Dietrich Franciele, Hammerman Malin, Blomgran Parmis, Tätting Love, Bampi Vinicius Faccin, Silva Jefferson Braga, Aspenberg Per
a Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Orthopedics , Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden.
b CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil , Brasília.
Acta Orthop. 2017 Aug;88(4):416-421. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1293447. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
Background and purpose - In 3 papers in Acta Orthopaedica 10 years ago, we described that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) improves tendon healing in a rat Achilles transection model. Later, we found that microtrauma has similar effects, probably acting via inflammation. This raised the suspicion that the effect ascribed to growth factors within PRP could instead be due to unspecific influences on inflammation. While testing this hypothesis, we noted that the effect seemed to be related to the microbiota. Material and methods - We tried to reproduce our old findings with local injection of PRP 6 h after tendon transection, followed by mechanical testing after 11 days. This failed. After fruitless variations in PRP production protocols, leukocyte concentration, and physical activity, we finally tried rats carrying potentially pathogenic bacteria. In all, 242 rats were used. Results - In 4 consecutive experiments on pathogen-free rats, no effect of PRP on healing was found. In contrast, apparently healthy rats carrying Staphylococcus aureus showed increased strength of the healing tendon after PRP treatment. These rats had lower [corrected] levels of cytotoxic T-cells in their spleens. Interpretation - The failure to reproduce older experiments in clean rats was striking, and the difference in response between these and Staphylococcus-carrying rats suggests that the PRP effect is dependent on the immune status. PRP functions may be more complex than just the release of growth factors. Extrapolation from our previous findings with PRP to the situation in humans therefore becomes even more uncertain.
背景与目的——10年前,我们在《骨与关节外科杂志》上发表的3篇论文中描述了富血小板血浆(PRP)可改善大鼠跟腱横断模型中的肌腱愈合情况。后来,我们发现微创伤也有类似作用,可能是通过炎症起作用。这引发了一种怀疑,即归因于PRP中生长因子的作用可能反而源于对炎症的非特异性影响。在验证这一假设的过程中,我们注意到这种作用似乎与微生物群有关。
材料与方法——我们试图重现之前的研究结果,即在肌腱横断后6小时局部注射PRP,11天后进行力学测试。但未成功。在对PRP制备方案、白细胞浓度和体力活动进行了无果的调整后,我们最终尝试使用携带潜在病原菌的大鼠。总共使用了242只大鼠。
结果——在对无菌大鼠进行的4项连续实验中,未发现PRP对愈合有影响。相比之下,携带金黄色葡萄球菌的看似健康的大鼠在接受PRP治疗后,愈合肌腱的强度增加。这些大鼠脾脏中的细胞毒性T细胞水平较低[校正后]。
解读——在清洁大鼠中未能重现早期实验结果令人惊讶,这些大鼠与携带葡萄球菌的大鼠之间的反应差异表明,PRP的作用取决于免疫状态。PRP的功能可能比单纯释放生长因子更为复杂。因此,将我们之前关于PRP的研究结果外推至人类情况变得更加不确定。