• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用宫内节育器时子宫穿孔的风险因素。

Risk factors of uterine perforation when using contraceptive intrauterine devices.

机构信息

Women's Reproductive Health Research Center, Al‑Zahra Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Endometriosis Research Center, Iranian Society of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03298-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-024-03298-3
PMID:39334324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11428400/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most popular methods of contraception, and uterine perforation has been presented among the most significant potential complications of IUD use. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors of uterine perforation when using an IUD.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all 164 women who have referred to Al-Zahra hospital in Tabriz- Iran to remove the retained IUD from March 2018 to March 2021, were investigated in two groups. Patients in case group underwent surgery to remove the dislocated device and management of its complications. In control group, the devices were removed using a Novak or ring forceps with or without hysteroscopy with no uterine perforation. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. P-Value was obtained for qualitative data via Fisher's exact test and Chi-Squared test and for quantitative data via Mann-Whitney U test and independent T-test.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients in the groups with or without uterine perforation was 30.57 and 36.78 years respectively (P = 0.01). The frequency of two or more parities among patients with uterine perforation was higher than other patients (P = 0.13). Ultrasound study before (p = 0.037) and after (p = 0.007) IUD insertion was higher among patients without uterine perforation. The less inexperience of healthcare providers (P = 0.013) and lack of scheduled follow-up visits after the IUD insertion (P < 0.001), are the other important factors affecting the uterine perforation. Abdominal pain was the most common compliant of uterine perforation (P < 0.001) and laparoscopy was the most used surgery to remove the misplaced device.

CONCLUSION

Uterine perforation can be effectively prevented by hiring experienced health care providers and appropriate patient selection.

摘要

背景

宫内节育器(IUD)是最受欢迎的避孕方法之一,而子宫穿孔已被认为是 IUD 使用中最严重的潜在并发症之一。本研究旨在评估使用 IUD 时子宫穿孔的危险因素。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们对 2018 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月期间前往伊朗大不里士 Al-Zahra 医院取出滞留 IUD 的 164 名女性进行了研究,将其分为两组。病例组患者接受手术取出移位装置并处理其并发症。在对照组中,使用 Novak 或环形钳子在没有子宫穿孔的情况下取出节育器,或在宫腔镜下取出节育器。使用 SPSS 软件分析数据,P 值<0.05 为统计学显著。定性数据采用 Fisher 确切检验和卡方检验,定量数据采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和独立 T 检验。

结果

有子宫穿孔和无子宫穿孔患者的平均年龄分别为 30.57 岁和 36.78 岁(P=0.01)。子宫穿孔患者中有两次或更多次分娩的比例高于其他患者(P=0.13)。无子宫穿孔患者的超声检查在 IUD 插入前(p=0.037)和插入后(p=0.007)均较高。医护人员经验不足(P=0.013)和缺乏 IUD 插入后的定期随访(P<0.001)是影响子宫穿孔的其他重要因素。腹痛是子宫穿孔最常见的投诉(P<0.001),腹腔镜是取出移位装置最常用的手术。

结论

通过雇佣有经验的医疗保健提供者和适当的患者选择,可以有效预防子宫穿孔。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83af/11428400/92ccf855f33d/12905_2024_3298_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83af/11428400/92ccf855f33d/12905_2024_3298_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83af/11428400/92ccf855f33d/12905_2024_3298_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors of uterine perforation when using contraceptive intrauterine devices.使用宫内节育器时子宫穿孔的风险因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03298-3.
2
Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment.宫内节育器致子宫穿孔:临床经过与治疗。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Jun;28(6):1546-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det074. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
3
Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management.移位的宫内节育器:临床表现、诊断和处理。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Apr;26(2):160-166. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1874337. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
4
Design of the Association of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study: a multisite retrospective cohort study.《子宫穿孔与宫内节育器排出相关因素研究》设计:多中心回顾性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):599.e1-599.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
Asymptomatic uterine perforation and IUD migration to the broad ligament: A case report.无症状性子宫穿孔及宫内节育器迁移至阔韧带:1 例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 16;103(7):e33857. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033857.
6
Perforated intraperitoneal intrauterine contraceptive devices: diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes.腹腔内穿孔的宫内节育器:诊断、处理及临床结局
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.123. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
7
Complications after interval postpartum intrauterine device insertion.间隔产后宫内节育器放置后的并发症。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):95.e1-95.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.028. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
8
Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management.宫内节育器放置后子宫完全穿孔和部分穿孔及嵌顿。二、诊断方法、预防及处理
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981 Aug;36(8):401-17. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198108000-00001.
9
Uterine perforation by copper intrauterine device.宫内节育器致子宫穿孔
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1984 Jun;17(4):257-61. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(84)90068-6.
10
Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.产后宫内节育器:成功的关键
Contraception. 1992 Apr;45(4):351-61. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90057-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal of an incarcerated intrauterine device reaching the serosal surface of the uterus by hysteroscopy alone: a case report.单纯经宫腔镜取出达子宫浆膜面的嵌顿宫内节育器:一例报告
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 7;11:1486745. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1486745. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management.移位的宫内节育器:临床表现、诊断和处理。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Apr;26(2):160-166. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1874337. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
2
A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device.一项比较胎盘后置入后排出的前瞻性队列研究:左炔诺孕酮与铜宫内节育器。
Contraception. 2019 Aug;100(2):101-105. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
Two year continuation rates of contraceptive methods in France: a cohort study from the French national health insurance database.
法国避孕方法的两年持续率:一项来自法国国家健康保险数据库的队列研究。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018 Dec;23(6):421-426. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1535653. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
4
Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.产后放置宫内节育器后脱落:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;132(4):895-905. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002822.
5
Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery.产后 6 个月内取出阴道分娩后放置的胎盘后铜宫内节育器。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):183.e1-183.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.032. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
6
Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives.宫内节育器与子宫穿孔风险:当前观点
Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Mar 16;7:19-32. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546. eCollection 2016.
7
A Rare Reason of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.子宫异常出血的一个罕见原因。
Acta Med Iran. 2017 Sep;55(9):602-603.
8
IUD use among parous women and risk of uterine perforation: a secondary analysis.经产妇使用宫内节育器与子宫穿孔风险:一项二次分析
Contraception. 2017 Jun;95(6):605-607. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
9
Women's willingness and ability to feel the strings of their intrauterine device.女性感知其宫内节育器尾丝的意愿和能力。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jun;137(3):309-313. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12130. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
10
The effect of intrauterine devices on acquisition and clearance of human papillomavirus.宫内节育器对人乳头瘤病毒感染及清除的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):386.e1-386.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1053. Epub 2016 Dec 14.