• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血型的delta检查:血液安全方面的一大进步。

Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety.

作者信息

Makroo Raj Nath, Bhatia Aakanksha

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Molecular Biology and Transplant Immunology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Asian J Transfus Sci. 2017 Jan-Jun;11(1):18-21. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.200783.

DOI:10.4103/0973-6247.200783
PMID:28316435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5345275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood grouping is the single most important test performed by each and every transfusion service. A blood group error has a potential for causing severe life-threatening complications. A number of process strategies have been adopted at various institutions to prevent the occurrence of errors at the time of phlebotomy, pretransfusion testing, and blood administration. A delta check is one such quality control tool that involves the comparison of laboratory test results with results obtained on previous samples from the same patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrieved the records of all transfusion-related incidents reported in our institute, between January 2008 and December 2014. Errors identified as "Failed Delta checks" and their root cause analyses (RCA) were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 17,034 errors related to blood transfusion were reported. Of these, 38 were blood grouping errors. Seventeen blood group errors were identified due to failed delta checks, where the results of two individually drawn grouping samples yielded different blood group results. The RCA revealed that all of these errors occurred in the preanalytical phase of testing. Mislabeling resulting in wrong blood in tube was the most commonly identified cause, accounting for 11 of these errors, while problems with correct patient identification accounted for 5 failed delta checks.

CONCLUSION

Delta checks proved to be an effective tool for detecting blood group errors and prevention of accidental mismatched blood transfusions. Preanalytical errors in patient identification or sample labeling were the most frequent.

摘要

背景

血型鉴定是每个输血服务机构进行的最重要的单项检测。血型错误有可能引发严重的危及生命的并发症。各机构已采用多种流程策略来预防在静脉采血、输血前检测及输血过程中出现错误。差值核对就是这样一种质量控制工具,它涉及将实验室检测结果与同一患者先前样本的检测结果进行比较。

材料与方法

我们检索了2008年1月至2014年12月期间我院报告的所有输血相关事件的记录。对被认定为“差值核对失败”的错误及其根本原因分析(RCA)进行了审查。

结果

共报告了17034例与输血相关的错误。其中,38例为血型鉴定错误。因差值核对失败而确定的17例血型错误中,两次单独采集的血型样本结果显示不同的血型。根本原因分析表明,所有这些错误均发生在检测的分析前阶段。导致试管内血液错误的贴错标签是最常见的原因,在这些错误中占11例,而正确识别患者方面的问题导致5例差值核对失败。

结论

差值核对被证明是检测血型错误和预防意外血型不匹配输血的有效工具。患者识别或样本标签方面的分析前错误最为常见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b35/5345275/4b4c684e6d09/AJTS-11-18-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b35/5345275/a3ba3520bcf2/AJTS-11-18-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b35/5345275/4b4c684e6d09/AJTS-11-18-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b35/5345275/a3ba3520bcf2/AJTS-11-18-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b35/5345275/4b4c684e6d09/AJTS-11-18-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety.血型的delta检查:血液安全方面的一大进步。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2017 Jan-Jun;11(1):18-21. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.200783.
2
Development and Evaluation of a Logical Delta Check for Identifying Erroneous Blood Count Results in a Tertiary Care Hospital.用于识别三级医院错误血常规结果的逻辑差值检查的开发与评估
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Aug;139(8):1042-7. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0494-OA.
3
Delta checks.德尔塔检查。
Adv Clin Chem. 2023;115:175-203. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
4
Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.通过教育和技术干预减少分析前实验室样本误差。
Clin Lab. 2012;58(9-10):911-7.
5
Delta Check Practices and Outcomes: A Q-Probes Study Involving 49 Health Care Facilities and 6541 Delta Check Alerts.差值检查实践与结果:一项涉及49个医疗机构和6541次差值检查警报的Q-调查研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Jun;141(6):813-823. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0161-CP. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Addressing sample identification errors in a multispecialty tertiary care hospital in Bangalore.解决班加罗尔一家多专科三级护理医院中的样本识别错误问题。
Vox Sang. 2014 Aug;107(2):153-7. doi: 10.1111/vox.12139. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
7
Evidence-based approach to setting delta check rules.基于证据的德尔塔检查规则制定方法。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2021 Jan;58(1):49-59. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2020.1800585. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
8
Blood bank safety practices: mislabeled samples and wrong blood in tube--a Q-Probes analysis of 122 clinical laboratories.血库安全操作实践:标签错误的样本和管内错误的血液——122 个临床实验室的 Q-Probes 分析。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Aug;134(8):1108-15. doi: 10.5858/2009-0674-CP.1.
9
Improvement in transfusion safety using a specially designed transfusion wristband.使用专门设计的输血腕带提高输血安全性。
Transfus Med. 2000 Jun;10(2):121-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.2000.00241.x.
10
Report on errors in pretransfusion testing from a tertiary care center: A step toward transfusion safety.三级医疗中心输血前检测错误报告:迈向输血安全的一步。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016 Jan-Jun;10(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.175402.

本文引用的文献

1
Error reporting in transfusion medicine: an important tool to improve patient safety.输血医学中的差错报告:提高患者安全的重要工具。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Nov;50(11):1871-2. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0349.
2
Identification errors in the blood transfusion laboratory: a still relevant issue for patient safety.输血实验室中的识别错误:对患者安全而言仍是一个重要问题。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2011 Apr;44(2):231-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
3
Near miss errors in transfusion medicine: the experience of the G. Gaslini transfusion medicine service.
输血医学中的险些失误:G. 加斯利尼输血医学服务中心的经验
Blood Transfus. 2007 Nov;5(4):210-6. doi: 10.2450/2007.0010-07.
4
Changes in practice and organisation surrounding blood transfusion in NHS trusts in England 1995-2005.1995 - 2005年英格兰国民健康服务信托机构中输血相关实践与组织的变化
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Aug;17(4):239-43. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023895.
5
Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later.十年后统计实验室的误差:类型与频率
Clin Chem. 2007 Jul;53(7):1338-42. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344. Epub 2007 May 24.
6
Safe handling and administration of blood components: review of practical concepts.血液成分的安全处理与输注:实用概念综述
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007 May;131(5):690-4. doi: 10.5858/2007-131-690-SHAAOB.
7
Quality improvement to decrease specimen mislabeling in transfusion medicine.提高质量以减少输血医学中的标本误贴标签情况。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Aug;130(8):1196-8. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-1196-QITDSM.
8
Getting the right blood to the right patient: the contribution of near-miss event reporting and barrier analysis.将正确的血液输给正确的患者:险些发生的事件报告及障碍分析的作用
Transfus Clin Biol. 2005 Nov;12(5):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
9
Experience with the medical event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM) at three hospitals.三家医院的输血医学医疗事件报告系统(MERS-TM)的经验。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2004 Oct;31(2):133-43. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2004.07.007.
10
Emily Cooley Lecture 2002: transfusion safety in the hospital.2002年艾米丽·库利讲座:医院输血安全
Transfusion. 2003 Sep;43(9):1190-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00523.x.