Suppr超能文献

德克萨斯州相对于美国的卷烟和无烟烟草市场。

The Cigarette and Smokeless Tobacco Markets in Texas Relative to the United States.

作者信息

Miller Lo Erin J, Giovenco Daniel P, Wackowski Olivia A, Harrell Melissa B, Perry Cheryl L, Delnevo Cristine D

机构信息

Research Assistant, Rutgers School of Public Health, Center for Tobacco Studies, Piscataway, NJ.

Assistant Professor, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Social Sciences, New York, NY.

出版信息

Tob Regul Sci. 2017 Apr;3(2):183-191. doi: 10.18001/TRS.3.2.6. Epub 2017 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the cigarette and smokeless tobacco (SLT) markets in Texas and the United States (US) as a whole.

METHODS

Nielsen convenience store sales data from 2014 were obtained for Dallas, Houston, San Antonio/Austin, and the total US. Descriptive statistics highlighted market share differences in Texas compared to the US overall.

RESULTS

Marlboro and Copenhagen dominated the cigarette (58.9%) and SLT markets (44.8%) in Texas and had substantially higher relative market shares in Texas than nationally (46.7% and 29.8%, respectively). Camel, with sales driven largely by its Camel Crush variety, held second place in Texas (9.8%), outselling Newport (6.6%), despite Newport's status as second best-selling brand in the US (11.5%). Copenhagen led the SLT market in Texas, outselling Grizzly 2 to 1, yet the brands hold roughly equivalent shares nationally. Whereas flavored SLT products made up nearly 60% of the US SLT market, unflavored SLT (58.6%) dominated in Texas markets. Finally, sales of fine-cut SLT in Texas were more than triple their national market share.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional tobacco market share differences are likely influenced by multiple factors such as marketing, population demographics, culture, and neighboring communities. Policymakers are encouraged to develop local tobacco control policies and programs within the context of this knowledge.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了得克萨斯州与整个美国的卷烟和无烟烟草(SLT)市场。

方法

获取了2014年达拉斯、休斯敦、圣安东尼奥/奥斯汀以及整个美国的尼尔森便利店销售数据。描述性统计突出了得克萨斯州与美国整体市场份额的差异。

结果

万宝路和哥本哈根分别在得克萨斯州的卷烟(58.9%)和无烟烟草市场(44.8%)中占据主导地位,且在得克萨斯州的相对市场份额大幅高于全国水平(分别为46.7%和29.8%)。骆驼品牌在得克萨斯州以9.8%的销量位居第二,尽管新港在美国是第二畅销品牌(11.5%),但其销量仍超过新港(6.6%)。骆驼品牌的销量主要由其爆珠系列推动。哥本哈根在得克萨斯州的无烟烟草市场中领先,销量是灰熊的两倍,但这两个品牌在全国的份额大致相当。在美国,调味无烟烟草产品占无烟烟草市场近60%,而在得克萨斯州市场,无味无烟烟草(58.6%)占主导地位。最后,得克萨斯州细切无烟烟草的销量超过其全国市场份额的三倍。

结论

区域烟草市场份额差异可能受到营销、人口统计学、文化和周边社区等多种因素的影响。鼓励政策制定者在此知识背景下制定地方烟草控制政策和项目。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Do tobacco industry websites target content to specific demographic groups?烟草业网站是否针对特定的人口统计群体提供内容?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Mar 1;208:107852. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107852. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

4
The Case to Include Brand of Moist Snuff in Health Surveys.在健康调查中纳入湿鼻烟品牌的案例。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Aug;18(8):1786-90. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw094. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
8
Switching to E-Cigarettes in the Event of a Menthol Cigarette Ban.在薄荷醇香烟被禁的情况下转向电子烟。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1286-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv021. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验