Kolmos Mia, Krawcyk Rikke Steen, Kruuse Christina
Neurovascular Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Neurovascular Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Rehabilitation, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
SAGE Open Med. 2016 Dec 14;4:2050312116682253. doi: 10.1177/2050312116682253. eCollection 2016.
Exercise improves endothelial dysfunction, the key manifestation of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, and is recommended in both cardiovascular and cerebrovascular rehabilitation. Disagreement remains, however, on the role of intensity of exercise. The purpose of this review was to gather current knowledge on the effects of high-intensity training versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise on endothelial function in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular patients.
A systematic review was performed in PubMed database, Embase and Cochrane libraries and on PEDro using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were restricted to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular patients, and healthy subjects as general reference. Interventions comprised of high-intensity training alone, high-intensity training compared to moderate-intensity continuous exercise, or no training, with endothelial function as outcome measure. Endothelial function was measured either physiologically by flow-mediated dilatation and/or by systemic biomarkers. Data were analyzed descriptively due to non-comparability for a meta-analysis to be performed.
A total of 20 studies were included in the review. Although there was great heterogenecity in design, population and exercise protocols, all studies found high-intensity training to be safe. High-intensity training was equal to moderate-intensity continuous exercise through improvement in endothelial function in 15 of the 20 selected studies, as measured by flow-mediated dilatation, nitric oxide bioavailability and circulating biomarkers. Only a few studies examined high-intensity training in cerebrovascular patients, none with endothelial function as outcome.
High-intensity training is promising as a time-efficient exercise strategy in cardiovascular rehabilitation, but data on endothelial effects in cerebrovascular rehabilitation are warranted. Agreement on a more uniform exercise protocol is essential to further investigate the optimal exercise mode for cerebrovascular rehabilitation.
运动可改善内皮功能障碍,这是心脑血管疾病的关键表现,在心血管和脑血管康复中均被推荐。然而,关于运动强度的作用仍存在分歧。本综述的目的是收集当前关于高强度训练与中等强度持续运动对心脑血管疾病患者内皮功能影响的知识。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,在PubMed数据库、Embase和Cochrane图书馆以及PEDro上进行了系统评价。研究仅限于心脑血管疾病患者,并以健康受试者作为一般参考。干预措施包括单独的高强度训练、与中等强度持续运动相比的高强度训练或不进行训练,以内皮功能作为结局指标。内皮功能通过血流介导的扩张和/或全身生物标志物进行生理测量。由于数据不可比,无法进行Meta分析,因此对数据进行了描述性分析。
本综述共纳入20项研究。尽管在设计、人群和运动方案方面存在很大异质性,但所有研究均发现高强度训练是安全的。在20项选定研究中的15项中,通过血流介导的扩张、一氧化氮生物利用度和循环生物标志物测量,高强度训练在改善内皮功能方面与中等强度持续运动相当。只有少数研究对脑血管疾病患者进行了高强度训练,且均未以内皮功能作为结局指标。
高强度训练作为心血管康复中一种省时的运动策略很有前景,但需要有关其对脑血管康复内皮影响的数据。就更统一的运动方案达成共识对于进一步研究脑血管康复的最佳运动模式至关重要。