Suppr超能文献

肥胖人群家庭血压测量的准确性存疑——根据欧洲高血压学会国际协议对Microlife WatchBP O3和欧姆龙RS6设备的验证

Questionable accuracy of home blood pressure measurements in the obese population - Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 and Omron RS6 devices according to the European Society of Hypertension-International Protocol.

作者信息

Azaki Alaa, Diab Reem, Harb Aya, Asmar Roland, Chahine Mirna N

机构信息

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath.

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath; Foundation-Medical Research Institutes (F-MRI®), Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Feb 27;13:61-69. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S126285. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Two oscillometric devices, the Microlife WatchBP O3 and the Omron RS6, designed for self-blood pressure measurement were evaluated according to the European Society of Hypertension (ESH)-International Protocol (IP) Revision 2010 in the obese population.

METHODS

The Microlife WatchBP O3 measures blood pressure (BP) at the brachial level and the Omron RS6 measures BP at the wrist level. The ESH-IP revision 2010 includes a total of 33 subjects. The difference between observers' and device BP values was calculated for each measure. A total of 99 pairs of BP differences were classified into three categories (≤5, ≤10, and ≤15 mmHg). The protocol procedures were followed precisely in each of the two studies.

RESULTS

Microlife WatchBP O3 and Omron RS6 failed to fulfill the criteria of the ESH-IP. The mean differences between the device and the mercury readings were: 0.3±7.8 mmHg and -1.9±6.4 mmHg for systolic BP and diastolic BP, respectively, for Microlife WatchBP O3, and 2.7±9.9 mmHg for SBP and 3.5±11.1 mmHg for diastolic BP for Omron RS6.

CONCLUSION

Microlife WatchBP O3 and Omron RS6 readings differing from the mercury standard by more than 5, 10, and 15 mmHg failed to fulfill the ESH-IP revision 2010 requirements in obese subjects. Therefore, the two devices cannot be recommended for use in obese subjects.

摘要

目的

根据欧洲高血压学会(ESH)-国际协议(IP)2010年修订版,对两款用于自测血压的示波测量设备——迈克大夫WatchBP O3和欧姆龙RS6在肥胖人群中进行评估。

方法

迈克大夫WatchBP O3在肱动脉水平测量血压(BP),欧姆龙RS6在腕部水平测量血压。ESH-IP 2010年修订版共纳入33名受试者。计算每次测量中观察者测量值与设备测量的BP值之间的差异。总共99对BP差值被分为三类(≤5、≤10和≤15 mmHg)。两项研究均严格遵循该协议程序。

结果

迈克大夫WatchBP O3和欧姆龙RS6未达到ESH-IP的标准。对于迈克大夫WatchBP O3,设备测量值与汞柱测量值之间的收缩压和舒张压平均差值分别为0.3±7.8 mmHg和-1.9±6.4 mmHg;对于欧姆龙RS6,收缩压平均差值为2.7±9.9 mmHg,舒张压平均差值为3.5±11.1 mmHg。

结论

迈克大夫WatchBP O3和欧姆龙RS6的测量值与汞柱标准的差值超过5、10和15 mmHg,未达到ESH-IP 2010年修订版对肥胖受试者的要求。因此,这两款设备不推荐用于肥胖受试者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa6/5338962/43871b2e6c53/vhrm-13-061Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验