• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经产妇使用宫内节育器与子宫穿孔风险:一项二次分析

IUD use among parous women and risk of uterine perforation: a secondary analysis.

作者信息

Heinemann Klaas, Barnett Clare, Reed Suzanne, Möhner Sabine, Do Minh Thai

机构信息

ZEG - Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Berlin, Germany.

ZEG - Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Contraception. 2017 Jun;95(6):605-607. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.03.007
PMID:28322770
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine if delivery and lactation are risk factors for complete intrauterine device perforations.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a reanalysis of the European Active Surveillance Study on Intra-Uterine Devices data set using complete penetration of the myometrium as the definition for perforation.

RESULTS

Of the 61,448 women enrolled (70% levonorgestrel, 30% copper devices), we identified 58 complete perforations, 30 of which occurred in lactating women. Incidence per 1000 insertions was 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-6.4) for lactating and 0.6 (95% CI: 0.4-0.9) for nonlactating women. Time since delivery was also associated with perforation risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Lactation and delivery are independent cofactors for perforation. Results do not differ when restricting the definition of perforation.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定分娩和哺乳是否为宫内节育器完全穿孔的危险因素。

研究设计

我们对欧洲宫内节育器主动监测研究数据集进行了重新分析,将子宫肌层完全穿透作为穿孔的定义。

结果

在纳入的61448名女性中(70%使用左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器,30%使用铜宫内节育器),我们识别出58例完全穿孔,其中30例发生在哺乳期女性中。哺乳期女性每1000次放置的发生率为4.5(95%置信区间[CI]:3.0 - 6.4),非哺乳期女性为0.6(95%CI:0.4 - 0.9)。分娩后的时间也与穿孔风险相关。

结论

哺乳和分娩是穿孔的独立协同因素。在限制穿孔定义时结果无差异。

相似文献

1
IUD use among parous women and risk of uterine perforation: a secondary analysis.经产妇使用宫内节育器与子宫穿孔风险:一项二次分析
Contraception. 2017 Jun;95(6):605-607. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Perforation risk and intra-uterine devices: results of the EURAS-IUD 5-year extension study.穿孔风险与宫内节育器:欧亚宫内节育器5年延长期研究结果
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017 Dec;22(6):424-428. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1412427. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
3
Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices.欧洲宫内节育器主动监测研究中左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器和铜宫内节育器导致子宫穿孔的风险
Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
4
Intrauterine contraception: incidence and factors associated with uterine perforation--a population-based study.宫内避孕器:与子宫穿孔相关的发生率和因素——基于人群的研究。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Sep;27(9):2658-63. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des246. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
5
Design of the Association of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study: a multisite retrospective cohort study.《子宫穿孔与宫内节育器排出相关因素研究》设计:多中心回顾性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):599.e1-599.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Association between intrauterine device type and risk of perforation and device expulsion: results from the Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study.宫内节育器类型与穿孔和器械脱落风险的关系:穿孔和宫内节育器脱落研究协会的研究结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):57.e1-57.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.062. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
Risks of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion Associated With Intrauterine Devices.宫内节育器相关的子宫穿孔和排出风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep 1;142(3):641-651. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005299. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
8
Association between menorrhagia and risk of intrauterine device-related uterine perforation and device expulsion: results from the Association of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study.月经过多与宫内节育器相关子宫穿孔和节育器脱落风险的关系:来自宫内节育器穿孔和脱落研究协会的结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):59.e1-59.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.025. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
9
Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.宫内节育器:口服激素避孕的有效替代方法。
Prescrire Int. 2009 Jun;18(101):125-30.
10
Uterine perforation with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: analysis of reports from four national pharmacovigilance centres.含左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统的子宫穿孔:来自四个国家药物警戒中心的报告分析。
Drug Saf. 2011 Jan 1;34(1):83-8. doi: 10.2165/11585050-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors of uterine perforation when using contraceptive intrauterine devices.使用宫内节育器时子宫穿孔的风险因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03298-3.
2
Clinical outcomes of intrauterine device insertions by newly trained providers: The ECHO trial experience.新培训提供者进行宫内节育器插入术的临床结局:ECHO试验经验。
Contracept X. 2023 Mar 30;5:100092. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100092. eCollection 2023.
3
Obstetric Outcomes after Perforation of Uterine Cavity.子宫腔穿孔后的产科结局
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 30;11(15):4439. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154439.
4
Migration of intrauterine device caused asymptomatic acute appendicitis: A case report.宫内节育器移位导致无症状性急性阑尾炎:一例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2021 May 24;9(5):e04283. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.4283. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Intrauterine device found in an ovarian tumor: A case report.卵巢肿瘤中发现宫内节育器:一例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22825. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022825.
6
Identification and validation of uterine perforation, intrauterine device expulsion, and breastfeeding in four health care systems with electronic health records.在四个拥有电子健康记录的医疗保健系统中识别和验证子宫穿孔、宫内节育器排出及母乳喂养情况。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 23;11:635-643. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S201044. eCollection 2019.