• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于训练周期化的实证研究是否可靠?对概念和方法学问题的全面综述。

Is Empirical Research on Periodization Trustworthy? A Comprehensive Review of Conceptual and Methodological Issues.

作者信息

Afonso José, Nikolaidis Pantelis T, Sousa Patrícia, Mesquita Isabel

机构信息

Centre for Research, Formation, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport. Faculty of Sport - University of Porto , Portugal.

Department of Physical and Cultural Education - Hellenic Army Academy , Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Mar 1;16(1):27-34. eCollection 2017 Mar.

PMID:28344448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5358028/
Abstract

Periodization is a core concept in training. Recently, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have attempted to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic, but theoretical criticisms have arisen with regard to how such research has been conducted. The purpose of the study was to review comprehensively the conceptual and methodological issues surrounding empirical research on periodization in training with human subjects. A search was conducted late in February 2016 on Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus, MedicLatina, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science. Forty-two randomized or randomized controlled trials were retrieved. Problems emerged in three domains: (a) Conceptually, periodization and variation were applied differently in research, while no empirical research tested predictions concerning direction, timing or magnitude of the adaptations; (b) Study design: More than 95% of papers investigated the 'physical' factor (mainly strength). Research on long-term effects was absent (no study lasted more than nine months). Controlling for confounding factors such as nutrition, supplementation and medication was largely ignored; (c) Data analysis was biased as dispersion in responsiveness was ignored when discussing the findings. Overall, research on periodization fails to analyze the conceptual premises proposed by these approaches.

摘要

周期化是训练中的一个核心概念。最近,系统评价和荟萃分析试图对该主题进行全面概述,但对于此类研究的开展方式出现了理论批评。本研究的目的是全面回顾围绕人体训练周期化实证研究的概念和方法问题。2016年2月下旬在《学术搜索完整版》《护理学与健康领域数据库》《拉丁医学数据库》《医学索引》《心理学文摘数据库》《医学期刊数据库》《科学电子在线图书馆》《Scopus数据库》《体育文献数据库》和《科学引文索引》上进行了检索。检索到42项随机或随机对照试验。在三个领域出现了问题:(a) 在概念上,周期化和变化在研究中的应用方式不同,而没有实证研究检验关于适应方向、时间或程度的预测;(b) 研究设计:超过95%的论文研究了“身体”因素(主要是力量)。缺乏对长期影响的研究(没有一项研究持续超过九个月)。在很大程度上忽略了对营养、补充剂和药物等混杂因素的控制;(c) 在讨论研究结果时,由于忽略了反应性的离散度,数据分析存在偏差。总体而言,关于周期化的研究未能分析这些方法所提出的概念前提。

