRANSFIL), and evaluate its predictive performance in comparison with that of the constituents using calibration and validation data from three case study sites, one each from the three major LF endemic regions: Africa, Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea (PNG). We assessed the performance of the respective models for predicting the outcomes of annual MDA strategies for various baseline scenarios thought to exemplify the current endemic conditions in the three regions. The results show that the constructed multi-model ensemble outperformed the single models when evaluated across all sites. Single models that best fitted calibration data tended to do less well in simulating the out-of-sample, or validation, intervention data. Scenario modelling results demonstrate that the multi-model ensemble is able to compensate for variance between single models in order to produce more plausible predictions of intervention impacts. Our results highlight the value of an ensemble approach to modelling parasite control dynamics. However, its optimal use will require further methodological improvements as well as consideration of the organizational mechanisms required to ensure that modelling results and data are shared effectively between all stakeholders.
寄生虫传播的数学模型为评估干预措施的影响提供了强大的工具。由于复杂性和不确定性,没有单一的模型可以捕捉到传播和消除动态的所有特征。多模型集成建模提供了一个帮助克服单一模型偏差的框架。我们报告了第一个三种丝虫病(LF)模型(EPIFIL、LYMFASIM 和 TRANSFIL)的多模型集成的开发,并使用来自三个案例研究地点(每个地点分别来自 LF 三个主要流行地区:非洲、东南亚和巴布亚新几内亚(PNG))的校准和验证数据,比较其与组成部分的预测性能。我们评估了各自模型在预测各种基线情况下(被认为代表了三个地区当前流行状况)年度 MDA 策略结果的表现。结果表明,在所有地点进行评估时,构建的多模型集成的表现优于单个模型。最适合校准数据的单个模型在模拟样本外或验证干预数据方面往往表现不佳。情景建模结果表明,多模型集成能够补偿单个模型之间的差异,从而对干预影响产生更合理的预测。我们的结果强调了对寄生虫控制动态进行集成建模方法的价值。然而,要有效地在所有利益相关者之间共享建模结果和数据,还需要进一步改进方法,并考虑所需的组织机制。