Suppr超能文献

荷兰头颈癌护理的差异:发病率、治疗及结局的回顾性队列评估

Variation in head and neck cancer care in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort evaluation of incidence, treatment and outcome.

作者信息

de Ridder M, Balm A J M, Baatenburg de Jong R J, Terhaard C H J, Takes R P, Slingerland M, Dik E, Sedee R J E, de Visscher J G A M, Bouman H, Willems S M, Wouters M W, Smeele L E, van Dijk B A C

机构信息

Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Department of Maxillo-facial Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;43(8):1494-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To explore variation in numbers and treatment between hospitals that treat head and neck cancer (HNC) in the Netherlands.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, while histopathological features were obtained by linkage to the national pathology record register PALGA. Inter-hospital variation in volume, stage, treatment, pathologically confirmed loco-regional recurrence and overall survival rate was evaluated by tumor site.

RESULTS

In total, 2094 newly diagnosed patients were included, ranging from 65 to 417 patients in participating hospitals treating HNC in 2008. Oral cavity cancer was mainly treated by surgery only, ranging from 46 to 82% per hospital, while the proportion of surgery with (chemo)radiotherapy ranged from 18 to 40%. Increasing age, male sex, and high stage were associated with a higher hazard of dying. In oropharynx cancer, the use of (chemo)radiotherapy varied from 31 to 82% between hospitals. We found an indication that higher volume was associated with a lower overall hazard of dying for the total group, but not by subsite. Low numbers, e.g. for salivary gland, nasopharynx, nasal cavity and paranasal sinus, did not permit all desired analyses.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed significant interhospital variation in numbers and treatment of especially oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer. This study is limited because we had to rely on data recorded in the past for a different purpose. To understand whether this variation is unwanted, future research should be based on prospectively collected data, including detailed information on recurrences, additional case-mix information and cause of death.

摘要

背景

探讨荷兰治疗头颈癌(HNC)的医院之间在病例数量和治疗方法上的差异。

材料与方法

从荷兰癌症登记处收集患者、肿瘤及治疗特征信息,同时通过与国家病理记录登记处PALGA建立联系获取组织病理学特征。按肿瘤部位评估医院间在病例数量、分期、治疗、病理确诊的局部区域复发及总生存率方面的差异。

结果

共纳入2094例新诊断患者,2008年参与治疗HNC的医院中,病例数从65例至417例不等。口腔癌主要仅采用手术治疗,各医院的比例从46%至82%不等,而手术联合(化疗)放疗的比例从18%至40%不等。年龄增加、男性及高分期与更高的死亡风险相关。在口咽癌中,各医院(化疗)放疗的使用比例从31%至82%不等。我们发现有迹象表明,总体上病例数量较多与较低的总死亡风险相关,但按亚部位分析则不然。病例数较少的情况,如唾液腺、鼻咽、鼻腔和鼻窦癌,无法进行所有期望的分析。

结论

本研究揭示了医院之间在病例数量及治疗方法上存在显著差异,尤其是在口咽癌和口腔癌方面。本研究存在局限性,因为我们不得不依赖过去为其他目的记录的数据。为了解这种差异是否不合理,未来的研究应基于前瞻性收集的数据,包括关于复发的详细信息、额外的病例组合信息及死亡原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验