ICFO-Institut de Ciences Fotonique, Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss, 3, 08860 Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain.
ITAV, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France.
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 21;7:44939. doi: 10.1038/srep44939.
Tissue mimics (TMs) on the scale of several hundred microns provide a beneficial cell culture configuration for in vitro engineered tissue and are currently under the spotlight in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Due to the cell density and size, TMs are fairly inaccessible to optical observation and imaging within these samples remains challenging. Light Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy (LSFM)- an emerging and attractive technique for 3D optical sectioning of large samples- appears to be a particularly well-suited approach to deal with them. In this work, we compared the effectiveness of different light sheet illumination modalities reported in the literature to improve resolution and/or light exposure for complex 3D samples. In order to provide an acute and fair comparative assessment, we also developed a systematic, computerized benchmarking method. The outcomes of our experiment provide meaningful information for valid comparisons and arises the main differences between the modalities when imaging different types of TMs.
在几百微米的规模上,组织模拟物(TMs)为体外工程组织提供了有益的细胞培养结构,目前是组织工程和再生医学的焦点。由于细胞密度和大小,TMs 相当难以进行光学观察,并且在这些样品内进行成像仍然具有挑战性。光片荧光显微镜(LSFM)-一种用于大型样品的 3D 光学切片的新兴且有吸引力的技术-似乎是一种特别适合处理它们的方法。在这项工作中,我们比较了文献中报道的不同光片照明模式的有效性,以提高复杂 3D 样品的分辨率和/或光暴露。为了提供急性和公平的比较评估,我们还开发了一种系统的、计算机化的基准测试方法。我们实验的结果为有效的比较提供了有意义的信息,并在对不同类型的 TMs 进行成像时,揭示了不同模式之间的主要差异。