• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation of the chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 in patients with colorectal cancer.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷CR29中文版在结直肠癌患者中的效度验证
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 14;23(10):1891-1898. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1891.
2
Psychometric Validation of the Bahasa Malaysia Version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-CR29马来西亚语版本的心理测量学验证
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(18):8101-5. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.18.8101.
3
A large scale prospective clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC colorectal (QLQ-CR29) module in Polish patients with colorectal cancer.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织结直肠癌(QLQ-CR29)模块在波兰结直肠癌患者中的大规模前瞻性临床和心理测量学验证。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Nov;26(6). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12713. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients.验证繁体中文版欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 29 量表用于评估结直肠癌患者的生活质量。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4312-y.
5
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 in patients with colorectal cancer.《欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷结直肠癌29项量表(EORTC QLQ-CR29)韩国版在结直肠癌患者中的文化调适与效度验证》
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Dec;23(12):3493-501. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2710-0. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Psychometric Validation of the Malaysian Chinese Version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Colorectal Cancer Patients.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷C30中文版在马来西亚结直肠癌患者中的心理测量学验证
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(18):8107-12. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.18.8107.
7
Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Moroccan Version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.文化调适与验证摩洛哥版 EORTC QLQ-CR29 在结直肠癌患者中的应用。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):1379-1385. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.4.1379.
8
Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer.EORTC QLQ-CR29 问卷模块评估结直肠癌患者健康相关生活质量的临床和心理计量学验证。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Nov;45(17):3017-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
9
Comparison of the FACT-C, EORTC QLQ-CR38, and QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires for patients with colorectal cancer: a literature review.用于结直肠癌患者的FACT-C、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷CR38和核心生活质量问卷CR29生活质量问卷比较:一项文献综述
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Aug;24(8):3661-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3270-7. Epub 2016 May 18.
10
The EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer: validation of the Dutch version.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)结直肠癌QLQ-CR29生活质量问卷:荷兰语版本的验证
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1853-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1210-5. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Body Composition Changes in Patients With Colorectal Cancer During Chemotherapy: A Longitudinal Study.化疗期间结直肠癌患者的患者报告结局与身体成分变化:一项纵向研究
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Aug 24;2025:1268096. doi: 10.1155/jonm/1268096. eCollection 2025.
2
Biofeedback magnetic stimulation improves postoperative bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery.生物反馈磁刺激可改善直肠癌手术后的术后肠功能障碍。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jul 25;17(7):5667-5678. doi: 10.62347/XBDR6986. eCollection 2025.
3
Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Serbian Version of the Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire: A Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation.克利夫兰诊所结直肠癌生活质量问卷塞尔维亚语版的验证与文化调适:全面的心理测量学评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 18;13(8):937. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080937.
4
Effects of mesenteric artery ligation level on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.新辅助放化疗后肠系膜动脉结扎水平对局部晚期直肠癌患者的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Dec 10;29(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03052-9.
5
Clinical application of eight-zone laparoscopic dissection strategy for rectal cancer: Experience and discussion.八区腹腔镜直肠癌解剖策略的临床应用:经验与探讨。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 14;30(30):3574-3583. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i30.3574.
6
Bowel function, quality of life, and mental health of patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or T1 colorectal cancer after organ-preserving versus organ-resection surgeries: a cross-sectional study at a Chinese tertiary care center.保肛手术与器官切除手术对高级别上皮内瘤变或 T1 结直肠癌患者的肠道功能、生活质量和心理健康的影响:中国一家三级医疗中心的横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5756-5768. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11120-2. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
7
Biofeedback combined with percutaneous electrical pudendal nerve stimulation for the treatment of low anterior rectal resection syndrome: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.生物反馈联合经皮阴部神经电刺激治疗低位前切除综合征的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jul 2;25(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08300-9.
8
External validation of the Moroccan Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal (CR29) module: Monocentric study.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织结直肠癌(CR29)模块摩洛哥阿拉伯语版本的外部验证:单中心研究。
World J Methodol. 2023 Sep 20;13(4):259-271. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.259.
9
The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on chemotherapy-induced side effects and immune function in colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.认知行为疗法对接受化疗的结直肠癌患者化疗引起的副作用及免疫功能的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Aug 31;14(4):1869-1877. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-625. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
10
The development and evaluation of a web-based complex intervention: The caring for couples coping with colorectal cancer "4Cs: CRC" program.基于网络的综合干预措施的开发与评估:关爱结直肠癌夫妇的“4C:CRC”项目。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Mar 9;9(5):100050. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.03.002. eCollection 2022 May.

