Mok Shaffer R S, Arif Murtaza, Diehl David L, Khara Harshit S, Ho Henry C, Elfant Adam B
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, 501 Fellowship Rd, Suite 101, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054.
Geisinger Health Systems, Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17822.
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Mar;5(3):E157-E164. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-120225.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EBS) or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) are common techniques of biliary decompression. Potential risks include gastrointestinal hemorrhage, which can be increased by antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants (AC) and/or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (ie. apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban). The study aim is to evaluate the safety/efficacy of an alternative technique, minimal-EBS plus EPBD (m-EBS + EPBD), in individuals for whom clopidogrel, AC, and/or NOACs cannot be interrupted due to high cardiovascular or thromboembolic risk. Patients undergoing m-EBS + EPBD while taking clopidogrel and/or AC were retrospectively evaluated at two United States tertiary care centers for efficacy, GIB and procedure-related, cardiovascular and thromboembolic adverse events (AE). Ninety-five patients were identified [55 = clopidogrel and 45 = AC (31.1 % NOACs)]. The main indication for ERCP was choledocholithiasis (34 %). 100 % clinical improvement and 97.9 % endoscopic success were found. The incidence of AE was 5.3 %. There was a 4.2 % incidence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage (2 cases requiring endoscopic intervention). Both severe gastrointestinal hemorrhages also experienced the cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and 2 /3 of cholangitis (all aspirin + AC). There was 1cardiovascular event (non-ST elevation myocardial infarction), and no thromboembolic events. Minimal-EBS + EPBD is an effective and safe therapy with an incidence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage of 4.2 %, (2.1 % requiring endoscopic intervention), for patients on clopidogrel and/or AC, with a high risk for cardiovascular/thromboembolic events.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)联合内镜下胆管括约肌切开术(EBS)或内镜下乳头球囊扩张术(EPBD)是常见的胆道减压技术。潜在风险包括胃肠道出血,抗血小板药物、抗凝剂(AC)和/或新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs,即阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班)会增加这种风险。本研究旨在评估一种替代技术——最小化EBS联合EPBD(m-EBS + EPBD)在因心血管或血栓栓塞风险高而无法停用氯吡格雷、AC和/或NOACs的患者中的安全性/有效性。在美国的两家三级医疗中心,对正在服用氯吡格雷和/或AC并接受m-EBS + EPBD治疗的患者进行了回顾性评估,以了解疗效、胃肠道大出血(GIB)以及与手术相关的心血管和血栓栓塞不良事件(AE)。共确定了95例患者[55例服用氯吡格雷,45例服用AC(31.1%为NOACs)]。ERCP的主要适应证是胆总管结石(34%)。临床改善率为100%,内镜成功率为97.9%。不良事件发生率为5.3%。胃肠道出血发生率为4.2%(2例需要内镜干预)。2例严重胃肠道出血患者还发生了ERCP术后胰腺炎,2 / 3的患者发生了胆管炎(均为服用阿司匹林 + AC的患者)。发生了1例心血管事件(非ST段抬高型心肌梗死),无血栓栓塞事件。对于心血管/血栓栓塞事件风险高且正在服用氯吡格雷和/或AC的患者,最小化EBS + EPBD是一种有效且安全的治疗方法,胃肠道出血发生率为4.2%(2.1%需要内镜干预)。