相似文献

1
Is Empirical Research on Periodization Trustworthy? A Comprehensive Review of Conceptual and Methodological Issues.关于训练周期化的实证研究是否可靠?对概念和方法学问题的全面综述。
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Mar 1;16(1):27-34. eCollection 2017 Mar.
2
A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses Comparing Periodized and Non-periodized Exercise Programs: Why We Should Go Back to Original Research.一项比较周期性和非周期性运动计划的Meta分析的系统评价:为何我们应回归原始研究。
Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 7;10:1023. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01023. eCollection 2019.
3
Effects of linear and daily undulating periodized resistance training programs on measures of muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.线性和每日波动周期性抗阻训练计划对肌肉肥大指标的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PeerJ. 2017 Aug 22;5:e3695. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3695. eCollection 2017.
4
Periodization: Variation in the Definition and Discrepancies in Study Design.分期:定义的变化和研究设计的差异。
Sports Med. 2021 Apr;51(4):625-651. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01414-5. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Periodization: current review and suggested implementation for athletic rehabilitation.分期训练:运动康复的最新回顾与建议实施。
Sports Health. 2010 Nov;2(6):509-18. doi: 10.1177/1941738110375910.
6
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
7
The General Adaptation Syndrome: A Foundation for the Concept of Periodization.全身适应综合征:分期概念的基础。
Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):787-797. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0855-3.
8
The use of periodization in exercise prescriptions for inactive adults: A systematic review.针对不活跃成年人的运动处方中周期化训练的应用:一项系统综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2015 May 6;2:385-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.04.023. eCollection 2015.
9
Towards a de facto Nonlinear Periodization: Extending Nonlinearity from Programming to Periodizing.迈向事实上的非线性周期化:将非线性从训练计划扩展到周期划分。
Sports (Basel). 2020 Aug 8;8(8):110. doi: 10.3390/sports8080110.
10
Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss.对牙周炎病史对种植牙脱落影响的系统评价进行批判性评估。
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 May;40(5):542-52. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12096.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of 12 Weeks of Resistance Training on Body Composition, Muscle Hypertrophy and Function, Blood Lipid Level, and Hemorheological Properties in Middle-Aged Obese Women.12周抗阻训练对中年肥胖女性身体成分、肌肉肥大与功能、血脂水平及血液流变学特性的影响
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 12;24(7):196. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2407196. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
What We Do Not Know About Stretching in Healthy Athletes: A Scoping Review with Evidence Gap Map from 300 Trials.关于健康运动员拉伸的未知问题:一项范围综述,来自 300 项试验的证据差距图。
Sports Med. 2024 Jun;54(6):1517-1551. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02002-7. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
Coaches' Perceptions of Common Planning Concepts Within Training Theory: An International Survey.教练对训练理论中常见规划概念的认知:一项国际调查。
Sports Med Open. 2023 Nov 21;9(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00657-6.
4
Strength and Conditioning Practices of Brazilian Olympic Sprint and Jump Coaches.巴西奥运会短跑和跳远教练的体能训练方法
J Hum Kinet. 2023 Jan 20;86:175-194. doi: 10.5114/jhk/159646. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses Comparing Periodized and Non-periodized Exercise Programs: Why We Should Go Back to Original Research.一项比较周期性和非周期性运动计划的Meta分析的系统评价:为何我们应回归原始研究。
Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 7;10:1023. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01023. eCollection 2019.
6
Periodized Resistance Training for Enhancing Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength: A Mini-Review.用于增强骨骼肌肥大和力量的周期性抗阻训练:一项小型综述。
Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 23;10:13. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00013. eCollection 2019.
7
Biological Background of Block Periodized Endurance Training: A Review.块周期耐力训练的生物学背景:综述。
Sports Med. 2019 Jan;49(1):31-39. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-1019-9.
8
Non-Linear Resistance Training Program Induced Power and Strength but Not Linear Sprint Velocity and Agility Gains in Young Soccer Players.非线性阻力训练计划可提升年轻足球运动员的力量和功率,但对直线冲刺速度和敏捷性提升无效。
Sports (Basel). 2018 May 14;6(2):43. doi: 10.3390/sports6020043.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of protein quality on the promotion of resistance exercise-induced changes in muscle mass.蛋白质质量对促进抗阻运动引起的肌肉量变化的影响。
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2016 Sep 29;13:64. doi: 10.1186/s12986-016-0124-8. eCollection 2016.
2
The use of periodization in exercise prescriptions for inactive adults: A systematic review.针对不活跃成年人的运动处方中周期化训练的应用:一项系统综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2015 May 6;2:385-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.04.023. eCollection 2015.
3
Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages.不同年龄男性和女性在抗阻训练引起的肌肉力量和质量反应方面的异质性。
Age (Dordr). 2016 Feb;38(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
4
The Interaction Between Statins and Exercise: Mechanisms and Strategies to Counter the Musculoskeletal Side Effects of This Combination Therapy.他汀类药物与运动的相互作用:应对这种联合治疗肌肉骨骼副作用的机制与策略。
Ochsner J. 2015 Winter;15(4):429-37.
5
Undecidability of the spectral gap.谱隙的不可判定性。
Nature. 2015 Dec 10;528(7581):207-11. doi: 10.1038/nature16059.
6
Differences in change in coping styles between good responders, moderate responders and non-responders to pulmonary rehabilitation.肺康复治疗中,良好反应者、中度反应者和无反应者在应对方式变化上的差异。
Respir Med. 2015 Dec;109(12):1540-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
7
Modified Daily Undulating Periodization Model Produces Greater Performance Than a Traditional Configuration in Powerlifters.改良版每日波动周期化模型在力量举运动员中产生的表现优于传统训练模式。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Mar;30(3):784-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001165.
8
Block-Periodized Training Improves Physiological and Tactically Relevant Performance in Naval Special Warfare Operators.阶段性周期训练可提高海军特种作战人员的生理和战术相关表现。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jan;30(1):39-52. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001082.
9
Block vs. Weekly Undulating Periodized Resistance Training Programs in Women.女性进行的分组训练与每周波动周期化抗阻训练计划对比
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Oct;29(10):2679-87. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000948.
10
5-week block periodization increases aerobic power in elite cross-country skiers.为期5周的阶段性周期训练可提高优秀越野滑雪运动员的有氧能力。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Feb;26(2):140-6. doi: 10.1111/sms.12418. Epub 2015 Feb 3.