Fuertes-Kenneally Laura, Manresa-Rocamora Agustín, Blasco-Peris Carles, Ribeiro Fernando, Sempere-Ruiz Noemí, Sarabia José Manuel, Climent-Paya Vicente
Institute for Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante (ISABIAL), 03010, Alicante, Spain.
Cardiology Department, Alicante General University Hospital (HGUA), 03010, Alicante, Spain.
Sports Med Open. 2023 Feb 4;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00553-z.
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is considered an effective treatment for enhancing endothelial function in patients with heart failure (HF). However, recent studies have been published and the optimal "dose" of exercise required to increase the benefits of exercise-based CR programmes on endothelial function is still unknown.
(a) To estimate the effect of exercise-based CR on endothelial function, assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD), in patients with HF; (b) to determine whether high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is better than moderate-intensity training (MIT) for improving FMD; and (c) to investigate the influence of exercise modality (i.e. resistance exercise vs. aerobic exercise and combined exercise vs. aerobic exercise) on the improvement of endothelial function.
Electronic searches were carried out in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to February 2022. Random-effects models of between-group mean differences were estimated. Heterogeneity analyses were performed by means of the chi-square test and I index. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were used to test the influence of potential moderator variables on the effect of exercise.
We found a FMD increase of 3.09% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01, 4.17) in favour of aerobic-based CR programmes compared with control groups in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the results of included studies were inconsistent (p < .001; I = 95.2%). Higher FMD improvement was found in studies which were randomised, reported radial FMD, or performed higher number of training sessions a week. Moreover, HIIT enhanced FMD to a greater extent than MIT (2.35% [95% CI = 0.49, 4.22]) in patients with HFrEF. Insufficient data prevented pooled analyses for the effect of exercise in patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction and the influence of exercise modality on the improvement of endothelial function.
Aerobic-based CR is a non-pharmacological treatment for enhancing endothelial function in patients with HFrEF. However, higher training frequency and HIIT induce greater adaptation of endothelial function in these patients, which should betaken into consideration when designing exercise-based CR programmes. Trial registration The protocol was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022304687).
基于运动的心脏康复(CR)被认为是增强心力衰竭(HF)患者内皮功能的有效治疗方法。然而,最近已有研究发表,但基于运动的CR计划要增加对内皮功能有益效果所需的最佳运动“剂量”仍不清楚。
(a)评估基于运动的CR对HF患者内皮功能的影响,通过血流介导的血管舒张(FMD)进行评估;(b)确定高强度间歇训练(HIIT)在改善FMD方面是否优于中等强度训练(MIT);(c)研究运动方式(即抗阻运动与有氧运动以及联合运动与有氧运动)对内皮功能改善的影响。
截至2022年2月,在PubMed、Embase和Scopus中进行了电子检索。估计组间平均差异的随机效应模型。通过卡方检验和I指数进行异质性分析。亚组分析和meta回归用于检验潜在调节变量对运动效果的影响。
我们发现,与射血分数降低的HF(HFrEF)患者的对照组相比,基于有氧运动的CR计划使FMD增加了3.09%(95%置信区间[CI]=2.01,4.17)。然而,纳入研究的结果不一致(p<0.001;I=95.2%)。在随机、报告桡动脉FMD或每周进行训练次数较多的研究中发现FMD改善更高。此外,在HFrEF患者中,HIIT比MIT更能增强FMD(2.35%[95%CI=0.49,4.22])。数据不足妨碍了对HF且射血分数保留患者运动效果以及运动方式对内皮功能改善影响的汇总分析。
基于有氧运动的CR是增强HFrEF患者内皮功能的非药物治疗方法。然而,更高的训练频率和HIIT能使这些患者的内皮功能产生更大适应性,在设计基于运动的CR计划时应予以考虑。试验注册该方案已在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42022304687)上进行前瞻性注册。