Suppr超能文献

丹麦西部安大略肩不稳定指数(WOSI)电子版的翻译、改编及测量特性

Translation, adaptation and measurement properties of an electronic version of the Danish Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).

作者信息

Eshoj Henrik, Bak Klaus, Blønd Lars, Juul-Kristensen Birgit

机构信息

Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Quality of Life Research Center, Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):e014053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014053.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To translate and adapt the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) questionnaire into Danish and, to evaluate measurement properties of an electronic Danish WOSI version.

METHODS

The Swedish WOSI version was used for translation and adaptation into Danish followed by examination of test-retest reproducibility (14-day interval) besides concurrent and construct validity. Concurrent validity was examined by comparing WOSI in paper version with an electronic version, whereas construct validity was examined by comparing WOSI with Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Reproducibility was evaluated with Intraclass correlations (ICC), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and limits of agreement (LOA). Validity was evaluated with Pearson's ( and Concordance Correlation Coefficients (CCC).

RESULTS

41 subjects (median age 34, range 18-57) were included in the analysis of reproducibility. An ICC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99) for the total WOSI score was found. SEM was 100.1, resulting in an MDC of 277.5 and LOAs within the range of -246.4 and 308.6. 25 subjects (median age 34, range 18-72) were included in the analysis of concurrent validity obtaining a CCC of 0.96 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.98). Construct validity was investigated in 62 subjects (median age 31, range 18-72) obtaining correlations of 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.97) (NPRS) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.94) (OSS).

CONCLUSIONS

An electronic Danish version of WOSI presented excellent test-retest reproducibility and acceptable measurement errors. Also, concurrent validity between paper and electronic version was highly satisfactory as was the construct validity. Surprisingly, though, the NPRS correlated more with WOSI than OSS.

摘要

目的

将西安大略肩不稳定(WOSI)问卷翻译成丹麦语并进行改编,并评估丹麦语电子版本的测量属性。

方法

使用瑞典语版WOSI进行翻译并改编成丹麦语,随后除了同时效度和结构效度外,还检验了重测信度(间隔14天)。通过将纸质版WOSI与电子版进行比较来检验同时效度,而通过将WOSI与数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)和牛津肩部评分(OSS)进行比较来检验结构效度。用组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和一致性界限(LOA)评估信度。用Pearson相关系数和一致性相关系数(CCC)评估效度。

结果

41名受试者(中位年龄34岁,范围18 - 57岁)纳入重测信度分析。发现WOSI总分的ICC为0.97(95%CI 0.95至0.99)。SEM为100.1,MDC为277.5,LOA在 - 246.4至308.6范围内。25名受试者(中位年龄34岁,范围18 - 72岁)纳入同时效度分析得到CCC为0.96(95%CI 0.91至0.98)。在62名受试者(中位年龄31岁,范围18 - 72岁)中研究结构效度,与NPRS的相关性为0.83(95%CI 0.68至0.97),与OSS的相关性为0.79(95%CI 0.62至0.94)。

结论

丹麦语电子版本的WOSI表现出出色的重测信度和可接受的测量误差。此外,纸质版和电子版之间的同时效度以及结构效度都非常令人满意。然而,令人惊讶的是,NPRS与WOSI的相关性比OSS更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fa/5577900/0ba5d8119644/bmjopen-2016-014053f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验