Abad-Vivero Erika N, Thrasher James F, Arillo-Santillán Edna, Pérez-Hernández Rosaura, Barrientos-Gutíerrez Inti, Kollath-Cattano Christy, Mejía Raúl, Sargent James D
Department of Tobacco Research, Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Tob Control. 2016 Dec;25(e2):e113-e119. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052805. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
Use of flavour capsule varieties (FCVs) of cigarettes has rapidly increased in many countries. Adolescents are attracted to flavours; yet, surprisingly, no quantitative study has explored adolescents' perceptions of these products.
To characterise the appeal of FCVs for young adolescents in Mexico.
In 2015, surveys were conducted with a representative sample of Mexican middle school students (n=10 124; ages 11-16 years; mean 12.4 years). Students viewed and rated packs for FCVs and non-FCVs from major brands (Marlboro, Camel, Pall Mall), with brand names removed. For each pack, students were asked to write the brand name (ie, brand recall), to evaluate pack attractiveness, and to indicate the pack they were most interested in trying (including a 'none' option). Logistic generalised estimating equation (GEE) models regressed brand recall, pack attractiveness and interest in trying on brand and FCV (yes vs no), controlling for sociodemographics and smoking risk factors.
Marlboro regular, Camel regular, Camel light and Pall Mall FCVs were most often recalled (25%, 17%, 9%, 8%). Packs for Pall Mall FCVs and Camel FCVs were most often rated as very attractive (13%, 9%, respectively) and of interest for trial (22%, 13%) along with Marlboro regular (14%). In GEE models, FCVs were independently associated with greater attractiveness (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.83, 95% CI 1.72 to 1.94) and interest in trying (AOR=1.74, 95% CI 1.54 to 1.96). Perceived pack attractiveness was also independently associated with greater interest in trying (AOR=5.63, 95% CI 4.74 to 6.68).
FCVs appear to be generating even greater appeal among young adolescents than established non-FCVs in dominant brand families.
在许多国家,香烟调味胶囊品种(FCV)的使用迅速增加。青少年被口味所吸引;然而,令人惊讶的是,尚无定量研究探讨青少年对这些产品的认知。
描述FCV对墨西哥青少年的吸引力。
2015年,对墨西哥中学生的代表性样本(n = 10124;年龄11 - 16岁;平均12.4岁)进行了调查。学生们观看并对主要品牌(万宝路、骆驼、百乐门)的FCV和非FCV包装进行评分,品牌名称已去除。对于每个包装,要求学生写出品牌名称(即品牌回忆),评估包装吸引力,并指出他们最有兴趣尝试的包装(包括“都不”选项)。逻辑广义估计方程(GEE)模型将品牌回忆、包装吸引力和尝试兴趣回归到品牌和FCV(是与否),同时控制社会人口统计学和吸烟风险因素。
万宝路常规款、骆驼常规款、骆驼淡味款和百乐门FCV最常被回忆起(分别为25%、17%、9%、8%)。百乐门FCV和骆驼FCV的包装最常被评为非常有吸引力(分别为13%、9%)以及有兴趣尝试(22%、13%),万宝路常规款包装也有14%的学生感兴趣。在GEE模型中,FCV与更大的吸引力(调整后的比值比(AOR)= 1.83,95%置信区间1.72至1.94)和尝试兴趣(AOR = 1.74,95%置信区间1.54至1.96)独立相关。感知到的包装吸引力也与更大的尝试兴趣独立相关(AOR = 5.63,95%置信区间4.74至6.68)。
在主要品牌系列中,FCV在青少年中的吸引力似乎比既定的非FCV更大。