Suppr超能文献

病理完全缓解和无病生存期并非直肠癌5年生存率的替代终点:一项对22项随机试验的分析

Pathologic complete response and disease-free survival are not surrogate endpoints for 5-year survival in rectal cancer: an analysis of 22 randomized trials.

作者信息

Petrelli Fausto, Borgonovo Karen, Cabiddu Mary, Ghilardi Mara, Lonati Veronica, Barni Sandro

机构信息

Oncology Department, UO Oncologia, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio, BG, Italy.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Feb;8(1):39-48. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.11.03.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We performed a literature-based analysis of randomized clinical trials to assess the pathologic complete response (pCR) (ypT0N0 after neoadjuvant therapy) and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) as potential surrogate endpoints for 5-year overall survival (OS) in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (CT)RT.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Treatment effects on 3-year DFS and 5-year OS were expressed as rates of patients alive (%), and those on pCR as differences in pCR rates (∆). A weighted regression analysis was performed at individual- and trial-level to test the association between treatment effects on surrogate (∆ and ∆) and the main clinical outcome (∆).

RESULTS

Twenty-two trials involving 10,050 patients, were included in the analysis. The individual level surrogacy showed that the pCR% and 3-year DFS were poorly correlated with 5-year OS (R=0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.91; P=0.002; and R=0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-1; P=0.002). The trial-level surrogacy analysis confirmed that the two treatment effects on surrogates (∆ and ∆) are not strong surrogates for treatment effects on 5-year OS % (R=0.2; 95% CI, -0.29-0.78; P=0.5 and R=0.64; 95% CI, 0.29-1; P=0.06). These findings were confirmed in neoadjuvant CTRT studies but not in phase III trials were 3-year DFS could still represent a valid surrogate.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis does not support the use of pCR and 3-year DFS% as appropriate surrogate endpoints for 5-year OS% in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

摘要

背景

我们对随机临床试验进行了基于文献的分析,以评估病理完全缓解(pCR)(新辅助治疗后ypT0N0)和3年无病生存率(DFS)作为新辅助(化疗)放疗(CT)RT治疗直肠癌5年总生存率(OS)的潜在替代终点。

方法

对PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、SCOPUS、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。对3年DFS和5年OS的治疗效果以存活患者的比例(%)表示,对pCR的治疗效果以pCR率的差异(∆)表示。在个体和试验水平上进行加权回归分析,以检验替代指标(∆和∆)的治疗效果与主要临床结局(∆)之间的关联。

结果

分析纳入了22项试验,涉及10,050名患者。个体水平的替代分析表明,pCR%和3年DFS与5年OS的相关性较差(R = 0.52;95% CI,0.31 - 0.91;P = 0.002;R = 0.60;95% CI,0.36 - 1;P = 0.002)。试验水平的替代分析证实,对替代指标的两种治疗效果(∆和∆)并非5年OS%治疗效果的强替代指标(R = 0.2;95% CI,-0.29 - 0.78;P = 0.5;R = 0.64;95% CI,0.29 - 1;P = 0.06)。这些发现在内新辅助CTRT研究中得到了证实,但在III期试验中未得到证实,在III期试验中3年DFS仍可能是一个有效的替代指标。

结论

本分析不支持将pCR和3年DFS%作为新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者5年OS%的合适替代终点。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验