Down Ian, Ellard Jeanne, Bavinton Benjamin R, Brown Graham, Prestage Garrett
The Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Australian Research Centre in Sex Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
AIDS Behav. 2017 Aug;21(8):2543-2550. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1747-0.
It has been estimated that the majority of global HIV infections among gay and bisexual men (GBM) can be attributed to sex within a committed relationship. In Australia, however, negotiated safety, whereby HIV-negative regular partners agree to discard condoms with each other but commit to consistent condom use with other partners, has been promoted as a key component of the HIV prevention response. We asked GBM recently diagnosed with HIV to describe their relationship to the person they believed to be the source of their infection ('source person'). The majority (66.1%) ascribed their infection to a casual partner. A further 23.3% ascribed their infection to a non-committed and non-romantic partner (or 'fuckbuddy'). Only 10.6% believed they had acquired their HIV from a 'boyfriend' in the context of a committed romantic relationship, and 51.7% of these occurred within the first 3 months following their first sexual contact. Most men (61.5%) believed they had acquired their HIV infection on the first occasion they had sex with the source person. In the Australian context, negotiated safety appears to have minimised infections between regular partners. However, many HIV infections between regular partners may not be in the context of a romantic committed relationship, and yet this distinction between types of regular partners has been all but ignored. Furthermore, in this sample, most infections occurred on the occasion of first meeting, suggesting that the most useful indicators of risk may be the characteristics, contexts, and lengths of sexual partnerships and how sex is negotiated, rather than how GBM categorize their partner. Findings suggest more new HIV infections occur in new partnerships, than in established relationships.
据估计,全球男同性恋者和双性恋男性(GBM)中大多数艾滋病毒感染可归因于在稳定关系内的性行为。然而,在澳大利亚,协商安全性行为被推广为艾滋病毒预防应对措施的关键组成部分,即艾滋病毒阴性的固定伴侣同意相互不使用避孕套,但承诺与其他伴侣始终使用避孕套。我们询问了最近被诊断出感染艾滋病毒的GBM,让他们描述与他们认为是其感染源的人(“源头人物”)的关系。大多数人(66.1%)将感染归因于偶然伴侣。另有23.3%将感染归因于非固定且非浪漫的伴侣(或“炮友”)。只有10.6%的人认为他们是在稳定浪漫关系的背景下从“男朋友”那里感染了艾滋病毒,其中51.7%发生在他们首次性接触后的前3个月内。大多数男性(61.5%)认为他们是在与源头人物首次发生性行为时感染了艾滋病毒。在澳大利亚的背景下,协商安全性行为似乎将固定伴侣之间的感染风险降至最低。然而,许多固定伴侣之间的艾滋病毒感染可能并非处于浪漫的稳定关系中,然而这种固定伴侣类型之间的区别几乎被忽视了。此外,在这个样本中,大多数感染发生在初次见面时,这表明最有用的风险指标可能是性伴侣关系的特征、背景和时长以及性行为的协商方式,而不是GBM如何对其伴侣进行分类。研究结果表明,新的艾滋病毒感染在新的伴侣关系中比在已建立的关系中更为常见。