Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, AW Smith Building, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
J Neural Eng. 2017 Aug;14(4):046012. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa6945.
Neural prostheses employing platinum electrodes are often constrained by a charge/charge-density parameter known as the Shannon limit. In examining the relationship between charge injection and observed tissue damage, the electrochemistry at the electrode-tissue interface should be considered. The charge-storage capacity (CSC) is often used as a predictor of how much charge an electrode can inject during stimulation, but calculating charge from a steady-state i-E curve (cyclic voltammogram) over the water window misrepresents how electrodes operate during stimulation. We aim to gain insight into why CSC predictions from classic i-E curves overestimate the amount of charge that can be injected during neural stimulation pulsing.
In this study, we use a standard electrochemical technique to investigate how platinum electrochemistry depends on the potentials accessed by the electrode and on the electrolyte composition.
The experiments indicate: (1) platinum electrodes must be subjected to a 'cleaning' procedure in order to expose the maximum number of surface platinum sites for hydrogen adsorption; (2) the 'cleaned' platinum surface will likely revert to an obstructed condition under typical neural stimulation conditions; (3) irreversible oxygen reduction may occur under neural stimulation conditions, so the consequences of this reaction should be considered; and (4) the presence of the chloride ion (Cl) or proteins (bovine serum albumin) inhibits oxide formation and alters H adsorption.
These observations help explain why traditional CSC calculations overestimate the charge that can be injected during neural stimulation. The results underscore how careful electrochemical examination of the electrode-electrolyte interface can result in more accurate expectations of electrode performance during applied stimulation.
采用铂电极的神经假体通常受到电荷/电荷密度参数的限制,该参数称为香农极限。在研究电荷注入与观察到的组织损伤之间的关系时,应考虑电极-组织界面的电化学。电荷存储容量(CSC)通常用作预测电极在刺激期间可以注入多少电荷的指标,但从稳态 i-E 曲线(循环伏安法)计算水窗内的电荷会错误地表示电极在刺激期间的工作方式。我们旨在深入了解为什么经典 i-E 曲线的 CSC 预测会高估在神经刺激脉冲期间可以注入的电荷量。
在这项研究中,我们使用标准电化学技术来研究铂电化学如何取决于电极所达到的电位和电解质组成。
实验表明:(1)铂电极必须进行“清洁”程序,以暴露用于氢吸附的最大数量的表面铂位;(2)在典型的神经刺激条件下,“清洁”的铂表面可能会恢复到阻塞状态;(3)在神经刺激条件下可能会发生不可逆的氧还原,因此应考虑该反应的后果;(4)氯离子(Cl)或蛋白质(牛血清白蛋白)的存在会抑制氧化物的形成并改变 H 吸附。
这些观察结果有助于解释为什么传统的 CSC 计算会高估在神经刺激期间可以注入的电荷量。研究结果强调了如何通过仔细的电化学检查电极-电解质界面,可以更准确地预测应用刺激期间电极的性能。