Olejnik Judith, Hume Adam J, Ross Stephen J, Scoon Whitney A, Seitz Scott, White Mitchell R, Slutzky Ben, Yun Nadezhda E, Mühlberger Elke
Department of Virology, Immunology and Microbiology, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston University, Boston, MA 02218, USA.
Pathogens. 2023 Jul 19;12(7):952. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12070952.
The study of highly pathogenic viruses handled under BSL-4 conditions and classified as Select Agents frequently involves the transfer of inactivated materials to lower containment levels for downstream analyses. Adhering to Select Agent and BSL-4 safety regulations requires validation or verification of the inactivation procedures, which comes with an array of challenges for each method. This includes the use of cytotoxic reagents for chemical inactivation and defining the precise inactivation parameters for physical inactivation. Here, we provide a workflow for various inactivation methods using Ebola, Nipah, and Lassa viruses as our examples. We choose three distinct inactivation methods (TRIzol/TRIzol LS, aldehyde fixation using different fixatives, and heat) to highlight the challenges of each method and provide possible solutions. We show that, whereas published chemical inactivation methods are highly reliable, the parameters for heat inactivation must be clearly defined to ensure complete inactivation. In addition to the inactivation data, we also provide examples and templates for the documentation required for approval and use of inactivation SOPs, including an inactivation report, the procedure sections of developed SOPs, and an electronic inactivation certificate that accompanies inactivated samples. The provided information can be used as a roadmap for similar studies at high and maximum containment laboratories.
在生物安全四级(BSL-4)条件下处理并被列为选择代理的高致病性病毒研究,常常涉及将灭活材料转移到较低防护水平以进行下游分析。遵守选择代理和BSL-4安全规定需要对灭活程序进行验证或核查,而每种方法都面临一系列挑战。这包括使用细胞毒性试剂进行化学灭活以及确定物理灭活的确切参数。在此,我们以埃博拉病毒、尼帕病毒和拉沙病毒为例,提供各种灭活方法的工作流程。我们选择三种不同的灭活方法(TRIzol/TRIzol LS、使用不同固定剂的醛固定以及加热)来突出每种方法的挑战并提供可能的解决方案。我们表明,尽管已发表的化学灭活方法高度可靠,但必须明确界定热灭活参数以确保完全灭活。除了灭活数据外,我们还提供了批准和使用灭活标准操作规程所需文件的示例和模板,包括一份灭活报告、已制定标准操作规程的程序部分以及随灭活样品附带的电子灭活证书。所提供的信息可作为高防护和最高防护实验室类似研究的路线图。