本文引用的文献

1
National cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2012.2012年中国国家癌症发病率与死亡率
Chin J Cancer Res. 2016 Feb;28(1):1-11. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.02.08.
2
The EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer: validation of the Dutch version.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)结直肠癌QLQ-CR29生活质量问卷:荷兰语版本的验证
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1853-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1210-5. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
3
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
4
Validation and reliability testing of the EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 questionnaire module to assess patient-reported outcomes in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-NMIBC24问卷模块用于评估非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者报告结局的效度和信度测试。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1148-56. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.034. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
5
Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy's effects on health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors.奥沙利铂诱导的周围神经病变对结直肠癌幸存者健康相关生活质量的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1905-5. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
Health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌相关的生活质量。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;15(5):e215-22. doi: 10.1111/codi.12143.
7
Health-related quality of life among colorectal cancer patients in Malaysia: a study protocol.马来西亚结直肠癌患者的健康相关生活质量研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 3;12:384. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-384.
8
Adaptation of quality of life module EORTC QLQ-CR29 for Polish patients with rectal cancer: initial assessment of validity and reliability.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量模块QLQ-CR29在波兰直肠癌患者中的适应性:效度和信度的初步评估
Pol Przegl Chir. 2011 Sep;83(9):502-10. doi: 10.2478/v10035-011-0078-5.
9
Responsiveness of EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR38 and FACT-C quality of life questionnaires in patients with colorectal cancer.EORTC QLQ-C30、QLQ-CR38 和 FACT-C 生活质量问卷在结直肠癌患者中的反应性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Aug 22;9:70. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-70.
10
Early results of quality of life for curatively treated rectal cancers in Chinese patients with EORTC QLQ-CR29.EORTC QLQ-CR29 在中国接受根治性治疗的直肠癌患者的生活质量的早期结果。
Radiat Oncol. 2011 Aug 12;6:93. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-93.

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷CR29中文版在结直肠癌患者中的效度验证

Validation of the chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 in patients with colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Lin Jin-Bo, Zhang Lei, Wu Dong-Wen, Xi Zhou-Huan, Wang Xue-Jun, Lin Yun-Shou, Fujiwara Wakana, Tian Jing-Ru, Wang Min, Peng Peng, Guo Ai, Yang Zhen, Luo Le, Jiang Ling-Ya, Li Qia-Qia, Zhang Xue-Ying, Zhang Yun-Feng, Xu Hou-Wei, Yang Bing, Li Xun-Lin, Lei Yi-Xiong

机构信息

Jin-Bo Lin, Yi-Xiong Lei, School of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 14;23(10):1891-1898. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1891.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1891
PMID:28348496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5352931/
Abstract

AIM

To assess the validity and reliability of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29) in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

From March 2014 to January 2015, 356 patients with CRC from four different hospitals in China were enrolled in the study, and all patients self-administered the EORTC QLQ-CR29 and the quality of life core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Evaluation of the scores was based on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). The reliability and validity of the questionnaires were assessed by Cronbach's α coefficient, the Spearman correlation test and Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

The EORTC QLQ-CR29 showed satisfactory reliability (α > 0.7), although the urinary frequency and blood and mucus in stool dimensions had only moderate reliability (α = 0.608). The multitrait scaling analyses showed good convergent ( > 0.4) and discriminant validity. Significant differences were obtained for each item in the different KPS subgroups (KPS ≤ 80; KPS > 80). Body image and most single-item dimensions showed statistically significant differences in patients with a stoma compared with the rest of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The EORTC QLQ-CR29 exhibits high validity and reliability in Chinese patients with CRC, and can therefore be recommended as a valuable tool for the assessment of quality of life in these patients.

摘要

目的

评估欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织结直肠癌生活质量问卷29(EORTC QLQ-CR29)在中国结直肠癌(CRC)患者中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

2014年3月至2015年1月,来自中国四家不同医院的356例CRC患者纳入本研究,所有患者自行填写EORTC QLQ-CR29和生活质量核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)。基于卡诺夫斯基性能量表(KPS)对得分进行评估。通过克朗巴哈α系数、斯皮尔曼相关性检验和威尔科克森秩和检验对问卷的可靠性和有效性进行评估。

结果

EORTC QLQ-CR29显示出令人满意的可靠性(α>0.7),尽管尿频、便血和黏液便维度的可靠性仅为中等(α=0.608)。多特质量表分析显示出良好的收敛效度(>0.4)和区分效度。不同KPS亚组(KPS≤80;KPS>80)中各项目存在显著差异。与其他患者相比,造口患者的身体形象和大多数单项维度存在统计学显著差异。

结论

EORTC QLQ-CR29在中国CRC患者中具有较高的有效性和可靠性,因此可推荐作为评估这些患者生活质量的有价值工具。