Song Tara Elena, Jiang Nancy
1 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Panorama City, California, USA.
2 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Oakland, California, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May;156(5):803-808. doi: 10.1177/0194599817697050. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
Objectives Different surgical techniques have been described in the literature to increase vocal pitch. The purpose of this study is to systematically review these surgeries and perform a meta-analysis to determine which technique increases pitch the most. Data Sources CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Science Direct. Review Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed using the CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Science Direct databases. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated pitch-elevating phonosurgical techniques in live humans and performed pre- and postoperative acoustic analysis. Data were gathered regarding surgical technique, pre- and postoperative fundamental frequencies, perioperative care measures, and complications. Results Twenty-nine studies were identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Mechanisms of pitch elevation included increasing vocal cord tension (cricothyroid approximation), shortening the vocal cord length (cold knife glottoplasty, laser-shortening glottoplasty), and decreasing mass (laser reduction glottoplasty). The most common interventions were shortening techniques and cricothyroid approximation (6 studies each). The largest increase in fundamental frequency was seen with techniques that shortened the vocal cords. Preoperative speech therapy, postoperative voice rest, and reporting of patient satisfaction were inconsistent. Many of the studies were limited by low power and short length of follow-up. Conclusions Multiple techniques for elevation of vocal pitch exist, but vocal cord shortening procedures appear to result in the largest increase in fundamental frequency.
目的 文献中描述了不同的外科技术来提高嗓音音调。本研究的目的是系统回顾这些手术,并进行荟萃分析以确定哪种技术能最大程度地提高音调。
数据来源 CINAHL、Cochrane、Embase、Medline、PubMed和Science Direct。
综述方法 使用CINAHL、Cochrane、Embase、Medline、PubMed和Science Direct数据库对文献进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。如果研究评估了在活体人类中提高音调的嗓音外科技术,并进行了术前和术后声学分析,则符合纳入标准。收集了有关手术技术、术前和术后基频、围手术期护理措施及并发症的数据。
结果 共识别出29项研究。应用纳入和排除标准后,荟萃分析共纳入13项研究。提高音调的机制包括增加声带张力(环甲肌逼近术)、缩短声带长度(冷刀声门成形术、激光缩短声门成形术)以及减轻质量(激光减容声门成形术)。最常见的干预措施是缩短技术和环甲肌逼近术(各6项研究)。声带缩短技术使基频提高幅度最大。术前言语治疗、术后嗓音休息以及患者满意度报告并不一致。许多研究因样本量小和随访时间短而受到限制。
结论 存在多种提高嗓音音调的技术,但声带缩短手术似乎能使基频提高幅度最大。