Blome Christine, Sondermann Hanno, Augustin Matthias
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (CVderm), Hamburg, Germany.
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Feb 15;34(1):Doc11. doi: 10.3205/zma001088. eCollection 2017.
This systematic review aimed to extract recommendations from expert opinion articles on how to give a medical research presentation on a scientific conference and to determine whether the experts agree on what makes an effective or poor presentation. Presentation-related terms were searched within article titles listed in PubMed, restricting the search to English-language articles published from January 1975 to July 2015. Recommendations were extracted from the articles, grouped by content, and analyzed for frequency. Ninety-one articles were included. Among 679 different recommendations, 29 were given in more than 20% of articles each. The five most frequent recommendations were to keep slides simple, adjust the talk to the audience, rehearse, not read the talk from slides or a manuscript, and make eye contact. No article gave advice that was the complete opposite of the 29 most frequent recommendations with the exception of whether a light or dark background should be used for slides. Researchers should comply with these widely accepted standards to be perceived as effective presenters.
本系统评价旨在从专家意见文章中提取关于如何在科学会议上进行医学研究报告的建议,并确定专家们对于有效或不佳报告的构成要素是否达成共识。在PubMed列出的文章标题中搜索与报告相关的术语,搜索范围限定为1975年1月至2015年7月发表的英文文章。从文章中提取建议,按内容分组,并分析其出现频率。共纳入91篇文章。在679条不同的建议中,有29条在超过20%的文章中出现。出现频率最高的五条建议是保持幻灯片简洁、根据听众调整报告内容、排练、不要照着幻灯片或手稿念报告以及进行眼神交流。除了幻灯片应使用浅色还是深色背景这一问题外,没有文章给出与29条出现频率最高的建议完全相反的建议。研究人员应遵循这些广泛认可的标准,以便被视为有效的报告者。