Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Children's Nursing, London South Bank University, United Kingdom; Nursing Research Department, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Aust Crit Care. 2018 Jan;31(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Pain and sedation protocols are suggested to improve the outcomes of patients within paediatric intensive care. However, it is not clear how protocols will influence practice within individual units.
Evaluate a nurse led pain and sedation protocols impact on pain scoring and analgesic and sedative administration for post-operative cardiac patients within a paediatric intensive care unit.
A retrospective chart review was performed on 100 patients admitted to a tertiary paediatric intensive care unit pre and post introduction of an analgesic and sedative protocol. Stata12 was used to perform Chi-squared or Student's t-test to compare data between the groups.
Post protocol introduction documentation of pain assessments increased (pre protocol 3/24h vs post protocol 5/24h, p=0.006). Along with a reduction in administration of midazolam (57.6mcg/kg/min pre protocol vs 24.5mcg/kg/min post protocol, p=0.0001). Children's pain scores remained unchanged despite this change, with a trend towards more scores in the optimal range in the post protocol group (5 pre protocol vs 12 post protocol, p=0.06).
Introducing a pain and sedation protocol changed bedside nurse practice in pain and sedation management. The protocol has enabled nurses to provide pain and sedation management in a consistent and timely manner and reduced the dose of midazolam required to maintain comfort according to the patients COMFORT B scores. Individual evaluation of practice change is recommended to units who implement nurse led analgesic and sedative protocols to monitor changes in practice.
疼痛和镇静方案被建议用于改善儿科重症监护病房患者的预后。然而,目前尚不清楚这些方案将如何影响各个单位的实践。
评估护士主导的疼痛和镇静方案对儿科重症监护病房术后心脏患者疼痛评分以及镇痛和镇静药物管理的影响。
对 100 名入住三级儿科重症监护病房的患者进行回顾性图表审查,比较引入镇痛和镇静方案前后的疼痛评估和镇痛、镇静药物使用情况。使用 Stata12 进行卡方检验或学生 t 检验比较两组数据。
方案引入后疼痛评估记录增加(方案前 3/24 小时与方案后 5/24 小时,p=0.006)。咪达唑仑的使用量也减少(方案前 57.6mcg/kg/min 与方案后 24.5mcg/kg/min,p=0.0001)。尽管如此,儿童的疼痛评分并没有改变,方案后组的评分更倾向于处于最佳范围(方案前 5 分与方案后 12 分,p=0.06)。
引入疼痛和镇静方案改变了床边护士在疼痛和镇静管理方面的实践。该方案使护士能够以一致和及时的方式提供疼痛和镇静管理,并根据患者 COMFORT B 评分减少咪达唑仑的剂量以维持舒适。建议实施护士主导的镇痛和镇静方案的单位对实践变化进行个体评估,以监测实践的变化。