Olejnik Judith, Forero Adriana, Deflubé Laure R, Hume Adam J, Manhart Whitney A, Nishida Andrew, Marzi Andrea, Katze Michael G, Ebihara Hideki, Rasmussen Angela L, Mühlberger Elke
Department of Microbiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Virol. 2017 May 12;91(11). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00179-17. Print 2017 Jun 1.
Ebola virus (EBOV) and Reston virus (RESTV) are members of the genus which greatly differ in their pathogenicity. While EBOV causes a severe disease in humans characterized by a dysregulated inflammatory response and elevated cytokine and chemokine production, there are no reported disease-associated human cases of RESTV infection, suggesting that RESTV is nonpathogenic for humans. The underlying mechanisms determining the pathogenicity of different ebolavirus species are not yet known. In this study, we dissected the host response to EBOV and RESTV infection in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). As expected, EBOV infection led to a profound proinflammatory response, including strong induction of type I and type III interferons (IFNs). In contrast, RESTV-infected macrophages remained surprisingly silent. Early activation of IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and NF-κB was observed in EBOV-infected, but not in RESTV-infected, MDMs. In concordance with previous results, MDMs treated with inactivated EBOV and Ebola virus-like particles (VLPs) induced NF-κB activation mediated by Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in a glycoprotein (GP)-dependent manner. This was not the case in cells exposed to live RESTV, inactivated RESTV, or VLPs containing RESTV GP, indicating that RESTV GP does not trigger TLR4 signaling. Our results suggest that the lack of immune activation in RESTV-infected MDMs contributes to lower pathogenicity by preventing the cytokine storm observed in EBOV infection. We further demonstrate that inhibition of TLR4 signaling abolishes EBOV GP-mediated NF-κB activation. This finding indicates that limiting the excessive TLR4-mediated proinflammatory response in EBOV infection should be considered as a potential supportive treatment option for EBOV disease. Emerging infectious diseases are a major public health concern, as exemplified by the recent devastating Ebola virus (EBOV) outbreak. Different ebolavirus species are associated with widely varying pathogenicity in humans, ranging from asymptomatic infections for Reston virus (RESTV) to severe disease with fatal outcomes for EBOV. In this comparative study of EBOV- and RESTV-infected human macrophages, we identified key differences in host cell responses. Consistent with previous data, EBOV infection is associated with a proinflammatory signature triggered by the surface glycoprotein (GP), which can be inhibited by blocking TLR4 signaling. In contrast, infection with RESTV failed to stimulate a strong host response in infected macrophages due to the inability of RESTV GP to stimulate TLR4. We propose that disparate proinflammatory host signatures contribute to the differences in pathogenicity reported for ebolavirus species and suggest that proinflammatory pathways represent an intriguing target for the development of novel therapeutics.
埃博拉病毒(EBOV)和雷斯顿病毒(RESTV)属于同一属,但它们的致病性差异很大。EBOV可导致人类患上严重疾病,其特征为炎症反应失调以及细胞因子和趋化因子产生增加,而目前尚无与疾病相关的RESTV感染人类病例报告,这表明RESTV对人类无致病性。不同埃博拉病毒物种致病性的潜在机制尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们剖析了原代人单核细胞衍生巨噬细胞(MDM)对EBOV和RESTV感染的宿主反应。正如预期的那样,EBOV感染引发了强烈的促炎反应,包括强烈诱导I型和III型干扰素(IFN)。相比之下,感染RESTV的巨噬细胞却出奇地安静。在感染EBOV的MDM中观察到干扰素调节因子3(IRF3)和核因子κB(NF-κB)的早期激活,而在感染RESTV的MDM中未观察到。与先前的结果一致,用灭活的EBOV和埃博拉病毒样颗粒(VLP)处理的MDM以糖蛋白(GP)依赖的方式诱导由Toll样受体4(TLR4)介导的NF-κB激活。在暴露于活的RESTV、灭活的RESTV或含有RESTV GP的VLP的细胞中则并非如此,这表明RESTV GP不会触发TLR4信号传导。我们的结果表明,感染RESTV的MDM中缺乏免疫激活,通过防止EBOV感染中观察到的细胞因子风暴,导致其致病性降低。我们进一步证明,抑制TLR4信号传导可消除EBOV GP介导的NF-κB激活。这一发现表明,限制EBOV感染中TLR4介导的过度促炎反应应被视为埃博拉病毒病潜在的支持性治疗选择。新发传染病是一个重大的公共卫生问题,最近毁灭性的埃博拉病毒(EBOV)疫情就是例证。不同的埃博拉病毒物种在人类中的致病性差异很大,从雷斯顿病毒(RESTV)的无症状感染到EBOV导致的严重疾病并伴有致命后果。在这项对感染EBOV和RESTV的人类巨噬细胞的比较研究中,我们确定了宿主细胞反应的关键差异。与先前的数据一致,EBOV感染与由表面糖蛋白(GP)触发的促炎特征相关,该特征可通过阻断TLR4信号传导来抑制。相比之下,由于RESTV GP无法刺激TLR4,感染RESTV未能在受感染的巨噬细胞中刺激强烈的宿主反应。我们认为,不同的促炎宿主特征导致了埃博拉病毒物种所报告的致病性差异,并表明促炎途径是开发新型疗法的一个有趣靶点。