Schjerve Inga E, Tyldum Gjertrud A, Tjønna Arnt E, Stølen Tomas, Loennechen Jan P, Hansen Harald E M, Haram Per M, Heinrich Garreth, Bye Anja, Najjar Sonia M, Smith Godfrey L, Slørdahl Stig A, Kemi Ole J, Wisløff Ulrik
Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2008 Nov;115(9):283-93. doi: 10.1042/CS20070332.
Regular exercise training is recognized as a powerful tool to improve work capacity, endothelial function and the cardiovascular risk profile in obesity, but it is unknown which of high-intensity aerobic exercise, moderate-intensity aerobic exercise or strength training is the optimal mode of exercise. In the present study, a total of 40 subjects were randomized to high-intensity interval aerobic training, continuous moderate-intensity aerobic training or maximal strength training programmes for 12 weeks, three times/week. The high-intensity group performed aerobic interval walking/running at 85-95% of maximal heart rate, whereas the moderate-intensity group exercised continuously at 60-70% of maximal heart rate; protocols were isocaloric. The strength training group performed 'high-intensity' leg press, abdominal and back strength training. Maximal oxygen uptake and endothelial function improved in all groups; the greatest improvement was observed after high-intensity training, and an equal improvement was observed after moderate-intensity aerobic training and strength training. High-intensity aerobic training and strength training were associated with increased PGC-1alpha (peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor gamma co-activator 1alpha) levels and improved Ca(2+) transport in the skeletal muscle, whereas only strength training improved antioxidant status. Both strength training and moderate-intensity aerobic training decreased oxidized LDL (low-density lipoprotein) levels. Only aerobic training decreased body weight and diastolic blood pressure. In conclusion, high-intensity aerobic interval training was better than moderate-intensity aerobic training in improving aerobic work capacity and endothelial function. An important contribution towards improved aerobic work capacity, endothelial function and cardiovascular health originates from strength training, which may serve as a substitute when whole-body aerobic exercise is contra-indicated or difficult to perform.
规律的运动训练被认为是提高肥胖人群工作能力、内皮功能和心血管风险状况的有力工具,但高强度有氧运动、中等强度有氧运动或力量训练哪种是最佳运动方式尚不清楚。在本研究中,共有40名受试者被随机分为高强度间歇有氧训练组、持续中等强度有氧训练组或最大力量训练组,为期12周,每周三次。高强度组以最大心率的85 - 95%进行有氧间歇步行/跑步,而中等强度组以最大心率的60 - 70%持续运动;训练方案的热量相同。力量训练组进行“高强度”腿部推举、腹部和背部力量训练。所有组的最大摄氧量和内皮功能均有所改善;高强度训练后改善最为显著,中等强度有氧训练和力量训练后的改善程度相当。高强度有氧训练和力量训练与骨骼肌中PGC - 1α(过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ共激活因子1α)水平升高及钙转运改善有关,而只有力量训练改善了抗氧化状态。力量训练和中等强度有氧训练均降低了氧化型低密度脂蛋白水平。只有有氧训练降低了体重和舒张压。总之,在提高有氧工作能力和内皮功能方面,高强度有氧间歇训练优于中等强度有氧训练。力量训练对提高有氧工作能力、内皮功能和心血管健康有重要贡献,当全身有氧运动禁忌或难以进行时,力量训练可作为替代方式。