Lehtola H, Airaksinen K E J, Hartikainen P, Hartikainen J E K, Palomäki A, Nuotio I, Ylitalo A, Kiviniemi T, Mustonen P
Department of Medicine, Keski-Suomi Central Hospital, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Heart Center, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Eur J Neurol. 2017 May;24(5):719-725. doi: 10.1111/ene.13280. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and significant carotid artery stenosis (CAS) often coexist in patients with acute stroke but whether CAS affects the stroke recurrence rate in anticoagulated AF patients is largely unknown. The effect of concomitant CAS on both short- and long-term prognosis after stroke in patients with AF was evaluated.
The multicentre, retrospective FibStroke registry included AF patients with an ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) during 2003-2012. In this sub-study, 165 AF patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA with significant (>50%) CAS (CAS group) and 734 AF patients without CAS (non-CAS group) were identified. The median follow-up time after an index event was 3.5 (interquartile range 3.9) years. Long-term stroke recurrence rate, 30-day mortality, CHA DS -VASc score, other risk factors and the use and intensity of anticoagulation were assessed.
The recurrence rate of ischaemic stroke (21.2% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.005, 8.1 vs. 3.6 events per100 follow-up years) was significantly higher in CAS patients compared to the non-CAS group despite similar anticoagulation/antithrombotic therapy. CAS patients had higher mean CHA DS -VASc scores than non-CAS patients (4.3 vs. 3.3, P < 0.001). However, in a multivariate analysis CAS was shown to be an independent risk factor for stroke recurrence (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.37-3.01, P = 0.001). The 30-day all-cause mortality was significantly higher in CAS patients (7.9% vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001) and CAS was an independent risk factor also for 30-day mortality (odds ratio 3.34, 95% confidence interval 1.51-7.38, P = 0.003).
In patients with AF, concomitant CAS was an independent risk factor for both long-term stroke recurrence and 30-day mortality.
心房颤动(AF)和严重颈动脉狭窄(CAS)在急性卒中患者中常同时存在,但CAS是否会影响接受抗凝治疗的AF患者的卒中复发率,目前尚不清楚。本研究评估了合并CAS对AF患者卒中后短期和长期预后的影响。
多中心回顾性FibStroke注册研究纳入了2003年至2012年期间发生缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的AF患者。在这项子研究中,共确定了165例患有缺血性卒中或TIA且伴有严重(>50%)CAS的AF患者(CAS组)和734例无CAS的AF患者(非CAS组)。指数事件后的中位随访时间为3.5(四分位间距3.9)年。评估了长期卒中复发率、30天死亡率、CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分、其他危险因素以及抗凝治疗的使用和强度。
尽管抗凝/抗栓治疗相似,但CAS患者的缺血性卒中复发率显著高于非CAS组(21.2%对12.7%,P = 0.005,每100随访年8.1次对3.6次事件)。CAS患者的平均CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分高于非CAS患者(4.3对3.3,P < 0.001)。然而,在多变量分析中,CAS被证明是卒中复发的独立危险因素(风险比2.02,95%置信区间1.37 - 3.01,P = 0.001)。CAS患者的30天全因死亡率显著更高(7.9%对1.9%,P < 0.001),并且CAS也是30天死亡率的独立危险因素(比值比3.34,95%置信区间1.51 - 7.38,P = 0.003)。
在AF患者中,合并CAS是长期卒中复发和30天死亡率的独立危险因素。