Reid Dennis H, Parsons Marsha B, Jensen Joyce M
Carolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center, P. O. Box 425, Morganton, NC 28680 USA.
J. Iverson Riddle Center, Morganton, NC USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2015 Nov 30;10(1):12-21. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0101-0. eCollection 2017 Mar.
A frequent challenge encountered by behavior analysts in human service agencies is maintaining effects of their training interventions with agency staff. A case example is provided to illustrate how effects of a staff training intervention initiated by a behavior analyst maintained for an extended period in a center-based program for adolescents and adults with severe disabilities. The process involved the behavior analyst working closely with the program supervisor and a professional staff member in a collaborative team approach to increase involvement of center participants in functional (vs. nonfunctional) educational tasks. Initially, the team jointly developed an intervention to increase staffs' provision of functional tasks. The behavior analyst subsequently worked with the team members regarding how to implement the intervention by training their staff and providing feedback. The two team members then continued providing feedback during their respective supervisor tenures without continued presence of the behavior analyst. Results indicated that initial increases in participant involvement in functional tasks maintained during follow-up observations encompassing 30 years. Normative comparisons also showed that the levels were well above the level of functional task involvement in other center-based programs across that time period. Results are discussed regarding recommendations for behavior analysts to use a collaborative team approach with supervisors indigenous to an agency to help maintain staff behavior targeted for change by the behavior analysts.
行为分析师在人类服务机构中经常遇到的一个挑战是如何维持他们对机构工作人员培训干预的效果。本文提供了一个案例,以说明行为分析师发起的工作人员培训干预措施是如何在一个为重度残疾青少年和成年人提供服务的中心项目中长期维持效果的。这个过程包括行为分析师与项目主管和一名专业工作人员密切合作,采用协作团队的方式,以增加中心参与者对功能性(而非非功能性)教育任务的参与度。最初,团队共同制定了一项干预措施,以增加工作人员提供功能性任务的频率。随后,行为分析师与团队成员合作,指导他们如何通过培训员工和提供反馈来实施干预措施。之后,这两名团队成员在各自担任主管期间继续提供反馈,而行为分析师并未持续参与。结果表明,在长达30年的随访观察中,参与者对功能性任务的参与度在最初提高后一直得以维持。规范性比较还显示,这一水平在整个时间段内远高于其他中心项目中功能性任务的参与程度。本文还讨论了相关结果,并就行为分析师如何与机构内部主管采用协作团队方式提出了建议,以帮助维持行为分析师旨在改变的工作人员行为。