Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro
Oncology Department, UO Oncologia, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio, BG, Italy.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Feb;8(1):39-48. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.11.03.
We performed a literature-based analysis of randomized clinical trials to assess the pathologic complete response (pCR) (ypT0N0 after neoadjuvant therapy) and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) as potential surrogate endpoints for 5-year overall survival (OS) in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (CT)RT.
A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Treatment effects on 3-year DFS and 5-year OS were expressed as rates of patients alive (%), and those on pCR as differences in pCR rates (∆). A weighted regression analysis was performed at individual- and trial-level to test the association between treatment effects on surrogate (∆ and ∆) and the main clinical outcome (∆).
Twenty-two trials involving 10,050 patients, were included in the analysis. The individual level surrogacy showed that the pCR% and 3-year DFS were poorly correlated with 5-year OS (R=0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.91; P=0.002; and R=0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-1; P=0.002). The trial-level surrogacy analysis confirmed that the two treatment effects on surrogates (∆ and ∆) are not strong surrogates for treatment effects on 5-year OS % (R=0.2; 95% CI, -0.29-0.78; P=0.5 and R=0.64; 95% CI, 0.29-1; P=0.06). These findings were confirmed in neoadjuvant CTRT studies but not in phase III trials were 3-year DFS could still represent a valid surrogate.
This analysis does not support the use of pCR and 3-year DFS% as appropriate surrogate endpoints for 5-year OS% in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy.
我们对随机临床试验进行了基于文献的分析,以评估病理完全缓解(pCR)(新辅助治疗后ypT0N0)和3年无病生存率(DFS)作为新辅助(化疗)放疗(CT)RT治疗直肠癌5年总生存率(OS)的潜在替代终点。
对PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、SCOPUS、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。对3年DFS和5年OS的治疗效果以存活患者的比例(%)表示,对pCR的治疗效果以pCR率的差异(∆)表示。在个体和试验水平上进行加权回归分析,以检验替代指标(∆和∆)的治疗效果与主要临床结局(∆)之间的关联。
分析纳入了22项试验,涉及10,050名患者。个体水平的替代分析表明,pCR%和3年DFS与5年OS的相关性较差(R = 0.52;95% CI,0.31 - 0.91;P = 0.002;R = 0.60;95% CI,0.36 - 1;P = 0.002)。试验水平的替代分析证实,对替代指标的两种治疗效果(∆和∆)并非5年OS%治疗效果的强替代指标(R = 0.2;95% CI,-0.29 - 0.78;P = 0.5;R = 0.64;95% CI,0.29 - 1;P = 0.06)。这些发现在内新辅助CTRT研究中得到了证实,但在III期试验中未得到证实,在III期试验中3年DFS仍可能是一个有效的替代指标。
本分析不支持将pCR和3年DFS%作为新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者5年OS%的合适替代终点。