Pichonnaz Claude, Aminian Kamiar, Ancey Céline, Jaccard Hervé, Lécureux Estelle, Duc Cyntia, Farron Alain, Jolles Brigitte M, Gleeson Nigel
Physiotherapy Department, Haute Ecole de Santé Vaud (HESAV)//HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland., CHUV-UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0174365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174365. eCollection 2017.
The B-B Score is a straightforward kinematic shoulder function score including only two movements (hand to the Back + lift hand as to change a Bulb) that demonstrated sound measurement properties for patients for various shoulder pathologies. However, the B-B Score results using a smartphone or a reference system have not yet been compared. Provided that the measurement properties are comparable, the use of a smartphone would offer substantial practical advantages. This study investigated the concurrent validity of a smartphone and a reference inertial system for the measurement of the kinematic shoulder function B-B Score.
Sixty-five patients with shoulder conditions (with rotator cuff conditions, adhesive capsulitis and proximal humerus fracture) and 20 healthy participants were evaluated using a smartphone and a reference inertial system. Measurements were performed twice, alternating between two evaluators. The B-B Score differences between groups, differences between devices, relationship between devices, intra- and inter-evaluator reproducibility were analysed.
The smartphone mean scores (SD) were 94.1 (11.1) for controls and 54.1 (18.3) for patients (P < 0.01). The difference between devices was non-significant for the control (P = 0.16) and the patient group (P = 0.81). The analysis of the relationship between devices showed 0.97 ICC, -0.6 bias and -13.2 to 12.0 limits of agreement (LOA). The smartphone intra-evaluator ICC was 0.92, the bias 1.5 and the LOA -17.4 to 20.3. The smartphone inter-evaluator ICC was 0.92, the bias 1.5 and the LOA -16.9 to 20.0.
The B-B Score results measured with a smartphone were comparable to those of an inertial system. While single measurements diverged in some cases, the intra- and inter-evaluator reproducibility was excellent and was equivalent between devices. The B-B score measured with a smartphone is straightforward and as efficient as a reference inertial system measurement.
B - B评分是一种简单的肩部运动功能评分,仅包括两个动作(手向后伸 + 抬手如换灯泡),已证明对各种肩部病变患者具有良好的测量属性。然而,使用智能手机或参考系统得出的B - B评分结果尚未进行比较。如果测量属性具有可比性,使用智能手机将具有显著的实际优势。本研究调查了智能手机和参考惯性系统在测量肩部运动功能B - B评分方面的同时效度。
使用智能手机和参考惯性系统对65例肩部疾病患者(包括肩袖损伤、粘连性关节囊炎和肱骨近端骨折)和20名健康参与者进行评估。测量由两名评估者交替进行两次。分析了组间的B - B评分差异、设备间差异、设备间关系、评估者内和评估者间的重复性。
对照组智能手机平均评分为94.1(标准差11.1),患者组为54.1(标准差18.3)(P < 0.01)。对照组(P = 0.16)和患者组(P = 0.81)设备间差异不显著。设备间关系分析显示组内相关系数(ICC)为0.97,偏差为 - 0.6,一致性界限(LOA)为 - 13.2至12.0。智能手机评估者内ICC为0.92,偏差为1.5,LOA为 - 17.4至20.3。智能手机评估者间ICC为0.92,偏差为1.5,LOA为 - 16.9至20.0。
用智能手机测量的B - B评分结果与惯性系统相当。虽然单次测量在某些情况下存在差异,但评估者内和评估者间的重复性极佳,且设备间相当。用智能手机测量的B - B评分简单直接,与参考惯性系统测量一样有效。